Le destin exécrable de Guillemette Babin (1948)
(awaiting 5 votes)
Reviews: 1 user Director:Guillaume Radot |
|
| 0Share... |
Le destin exécrable de Guillemette Babin (1948)
(awaiting 5 votes)
Reviews: 1 user Director:Guillaume Radot |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
|
|
Héléna Bossis | ... |
Guillemette Babin
|
|
|
Michel Barbey | ... |
Jean-François Pasquier
|
|
|
Germaine Kerjean | ... |
Radegonde, la mère de Guillemette
|
|
|
Palmyre Levasseur | ... |
Dame Pasquier
|
|
|
Édouard Delmont | ... |
Maître Pierre Pasquier
|
|
|
Francette Vernillat | ... |
Guillemette enfant
|
| Jean Carmet | ... |
Étienne
|
|
|
|
Jean Davy | ... |
Le procureur Salavert
|
|
|
Renaud Mary | ... |
Charles Perrin
|
|
|
Jacky Flynt | ... |
Mathilde
|
|
|
Colette Fleuriot | ... |
Clotilde
|
|
|
Paul Demange | ... |
Maître Nicolas
|
|
|
Alfred Baillou | ... |
Le geôlier
|
|
|
Jacques Dufilho | ... |
Un moine
|
|
|
Sylvain | ... |
L'idiot
|
The word "execrable" (which has the same meaning in English) is never used for a title of a movie .Perhaps the director wanted to warn the audience ,to urge them not to follow in his heroine 's steps ;and maybe to clear his name because of the censorship ;which did not prevent the Office Catholique Du Cinema from forbidding their flock the movie.
To be born a witch's daughter did not bod well for your future in the Middle Ages .However much Guillaumette tries to stay on the straight and narrow with a little help from a priest she visits ,what's bred in the bone comes out in the flesh.On the very night of her wedding,the infamous girl leaves the conjugal bed - one should say that her hubby could easily be her grandfather- to attend (and take part in) an execrable sabbath;this long sequence with topless women provoked an angry response from the well-meaning people ;it was rather risqué for the time.The director astutely allowed some doubt to remain about the reality of the event and thus (modestly) predated Roman Polanski's own ceremony in "Rosemary's baby" .
Too bad the director was not really up to scratch cause there was an original subject;too bad highly talented Germaine Kerjean disappeared after ten minutes ....nothing here to match Val Lewton's productions ,just a curiosity lost in the French cinema of the late forties .