| Page 1 of 10: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] |
| Index | 100 reviews in total |
17 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Cute movie, for someone in the mood for slapstick, physical comedy., 25 December 2002
Author:
TxMike from Houston, Tx, USA, Earth
I predicted the "critics" would review this film poorly, and I was right. If
I were a professional (paid) critic, I'd feel obligated too. But as a fun
film to watch for sheer entertainment, my wife and I thought it was a hoot.
The plot isn't terribly important, but it involves an FBI agent (Prinze)
trying to solve a diamond smuggling crime ring while falling for a pretty
art restorer (Potter). It would be a very straight and un-funny film without
the four models!!
Potter's character needs a new place when she finds her boyfriend cheating
on her, so finds what amounts to a large closet with a window for rent at
$500 a month ("cash, please, if you can") in a luxury apartment that is
given to four models. They like to rent out the "extra room" for a little
spending money. But these models are funny, say the darndest things, fall
over things, into things, and generally make the slapstick part of the film
work. Along with a Great Dane that runs and knocks Potter down every time he
sees her - except the last time!
None of the acting is great, but it is all OK. The dialog is snappy and
funny most of the time. Film fans who enjoy "Dumb and Dumber", "Happy
Gilmore", and "High Heels and Low Lifes" would probably also enjoy "Head
Over Heels." I rate it "7" of 10 for sheer fun.
13 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Incredibly funny if not taken too seriously, 11 August 2001
Author:
Mirax from Boston
I'll admit it: it's utterly embarrassing to watch this movie with another human being. I was embarrassed when I laughed uncontrollably at things numerous reviews had told me were idiotic humor. Well, this movie is idiotic. It's also adorable romantic comedy, with a funny and somewhat original premise . . . at least, it's cobbled together from original premises, like the "Rear Window" setup where Amanda thinks she witnesses her obsession across the street, Jim, murdering someone. Freddie Prinze Jr is completely irresistible, and Monica Potter's somewhat one-note nice-girl cuteness is made palatable by the insanity of her four supermodel roommates and her practical lesbian friend. Watch this, laugh hard and don't be embarrassed, because this movie, even at its most poorly scripted moments, is earnestly trying to make you laugh, unlike most of today's prefab romantic comedies, whose earnestness is sheer manipulation. Plus, only a small percentage of those have Freddie in them.
12 out of 14 people found the following review useful:
..you can't help but laugh., 20 June 2001
![]()
Author:
qball_82
I knew absolutely nothing about this film when I walked in except that it
starred Freddie Prinze Jr., and I wasn't really looking forward to it. I'm
happy to say that it was a pretty entertaining film and I have seen much
much worse...
There are some genuinely funny parts and the "stereotypical" models provided
the most laughs. It shares a lot in common with Miss Congeniality in how
the pretty girls are depicted as ditzy and just all-out stupid...obviously
it's not supposed to be a realistic portrayal, but you can't help but
laugh.
A lot of people seem to be paying this movie out big time, I just wanted to
add a positive comment. It's fluff, expect nothing more.
8 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Stereotypical and silly, but still in all good fun, 1 March 2006
![]()
Author:
Kristine (kristinedrama14@msn.com) from Chicago, Illinois
Oh, come on, people, was it really that irritating to you? Now, I
admit, in no way is this movie Oscar material or the best movie of
2001, but learn to have a little fun. Are you really telling me that
you couldn't laugh at the models? They took the movie and made it into
a fun ditzy comedy. Basically, it's incredibly predictable, but Freddie
Prinze, Jr. is a "fashion" business man who falls for Monica and she
does as well. But as she states that she has bad judgment of men, there
is a terrible thing she witnesses in an apartment with her "model"
roommates and see him commit a murder! Together they investigate to
find out if she is going to have a murderer boyfriend or live happily
ever after, you make the guess.
5/10
7 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Help, I'm drowning in bad dialogue!!!, 4 March 2001
![]()
Author:
ukchemee from Here and now
The title says it all. I felt like crying out in the movie theater, "Help, help - I'm drowning in bad dialogue". Whoever penned the script should be ashamed of themselves. The directing was something out of a middle school play. I really wish I were kidding here. While the two leads MAY have an ounce of skill, the directing quashed it altogether. The rest of the actors... well, let's just hope they didn't quit their day jobs for Hollywood. It scares me that people pay money to see movies like this repeatedly. Anyone who enjoyed this movie needs to seriously re-evaluate their tastes. For a better time, sit in the movie theater lobby and listen to other people's conversations. At least you'll get some decent dialogue.
13 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
Heartwarming, hilarious, romantic, and touching romantic comedy, 19 January 2006
![]()
Author:
Grace Zeh (filmgirlgz@gmail.com) from Chantilly, Virginia, USA
HEAD OVER HEELS, in my opinion, is a heartwarming, hilarious, romantic, and touching romantic comedy. If you ask me, the way that Jim (Freddie Prinze Jr.) and Amanda (Monica Potter) met was pure magic. This was because they were walking along and minding their own business. Plus, it was love at first sight. A lot of people have said that this is one of the worst movies they've ever seen, but I strongly disagree. This is a great movie with terrific performances from very talented actors and actresses. Before I wrap this up, I'd like to say, "This is a perfect movie to see with the one you love!" Now, in conclusion, to all you Freddie Prinze Jr. or Monica Potter fans that have not seen this heart-warming, hilarious, romantic, and touching romantic comedy, I highly recommend it! When you see it, prepare to laugh and have a good time.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
romantic comedy,screwball comedy,farce,all rolled into one, 14 November 2007
![]()
Author:
disdressed12 from Canada
this is one of the better romantic comedies i've seen in a while.for one thing,it has quite a few laughs.but i think that's because it's also a farce and a screwball comedy.i liked the slapstick scenes they threw in.i thought they were very effective.the dialogue in the movie is also great.there are some very witty scenes.it's also a mystery movie of sorts.Monica Potter and Freddie Prinze Jr.play the two leads in the film.both are instantly likable,(at least in this movie,at any rate)as are their characters.i don't feel this is your standard romantic comedy.it has other dimensions to it,which you'll notice when you watch it.i expected the movie to be average,mildly amusing fluff,but i'm glad i was wrong.there are a few moments where it is a bit slow,but for the most part,things flow along at a decent enough pace.for me,Head over Heels is a 7/10.
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
A average romantic comedy with delightful twists and turns, 21 February 2006
![]()
Author:
buffsterwahoo
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
This movie is a sweet romantic comedy that keeps u guessing all the way through.It has charm as well as many other things.It's an average romantic comedy that adds 4 models a one rude,one dumb as dirt,one that actually acts like a normal person,and one that's obsessed with diamonds.A girl Amanda moves in with and when everyones out of the room she thinks she sees a neighbor she likes killed someone.Her roommates and her go through all kinds of obstacles trying to find out if the neighbor killed someone or not. I loved this movie like I said before it's charming as well as funny. I recommend this to Freddie Prinze Jr. fans. Also to people who enjoy a good laugh.
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Good solid comedy, 31 January 2001
![]()
Author:
jerzeygrl from Washington, DC
Freddie Prinze Jr. & Monica Potter play "normal" people falling in love, amidst NYC's fashion scene. He's a fashion consultant & her new roommates are 4 up-and-coming models. Yes it's definitely a chick flick, but the movie is actually VERY funny. The models: Shalom, Sara, Ivana, & Tomiko play it way over the top and it works. I laughed out loud so many times, the people behind me kicked my seat... Freddie Prinze Jr. redeems himself, you don't catch him acting in this. I'd see it again in a minute!!
1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
I'm not saying only women should write rom-coms, but...., 27 December 2011
![]()
Author:
MBunge from Waterloo, Iowa
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
According to the credits, 4 men were responsible for this story and one
of them teamed with another guy to write the script. Add in the
director and at least 6 dudes had a hand in crafting this very
female-centric film. How do you think that worked out? There are plenty
of examples of one man with a singular vision writing a great story
about women. Even two fellows combining their talents to spin a yarn
about the fairer sex is somewhat common. But when 12 testicles try to
create a romantic-comedy with half a dozen significant female
characters and a leading man who's barely more than eye candy, the
result has all the tenderness of an assembly line and as much charm as
a baseball player scratching his crotch.
You can forgive the conceit that Monica Potter is playing an average
woman who moves in with 4 fashion models. I mean, this is Hollywood so
a standout beauty like Potter is as close to average as their tiny
brains can come. You can even forgive the models being played as the
sympathetic cheering section for Potter's character, even though
they're portrayed as stupid, shallow and materialistic. Though
inappropriate for their role, that's far more personality than "best
friend" characters usually get in rom-coms. What you can't forgive is
how Head Over Heels is clearly broken up into three sections that are
practically different genres.
It starts out with 30 minutes that includes almost every rom-com
cliché, including the woman walking in on her cheating boyfriend, a
makeover musical montage and a romantic misunderstanding. That segues
into a half hour parody of "women in peril" flicks, though somewhat in
reverse. Here, the woman sees the guy kill someone and then falls in
love with him. Everything wraps up with 30 minutes of action-comedy
involving international smuggling, fisticuffs at a fashion show and a
cunnilingus sight gag. Not a brief one, either. The bit goes on for the
better part of 30 seconds in a PG-13 film. That must have been a proud
day for the motion picture ratings board.
Amanda (Monica Potter) is an art restorer with terrible judgment about
men. When she catches her latest boyfriend cheating on her, she needs a
new place to stay and gets taken in by 4 models (Shalom Harlow, Ivana
Milicevic, Sarah O'Hare and Tomiko Fraser). Amanda is weak kneed at the
sight of a handsome stranger (Freddie Prinze Jr.) who turns out to live
in the building across the way, his apartment positioned just so Amanda
can see in his windows any time she wants. At first she thinks he's a
dreamboat, then Amanda remembers her awful luck with guys and looks for
a flaw. He turns out to really be a dreamboat, then Amanda sees him
beat some girl to death with a baseball bat. Her horror at that lasts
less than 10 minutes and she's back mooning over him, only to
eventually discover he has a big secret, just not any one she
suspected.
The bottom line on Head Over Heels is that it's badly written in
exactly the way you'd expect when 5 or 6 chaps each stick their paws
into a romantic-comedy stew. Here's a good example of what I mean.
Amanda spends virtually all of the film in the company of the 4 models.
They are her support system, her humorous foils and plot devices upon
which a lot of the movie depends. Except, when Amanda is introduced to
the audience she already has a best friend at her art restoration job,
a friend which is then dispensed with so Amanda and the models can team
up. Her original best friend is absent for at least 90% of the film and
brought back at the end for a couple of jokes. So, why was the original
best friend kept in the script? It's the same reason why the story
shifts through three different genres. With so many separate creative
voices, especially male ones, a single narrative vision could never
emerge.
Monica Potter is adorable, Freddie Prinze Jr. is generically handsome
and Head Over Heels at least makes consistent attempts at being funny.
A lot of those attempts are old hat and some are oddly crude, but a few
laughs make it through. Yes, the characters are all morons and you
don't actually care what happens to them. Reasonably appealing stars
and an honest effort to entertain can sometimes be enough, however, and
that might have been true here. The tripartite fiasco of the plot is
what ultimately dooms this motion picture.
This isn't as annoying as most bad rom-coms. That's not enough to make
it worth anyone's time.
| Page 1 of 10: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |