The Canterbury Tales (1998–2000)

TV Series  -   -  Animation
6.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.6/10 from 112 users  
Reviews: 4 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 132 titles
created 19 Feb 2011
 
a list of 133 titles
created 30 Oct 2011
 
a list of 5136 titles
created 11 Jan 2013
 
a list of 120 titles
created 3 months ago
 
a list of 1714 titles
created 1 week ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Canterbury Tales (1998–2000)

The Canterbury Tales (1998–2000) on IMDb 6.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of The Canterbury Tales.

Season:

2 | 1

Year:

2000 | 1998
Nominated for 1 Oscar. Another 9 wins. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Series cast summary:
...
 Harry Bailey (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Miller (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Summoner (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Pardoner / ... (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Merchant (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Wife of Bath (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Knight (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Prioress (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
...
 The Squire (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
David Troughton ...
 The Friar (2 episodes, 1998-2000)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Animation

Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

|

Release Date:

21 December 1998 (UK)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

(3 episodes)

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Version of Canterbury Tales (2003) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Animation that sees Chaucer as an early post-modernist.
7 December 2000 | by (dublin, ireland) – See all my reviews

Nearly two years after the initial episodes were broadcast, BBC2 finally got round to showing the concluding part of its trilogy of 'Canterbury Tales' in this, the 600th anniversary of Chaucers' death. The format is the same - three tales are framed by the journey of a ragbag group of pilgrims, this time on their way back from Canterbury, where they prayed at the shrine of the martyr Thomas a Becket.

This episode is the least satisfactory - the last two tales somewhat deficient in narrative or visual imagination. The first tale, though, the Squire's, is arguably the most beautiful of the whole series, telling of an Eastern kingdom, visited by a mysterious Red knight bearing magical gifts. His good intentions seem to go awry, as his magic leads to both the king's sons and generals vanishing, leaving the kingdom open to enemy invasion. The Red Knight promises to save the kingdom if he is crowned monarch, and his true intentions seem apparent; so thinks the princess he loves at any rate, as she refuses to marry him.

The animation of this tale is truly sublime, otherworldly, evincing a genuine magic, the bright, bleached primary colours creating a cool, Oriental atmosphere combining the magical and expressive, the watercolour texture achieving an emotional limpidity. This style allows for great freedom, especially when compared to the clumping puppetry of the succeeding tales - in one brief sequence the Red Knight talks about the power of his bird-shaped ring - the ring becomes a flock of birds, which in turn becomes the armour of the Knight, setting off a series of connections and meanings that run through the animation, and appropriately mimic the narrative and figurative complexity of Chaucer's poem.

If the other tales disappoint, the framing story delights, once again achieving a portrait of vibrant, bustling medievalism usually unavailable to live-action films. The sacred purpose of the Tales is quickly jettisoned for earthier pleasures - food, drink, gambling, sex etc. The cockfighting and pig-gutting give rather too vivid a picture of the time, as does the exposure of aristocratic and pious hypocrisy, the fruity language and the bawdy innuendo.

Although the pilgrimmage is supposed to be an ascetic journey, a purifying of worldly baggage, it becomes an excuse for all kinds of revelry and gorging excess. This is amply shown in the final story. The destination, the shrine, is supposed to be a celebration of God, wholeness, unity, his Word, which was made flesh. And yet the film does not end with this wholeness, but with the final tale, which is actually two tales, those of the Reeve and the Miller, which interrupt each other with increasing speed and violence, until the authority of the single narrator is broken, and the Babel of stories and voices spills open. From the Word of God to the uncontainable, diffuse narratology of the people. Chaucer may shut them out and praise God, but follow him and we'd have no tales. Or 'Tales'.


3 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Language versions Kevmo
Oscar nomination bernard-belanger
Discuss The Canterbury Tales (1998) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page