3,417 user 378 critic

The Blair Witch Project (1999)

R | | Horror | 30 July 1999 (USA)
0:33 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

Three film students vanish after traveling into a Maryland forest to film a documentary on the local Blair Witch legend, leaving only their footage behind.


, (as Eduardo Sanchez)


, (as Eduardo Sanchez)
752 ( 175)

'Blair Witch' Is Back

Head back into the woods with Blair Witch and uncover what The Blair Witch Project started. Check out photos from the new film and other haunting horror movie franchises.

17 wins & 21 nominations. See more awards »



Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

After moving into a suburban home, a couple becomes increasingly disturbed by a nightly demonic presence.

Director: Oren Peli
Stars: Katie Featherston, Micah Sloat, Mark Fredrichs
Exhibit A (2007)
Crime | Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  

The timely story of a normal family disintegrating under financial pressure, eventually driven to the unimaginable. We witness the terrifying events unfold through daughter Judith's video camera, which subsequently becomes Exhibit A.

Director: Dom Rotheroe
Stars: Bradley Cole, Brittany Ashworth, Angela Forrest
Home Movie II (2008)
Drama | Horror | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

In the remote woods of Upstate New York, David and Clare Poe are attempting to live an idyllic life. However, their twin children's bizarre behavior might just tear the family apart.

Director: Christopher Denham
Stars: Adrian Pasdar, Cady McClain, Amber Joy Williams
Hollow I (2011)
Horror | Mystery | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

On holiday in the English countryside, two young couples uncover an ancient evil.

Director: Michael Axelgaard
Stars: Emily Plumtree, Sam Stockman, Jessica Ellerby
Zero Day (2003)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  

Two troubled adolescents chronicle the events that ultimately lead up to a terrifying assault on their school.

Director: Ben Coccio
Stars: Cal Robertson, Andre Keuck, Serataren Adragna
Crime | Drama | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

A quiet but disturbed young man puts the life of a woman he's obsessed with under a virtual microscope when he installs hidden cameras throughout her house.

Director: Eric Nicholas
Stars: Ana Claudia Talancón, Colin Hanks, Jordana Spiro
Drama | Horror | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.6/10 X  

A troubled evangelical minister agrees to let his last exorcism be filmed by a documentary crew.

Director: Daniel Stamm
Stars: Patrick Fabian, Ashley Bell, Iris Bahr
Horror | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

A young man in Romania goes to shocking extremes to convince Hollywood actress Anne Hathaway to star in his film.

Director: Adrian Tofei
Stars: Adrian Tofei, Sonia Teodoriu, Florentina Hariton
Blair Witch (2016)
Horror | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.4/10 X  

After discovering a video showing what he believes to be his vanished sister Heather, James and a group of friends head to the forest believed to be inhabited by the Blair Witch.

Director: Adam Wingard
Stars: James Allen McCune, Callie Hernandez, Corbin Reid
Drama | Horror | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  

A documentary filmmaker explores seemingly unrelated paranormal incidents connected by the legend of an ancient demon called the "kagutaba."

Director: Kôji Shiraishi
Stars: Jin Muraki, Rio Kanno, Tomono Kuga
Lake Mungo (2008)
Drama | Horror | Mystery
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.1/10 X  

A supernatural drama about grief.

Director: Joel Anderson
Stars: Rosie Traynor, David Pledger, Martin Sharpe
V/H/S (2012)
Fantasy | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.8/10 X  

When a group of misfits are hired by an unknown third party to burglarize a desolate house and acquire a rare VHS tape, they discover more found footage than they bargained for.

Directors: Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, David Bruckner, and 8 more credits »
Stars: Calvin Reeder, Lane Hughes, Adam Wingard


Complete credited cast:
Michael 'Mike' Williams (as Michael Williams)
Bob Griffin ...
Jim King ...
Sandra Sánchez ...
Waitress (as Sandra Sanchez)
Ed Swanson ...
Patricia DeCou ...
Mark Mason ...
Jackie Hallex ...


Three film students travel to Maryland to make a student film about a local urban legend... The Blair Witch. The three went into the woods on a two day hike to find the Blair Witch, and never came back. One year later, the students film and video were found in the woods. The footage was compiled and made into a movie. The Blair Witch Project. Written by Kevin Overstreet <GrndZero23@aol.com>

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis


Scary as hell. See more »



Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:



Official Sites:




Release Date:

30 July 1999 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

El proyecto Blair Witch  »

Box Office


$60,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$1,512,054 (USA) (16 July 1999)


$140,530,114 (USA) (5 November 1999)

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


The house that Heather is in during the opening shot is owned by Lonnie Glerum, the film's key production assistant. He is also operating the camera during the opening shot. See more »


In the house a red light flash (from a camera) can be seen though an open window. See more »


Heather Donahue: [walking up to Josh's car to greet him] Hey there! It's Mr. Punctuality! How the *hell* are ya this morning?
Josh Leonard: [getting out of car] Tired.
See more »

Crazy Credits

The beginning and end credits are designed in the style of a documentary, e.g. jumping slightly, static instead of rolling credits. See more »


Referenced in Almost Normal (2005) See more »


The Star Spangled Banner
Music by John Stafford Smith
Lyrics by Francis Scott Key (1814)
Sung a cappella by Joshua Leonard and Michael C. Williams
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

Tense, unsettling, original, intelligent, short, cheap.
3 November 1999 | by (Newcastle, Blighty) – See all my reviews

This film is not a feature film. For a start, it is not feature length, also, it is not shot on film. More importantly, it does not have what feature films have these days: star actors, special effects, exotic locations, explosions. Instead, seeing B.W.P. is seeing something else that a cinema can be: a place where people can share an intimate experience created by a few people on a tight budget. I would be glad of its success if only for that reason.

The first section of the film appears at first to be amateurish and slow. In fact, it is very deft, and very efficient at what it does. It tells the audience everything it needs to know about the characters and situation, and nothing more. Also, it gets the audience into the habit of viewing the film's format: alternating between black and white (very grainy and poorly focussed) film, and the washed out colours of shaky pixilated video. The film makers managed to set up a rationale for why the film is so cheaply made. Three people hike into the woods for a few days to shoot a documentary, with borrowed equipment, and are in the habit of videoing everything for the hell of it. They cannot carry tripods, steadicams, dollies, large lighting rigs, or the like, so everything we see is lit either by raw daylight, or by a single light fixed to the camera, which illuminates just what is within a few feet of the lens. The film creates its own excuse to be cheap. This is intelligent.

The acting and script are both excellent. The well-cast actors are presumably playing pretty-much themselves, and are convincingly naturalistic, and neither too likeable or too dislikeable. The slow route into hysteria is well documented. Rather than simply having a character say "We're lost!", we see many scenes which show the trio getting more and more hopelessly lost, and more annoyed with each other for this. By the time they are thoroughly lost, the audience shares the despair.

My friend and I, after seeing it, both felt a little sick. I put this down to my having been tense for a hour, he put it down more to motion sickness. The jerky, badly-framed camerawork is hard on the eye and stomach, but I applaud the director for its uncompromising use. Similarly, no compromise is made with the dialogue. Some of it is very quiet and must be listened for, some is technical jargon, which is left realisticly unexplained.

One of the great strengths and weaknesses of the film is the editing. It is good in that it does much to heighten the tension, with many key moments lasting just a little too long for comfort. Each time the characters find something nasty, the viewer is made to want the editor to cut soon to the next scene, and the fact that he doesn't adds to the sense of being trapped, as the characters are. The problem with this, though, is that one is left wondering about the motives of the fictional editor. In truth, of course, the film is edited to create these effects, and to entertain, but the film's rationale is that these are the rushes of a documentary put together posthumously by someone other than the film's original creator. Why, then, would an editor piecing together such footage, edit for dramatic effect rather than for clarity? Why would he keep cutting back and forth from the video footage to the film footage, when neither shows any more information than the other?

The film is stark. After one simple caption at the start, all that follows is the "rushes". I wonder if the film might not have been improved with an introductory section which documented how the rushes were found and edited. A programme was made for television which did this. Perhaps a portion of this might have been added to the film, making it more complete, and more believable (and proper feature length).

While I applaud the fact that young original film-makers have managed to create a mainstream hit out of a simple idea, well-handled. I dread the possible avalanche of inferior copies which may come.

Most horror films these days are created not for the audience, but for the makers. The departments of special effects, make-up, model-making, animation and so forth all try hard to show potential future employers what they can do. The result is that nothing is left for the audience to do, since everything can be seen and heard, and the viewer's imagination can be switched off. Today, it is possible to see pigs fly on the screen, and so film-makers show off and show us a formation of Tamworths, which is something which will look impressive in the trailer. To show us less is to make our minds fill in the gaps. This way, we create our own terrors, perfectly fitted to ourselves. The ghastly face I see in my head, is the ghastly head which I find scary. The ghastly face I am shown may be one I can cope with quite easily. If I see a believable character screaming in hysterical fear at something I cannot see, my own brain creates demons for my night's dreams, demons far more mighty than anything CGI graphics or a latex mask could portray.

This film will stay in your thoughts for some while.

269 of 378 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
I really hate to raise the prospect of sexism, but... jevicci
It's just not scary..... foxhound-37781
The performances are what make this film. dgdforever
Any more movies like this? BigBoss1984
Supposed the Witch is seen in the sequel... rrancier-90417
Mike or Josh alice-dukesohazzardfan
Discuss The Blair Witch Project (1999) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page