MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 15,393 this week

Titus Andronicus (1999)

 -  Drama | Horror
5.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.5/10 from 84 users  
Reviews: 9 user

A classic and intense horror/drama about the all consuming nature of revenge.

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 166 titles
created 21 Jul 2011
 
a list of 697 titles
created 04 Apr 2012
 
a list of 28 titles
created 08 Apr 2012
 
a list of 193 titles
created 5 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Titus Andronicus (1999)

Titus Andronicus (1999) on IMDb 5.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Titus Andronicus.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Candy K. Sweet ...
Lexton Raleigh ...
Aaron
Tom Dennis ...
Levi Tinker ...
Buddy Spafford ...
Casca
Alex Chew ...
Richard Porter ...
Marcus
Robert Reece ...
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Amanda Gezik ...
Lavinia (as Amanda Gezzik)
Ryan Martin ...
Edit

Storyline

A classic and intense horror/drama about the all consuming nature of revenge.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

William Shakespeare's Savage Epic of Brutal Revenge

Genres:

Drama | Horror

Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

(special edition)

Sound Mix:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Version of Titus Andronicus (1985) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

What the @#%! is this?...
9 April 2000 | by See all my reviews

OK, let's get something out of the way: this is a very faithful adaptation of Shakespeare's play. The only problem is, that's not a good thing. "Titus Andronicus" is, to my mind, Shakespeare's second-worst play, surpassed in awfulness only by "King John." The plot is ludicrous, the characters almost completely two-dimensional (especially the Moor Aaron, who is far more troubling from a racial standpoint than Shylock ever was), the dialogue perfunctory and awkward.

To be sure, Shakespeare on his worst day is better than the very best work of most other writers, but with so many superior Shakespeare plays to pick from, anyone who chooses to do an adaptation of "Titus" had better bring something interesting to the table. Julie Taymor's more widely-seen adaptation followed in the footsteps of Ingmar Bergman's stage production of "Hamlet" with its fusion of different time periods, in this case ancient Rome and contemporary Western civilization, to make a point about the anesthetization of violence in modern society.

But because this version is far more faithful to the text, it doesn't have any such aspirations; Shakespeare wrote the play simply because it was what the public wanted. Thus, this "Titus" is completely shallow, and to top it off, it's not even good from an aesthetic viewpoint. The film was obviously made on a limited budget, which shows in practically every frame: the costumes and sets are some of the worst I've seen since "Man of La Mancha," the acting is terrible (the dialogue would be better served by street mimes), and the gore effects -- which, if done right, could've made this at least mildly amusing -- Low-budget Bard isn't automatically bad -- see Welles' daring interpretation of "Othello" -- but the filmmakers here blow it at every opportunity. Naturally, this movie is destined to become a cult favorite, but definitely not for its quality.


6 of 17 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Titus Andronicus (1999) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?