IMDb > This Is Not a Test (1962)

This Is Not a Test (1962) More at IMDbPro »

This Is Not a Test -- (1962) Seamon Glass, Mary Morias. Social science fiction at its best. A state trooper stops people along a highway after hearing news of an impending nuclear attack...


User Rating:
5.6/10   492 votes »
Your Rating:
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
/10   (delete | history)
Sorry, there was a problem
Popularity: ?
Up 24% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Peter Abenheim (screenplay) &
Betty Laskey (screenplay) ...
View company contact information for This Is Not a Test on IMDbPro.
A highway patrolman stops motorists on a highway after he hears news reports of a possible nuclear attack. Full summary » | Add synopsis »
User Reviews:
Don't listen to them. See more (37 total) »


  (in credits order) (verified as complete)
Seamon Glass ... Deputy Sheriff Dan Colter
Thayer Roberts ... Jacob Elliot Saunders
Aubrey Martin ... Juney
Mary Morlas ... Cheryl Hudson
Michael Greene ... Joe Baragi (as Mike Green)
Alan Austin ... Al Weston
Carol Kent ... Karen Barnes
Norman Winston ... Sam Barnes
Ron Starr ... Clint Delany
Don Spruance ... Peter
James George Jr. ... Looter
Norman Bishop ... Looter (as Norm Bishop)
Ralph Manza ... Looter
Jay Della ... Looter
William Flaherty ... Looter
Phil Donati ... Looter
Doyle Cooper ... Looter

Directed by
Fredric Gadette 
Writing credits
Peter Abenheim (screenplay) &
Betty Laskey (screenplay) (as Betty Lasky) &
Fredric Gadette (screenplay)

Produced by
Murray De Atley .... producer (as Murray De'Atley)
Fredric Gadette .... producer
James Grandin .... executive producer
Art Schmoyer .... executive producer (as Arthur Schmoyer)
Original Music by
Greig McRitchie 
Cinematography by
Brick Marquard (director of photography)
Film Editing by
Hal Dennis 
Production Management
Gordon E. Gadette .... production manager (as Gordon Gadette)
Music Department
Greig McRitchie .... conductor
Crew verified as complete

Production CompaniesDistributorsOther Companies

Additional Details

USA:73 min
Sound Mix:

Did You Know?

The film debut of actor Michael Greene, never released theatrically.See more »
[first lines]
Deputy Sheriff Dan Colter:This is Colter. Give me a time check, please.
See more »


This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
42 out of 50 people found the following review useful.
Don't listen to them., 19 September 2007
Author: humbleradio from Tokyo, Japan

This is Not A Test is no masterpiece. But, it's not a bad movie either. In fact, I will argue that it's rather well made. 

It is essentially an elongated Twilight Zone episode combining elements of Martian in a Diner with The Shelter and Maple Street. 

Many here ridicule this film saying it's horribly done, bad acting, etc. This is wholly incorrect. Most self appointed experts on films commenting here and other places often complain in like deed and manner, using the same phrases and complaints. 

This film was shot, composed, scored, and sound recorded professionally, albeit with a lower budget than A pictures. 

This film was shot with skill. The sound is without any noticeable errors, drops, or sound asymmetry, with dialog, Foley, score, incidental music doing what they are supposed to do. Comparing this film to Ed Wood's is way off base. Wood's films are very poorly made (and lovable). 

Too many times, people trash old films making clichéd generalizations that it's 'crap' or 'shoestring budget' or has 'wooden acting' etc. I'd wager those who make such comments have never made a movie, or probably anything else creative in their lives, certainly not on a scale of a motion picture, even a lower budget one. Sorry, Youtube videos don't count. Such people, and we have a lot of them these days, find it easy to make such blanket statements. 

Ignore them. For it is the easiest thing in the world to ridicule something as if you are an authority, and it's the most foolish thing in the world to believe it. 

I'm not saying this film is great. It's classic B movie drive-in fare. But, that doesn't mean that skill wasn't involved, or that professionals didn't do their best with what they had to work with to put an entertaining picture on the big screen. I urge you, if you care, to just take any shot in the film, pick any one, or any scene, and look where the camera was placed, what angle, how is it composed? What can you see in the shot, does the camera move, and if so, is it smoothly done? How are the shots mixed? Does the variety of divergent shots create a feeling you can describe? How is the mixture of shots set up to build tension? Are close ups used? Long shots? Mid shots? Two shots? Overhead shots, low angles? Thru windows, around objects? Dolly shots? Crane shots? Moving vehicle shots? What shots were done in a studio? How many did it take to complete a scene?

How are the actors' eye lines? Do they match up, or are they looking in the wrong direction, wrong angle, wrong side of the frame? Do they move off their marks?

Did they flub their lines? How is the wardrobe? Do they look "wardrobed"? How about their hair? Does their hair change suddenly shot to shot, as is often the case when continuity is not managed well? 

How is the cutting? The editing? Does it make sense? Is it convincing that things are happening in real time, even though a 1 minute scene may have taken all night or one week or month of nights to shoot? Did the editor develop a rhythm within each scene, and an overall one for the entire story? Were sound bridges used, where actors' lines, or sound effects cross over visual cuts? Were many lines delivered off camera, so we can see reactions to the lines from the other players? 

How are the sound effects used? Are they convincing? Or out of sync? The crickets? Do they suddenly stop for no reason shot by shot, or are the sound effects consistently maintained? Is the police car radio convincing? How about the static from the other cars' radios? Door slams? Were they foleyed well? Do you see any mic booms? Light set ups? Can you even tell how they lit each scene, so we could see what we should see and not see what we shouldn't? There is no large lampposts, yet we believe we should see them. How is this violation of reality accomplished so the viewer doesn't have it ruin the illusion. 

The above is only the tip of the iceberg of what a filmmaker goes through for each second, each frame of film that is shot. Remember this is film, not video.

If you are the type of person who makes fun of B/W movies, old TV shows, music made before you were a teenager, then don't bother watching it. You've got greater issues to deal with and you need all the time you have left on earth to deal with them. 

If on the other hand you are one who has an open mind, and enjoys fun movies, then take a peak. You may like it. It may stay with you. You may surprise yourself. 

One of the worst things to ever happen to cinema, to old movies in particular (and all movies become old movies eventually) was Mystery Science Theater. Even though it was very funny, and a good concept - we often did the exact same thing in college way before MST did it, as did probably many of you out there - it cued many young people into thinking ALL old movies, ALL B movies should be made fun of. This was a dire mistake and has transformed into a tragedy. It has brought upon us an avalanche of cynical so-called experts who strive to elicit the end-all cut or put-down of such fare as This is Not A Test. 

The challenge in life is not to find things to ridicule, but rather to find the beauty in things others can't see, and maybe, with a little luck, show it to them. 

Good luck. 

Was the above review useful to you?
See more (37 total) »

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for This Is Not a Test (1962)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
With all due respect to Jim Rieken... ChrisO_01801
Is it complete? thegalaxybeing
See this wild flick for free ! GroovyChainsaw
Norman Winston? jahanson
See more »


If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
No Blade of Grass Threads Panic in Year Zero! The War of the Worlds The Day After
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
IMDb Drama section IMDb USA section

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.