IMDb > In Praise of Love (2001)
Éloge de l'amour
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

In Praise of Love (2001) More at IMDbPro »Éloge de l'amour (original title)

Photos (See all 9 | slideshow) Videos
In Praise of Love -- An artistic vision of love in this trailer for the Godard film


User Rating:
6.5/10   2,307 votes »
Your Rating:
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
/10   (delete | history)
Sorry, there was a problem
Popularity: ?
Up 3% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
View company contact information for In Praise of Love on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
16 May 2001 (France) See more »
In part one there is talk of a project on the subject of love, with the example of three couples, one young... See more » | Add synopsis »
2 wins & 3 nominations See more »
(4 articles)
Cinema at 33 1/3 Rpm
 (From MUBI. 1 June 2015, 4:49 AM, PDT)

Jean-Luc Godard won't travel to accept honorary Oscar
 (From The Guardian - Film News. 7 September 2010, 3:07 AM, PDT)

Asian films lead best-of-decade poll
 (From The Hollywood Reporter. 23 November 2009, 12:00 PM, PST)

User Reviews:
A masterpiece of reflection. See more (39 total) »


  (in credits order)
Bruno Putzulu ... Edgar
Cécile Camp ... Elle
Jean Davy ... Grandfather
Françoise Verny ... Grandmother
Audrey Klebaner ... Eglantine
Jérémie Lippmann ... Perceval
Claude Baignières ... Mr. Rosenthal
Rémo Forlani ... Mayor Forlani
Mark Hunter ... U.S. Journalist
Jean Lacouture ... Historian
Philippe Lyrette ... Philippe, Edgar's Assistant
Bruno Mesrine ... Magician
Djéloul Beghoura ... Algerian (as Djelloul Beghoura)
Violeta Ferrer ... Woman 1
Valérie Ortlieb ... Woman 2
Serge Spira ... Homeless Man
Stéphanie Jaubert ... Young Girl
Jean-Henri Roger ... Mayor Forlani's Aide
Lemmy Constantine ... U.S. Assistant
William Doherty ... U.S. Official

Hocine Choutri ... L'homme qui court
rest of cast listed alphabetically:

Marie-Françoise Audollent

Ludovic Berthillot ... Le clochard
Laurence Colussi
Marceline Loridan Ivens ... Woman in movie theatre
Noël Simsolo
Ysé Tran ... Maid
Marie Desgranges ... Woman on a bench in Paris (uncredited)

Directed by
Jean-Luc Godard 
Writing credits
(in alphabetical order)
Jean-Luc Godard 

Produced by
Alain Sarde .... producer
Ruth Waldburger .... producer
Cinematography by
Julien Hirsch 
Christophe Pollock 
Film Editing by
Raphaele Urtin  (as Raphaëlle Urtin)
Casting by
Stéphane Foenkinos 
Costume Design by
Marina Thibaut 
Production Management
Joseph Strub .... production manager
Second Unit Director or Assistant Director
Fleur Albert .... assistant director
Gilbert Guichardière .... first assistant director
Aurélien Poitrimoult .... first assistant director
Christophe Rabinovici .... assistant director
Sound Department
Olivier Burgaud .... boom operator
Gabriel Hafner .... sound
Christian Monheim .... sound
François Musy .... sound
Jean-Alexandre Villemer .... sound recordist
Camera and Electrical Department
Emmanuelle Collinot .... assistant camera
Léo Mac Dougall .... assistant camera
Olivier Regent .... gaffer
Editorial Department
Richard Deusy .... colorist
Music Department
Ketil Bjørnstad .... composer: stock music (as K. Bjornstad)
David Darling .... composer: additional music (as D. Darling)
Karl Amadeus Hartmann .... composer: stock music (as KA. Hartmann)
Maurice Jaubert .... composer: stock music (as M. Jaubert)
Arvo Pärt .... composer: stock music (as A. Part)
Georges Van Parys .... composer: stock music (as G. Van Parys)

Production CompaniesDistributorsOther Companies
  • L.T.C.  acknowledgement (as LTC)
  • S.I.S.  acknowledgement (as SIS)
  • VDM  acknowledgement

Additional Details

Also Known As:
"Éloge de l'amour" - France (original title)
See more »
Rated PG for thematic elements and brief language
97 min
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 See more »
Sound Mix:

Did You Know?

The movie posters seen when the characters go to the theater are for the Matrix and Pickpocket.See more »
Movie Connections:
L'AtalanteSee more »


This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
22 out of 24 people found the following review useful.
A masterpiece of reflection., 10 September 2002
Author: Phil Ed ( from Los Angeles

Be warned: It's not a movie! At least not in the way we commonly understand this word: it's not entertaining. And, don't be misled by the title, it's not a love story either. It's a reflection from one of the most important thinkers and intellectuals of our times, on age, memory, history, resistance, society, culture and sense of life. If you are familiar with Godard's always-experimental style, you'll be fine and leave the theater thinking of the questions he raised or more precisely, the questions he formalized for us. Godard is important because he always helps us to formalize concepts that are sometimes difficult to put in words. In his earlier films he has raised questions about love, relationship, adaptation to a changing society, rebellion and resistance. Now Godard is 71 and looks back at life reflecting, as an old man will, on memory and history, as a way to reclaim our lives (as a character says in the film) diluted if not stolen by our modern society. As he says all over the film "there is no resistance without history" and that is a very important statement, no matter which way you want to use it. Godard began resistance a long time ago as one of the founders of the French New Wave, defining a new art form by taking the camera into the streets, and shooting with direct sound as a way to tell the truth. (He used his camera to show life as it was, undiluted) Truth has always been one of his important fights. Not because he is a moralist but because he opposes the ones who try to make us believe that lies are the truth.

In"In Praise of Love" he uses the image of Spielberg and Hollywood, which steals history, diluting it and reclaiming it in a more convenient way. We see an American agent coming to buy the rights to the story of two French resistance fighters to make a movie, the way Spielberg made "Schindler's List". However, the reality is that the old woman actually betrayed her lover during the war then they reconciled and stayed together after words. Of course Hollywood would never show this type of betrayal, the separation or the reconciliation although this is the undiluted truth.

But as Godard says with humor, "North Americans don't have a name", "Mexicans are North American and they are called Mexicans, Canadians are North American and they are called Canadians", but North Americans don't have a name and it's why they have to steal other people's history to make their own. The same way the Nazis stole paintings from Jews during the war that another character in the film is trying to reverse by buying back the paintings. This desire for truth is emphasized by the main character, a director who is working on an uncertain project that may take the form of a film, an opera or a play where the only thing he knows is that it will be on the "four moments of love: the meeting, the physical passion, the separation, then the reconciliation." This same character is helping our director because he wants him to make something in his life "more than money". We now touch on Godard's resistance to the failure of a modern society that pushes people to commit suicide, as two characters in the movie do. We know everything has a price and is sold and bought: history as North Americans have, memory as the two resistance fighters do in order to fix their hotel, sex as a prostitute tries in the film, and of course, art. As an old man looking at his life, Godard wonders how "memory can help us reclaim our lives", in other words: who am I but a product sold and bought, manipulated and lied to? The present is filmed in beautiful black and white 35 mm and the past uses video images shown in even more beautiful saturated colors, similar to the way memory intensifies the past (All the young directors who made video their medium of choice, should take lessons from the old man!).

Godard's video images are a major source of emotions, and as his character says in the film: "emotions should bring events and not events emotions". Can memory then, as well as history, help us resist but even more, learn? Of course we should learn from history and memory, which the contemporary society tries to avoid, and here is the central subject of the film: becoming adult. As Godard explains, when we see a child or an old man in the street, we say here is child or an old man. We never say, here comes an "adult". Like North Americans, adults don't have a name they have stories to define them. But, at the end of their life what remains? Only stories or bits and pieces of a story like the film?

Yes, the film is made of bits and pieces, intercut by a black screen and people talking on top of each other. But isn't this the way life is?

It's an effort to get into the true message of the film. But thanks to Godard, truth doesn't come for less. The movie more than praising love, praises resistance, resistance to this mediocre culture which falsifies the truth and take us down to mediocrity with it. The style is as much an act of resistance than the content.

"In Praise of Love" is a masterpiece of reflection, to help us enter in resistance and look at ourselves. Cinema can't do much more than that.

Movies can't make a difference more than that. Let's hope that Godard will make movies

Was the above review useful to you?
See more (39 total) »

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for In Praise of Love (2001)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
This movie is deep higgs_boson
Music? cmcquain
Would a novel have been better? jessonderskov
A few minor points ddurand
Mark Hunter gillygoo
Reference to Juliette Binoche... higgs_boson
See more »

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Drama section IMDb France section

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.