American Masters: Season 14, Episode 1

Hitchcock, Selznick and the End of Hollywood (1 Nov. 1999)

TV Episode  -   -  Documentary | Biography | History
7.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.5/10 from 287 users  
Reviews: 3 user | 3 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 34 titles
created 02 Mar 2012
 
a list of 14 titles
created 11 Apr 2012
 
a list of 51 titles
created 01 Jul 2012
 
list image
a list of 45 titles
created 23 May 2013
 
list image
a list of 51 titles
created 10 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Hitchcock, Selznick and the End of Hollywood (01 Nov 1999)

Hitchcock, Selznick and the End of Hollywood (01 Nov 1999) on IMDb 7.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of American Masters.
« Previous Episode | 78 of 187 Episodes | Next Episode »
Edit

Cast

Episode credited cast:
David O. Selznick ...
Himself (archive footage)
...
Himself (archive footage)
...
Himself.
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
...
(archive footage)
...
(archive footage)
...
(archive footage)
...
(archive footage)
Michael Chekhov ...
(archive footage)
Paula Cohen ...
Herself
...
(archive footage)
...
(archive footage)
...
Himself - Narrator (voice)
Lois Hanby ...
Herself
Al Hirschfeld ...
Himself
Louis Jordan ...
(archive footage)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

1 November 1999 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Features Rebecca (1940) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A hatchet job, if ever there was one
7 January 2002 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

This documentary, part of the once-excellent "American Masters" series, details the conflict between Alfred Hitchcock, the greatest director of suspense thrillers who has ever lived, and David O. Selznick, legendary producer of many great films, and the man who brought Hitchcock to Hollywood. It is one of the most biased pieces of film-making I have ever seen.

Writer-director Michael Epstein seems intent on doing nothing better than portraying Hitchcock as a victim of the supposedly egomaniacal, compulsively meddling Selznick, who, according to Epstein, ruined numerous Hitchcock films while spending his career from 1940's onward trying to top his (Selznick's) monumental epic, "Gone With The Wind", and failing miserably at it. It then goes on to glorify Hitchcock as a creative genius (which he certainly was) who reached his full glory after breaking out of his association with Selznick.

Anyone who has read the excellent book "Memo from David O. Selznick", and seen the bulk of Selznick's films, will recognize that this notion is an amazingly idiotic one. Selznick may have been compulsive about writing memos, but anyone who reads them will realize that his films--notably "Gone With The Wind"-- would not have been as excellent as many of them were, had he not been so careful about every detail that went into them. (Selznick is also the man who gave the world the definitive films of "David Copperfield", "A Tale of Two Cities", "The Prisoner of Zenda", and "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer".)

In fact, in "Memo from David O. Selznick", there is a rather shocking memo which illustrates that Hitchcock's ideas were not always the ideas of an inspired genius--he was determined to deviate heavily from the plot line of "Rebecca" to insert his own dubious touches, such as a scene in which Maxim becomes seasick during his honeymoon with his new bride. Also dubious was Hitchcock's ill-judged attempt to try to name the nameless Joan Fontaine character Daphne, after Daphne du Maurier, author of the novel. (Maxim always calls her "darling", but never mentions her name, nor does anyone else.) Fortunately, Selznick wrote Hitchcock a blistering memo literally forcing him to stick as closely as possible to the original plot line of "Rebecca". In fact, those who see Selznick films adapted from literary works will notice that they are always meticulously faithful to their source.

Epstein writes about every post-1940 Selznick film as if it were a disaster, even such memorable ones as "Portrait of Jennie" and the vastly, vastly underrated Hitchcock film "The Paradine Case", a picture often criticized for being too "talky", and of not having any of Hitchcock's inventive visual touches, as if visual touches and unusual ideas were all there are to Hitchcock. And he barely mentions the fact that Selznick had a hand in the making of the excellent "The Third Man".

This documentary is not an objective, informative report--it is an attempt to glorify Hitchcock by taking the easy route of building him up at somebody else's expense.

I sincerely hope that "American Masters" begins to improve soon. It used to be one of the best, if not THE best, documentary series on the air. It seems as if making it a weekly series has compromised its quality.


4 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Where can I find this? Hkykix38
None Without Sin jumpinjosh49
A Duke Named Ellington DVD marlisda
Who was the narrator on the Gershwin documentary??? richmond-4
Atlantic Records PACman66
Marilyn Monroe jillgarnett

Contribute to This Page