MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 2,159 this week

Histoire(s) du cinéma: Fatale beauté (1997)

Video  -  Documentary | Short  -  January 1994 (USA)
7.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.4/10 from 492 users  
Reviews: 2 user | 9 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

(uncredited)
0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: October

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in October.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 28 titles
created 19 Jul 2011
 
a list of 31 titles
created 23 Jan 2012
 
a list of 52 titles
created 02 Aug 2012
 
a list of 131 titles
created 26 Aug 2012
 
a list of 817 titles
created 9 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Histoire(s) du cinéma: Fatale beauté (Video 1997)

Histoire(s) du cinéma: Fatale beauté (Video 1997) on IMDb 7.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Histoire(s) du cinéma: Fatale beauté.

User Polls

Photos

Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

In part one there is talk of a project on the subject of love, with the example of three couples, one young, one mature and the other elderly. At this point the author comes into contact ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Bruno Putzulu, Cécile Camp, Jean Davy
Documentary | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

Director Jean-Luc Godard reflects in this movie about his place in film history, the interaction of film industry and film as art, as well as the act of creating art.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jean-Luc Godard, Geneviève Pasquier, Denis Jadót
Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

Godard looks into the Bosnia conflict in the early 1990's.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jean-Luc Godard
Drama | Musical | Romance
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

Collection of short films the summaries of which include; a foreign man moving to Italy, getting married and having a child; a four split scene short involving plot-less images of old ... See full summary »

Directors: Bernardo Bertolucci, Claire Denis, and 6 more credits »
Stars: Amit Arroz, Valeria Bruni Tedeschi, Mark Long
Documentary | Music
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.4/10 X  

Godard's documentation of late 1960's western counter-culture, examining the Black Panthers, referring to works by LeRoi Jones and Eldridge Cleaver. Other notable subjects are the role of ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Sean Lynch, Mick Jagger, Brian Jones
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jean-Luc Godard, Serge Daney, Julie Delpy
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Alain Cuny, Juliette Binoche
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Documentary | Short
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  
Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

At a lakeside hotel, Michel Piccoli discusses the centennial of cinema with Jean-Luc Godard. Godard asks why should cinema's birthday be celebrated when the history of film is a forgotten ... See full summary »

Directors: Jean-Luc Godard, Anne-Marie Miéville
Stars: Fabrice Bénard, Patrick Gillieron, Jean-Luc Godard
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

experimental film | essay | See All (2) »

Genres:

Documentary | Short

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

January 1994 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

,  »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Edited from M (1931) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Mysteries of cinema, mysteries of life
28 March 2011 | by (Greece) – See all my reviews

In the final Histoires entry, Godard says "I understand better, why earlier I had such a hard time beginning, what voice had invited me to speak lodged itself in my discourse." This may refer to any number of beginnings, one of them I like to think is the false start of the Histoires films back in 1988.

Godard would like to enclose all of life in cinema, long shots and short shots, pans of nature and poses on deathbeds, but in those first two Histoires films I got the sense that it was slipping from his fingers. The greatest question then of a beginning of cinema is this, where and why do we start a shot, where and why do we end it? Where do we begin to see and where do we stop, and what kind of life have we seen inbetween? As it pertains to this chronicle of cinema, where do we begin to tell the story?

Godard finds premises in different things, the French New Wave included, but it's more important for me to see where these stories end, where the narrative thread is finally abandoned. It's always inwards, with introspection. This speaks as I see it of a desire for self-awareness, which he marvellously exhibits in films like Nouvelle Vague, but also an attempt of an intimate view of consciousness and soul, where all the formations of cinema are born.

When this really begins to matter for me, is when Godard abandons the intellectual analysis, and instead approaches cinema with a poet's sense of awe and wonder. How the person who looks from behind a camera looks upwards to imagine starstudded worlds beyond the ephemeral, and how that glance at the divine brings about a downfall of ideas. He laments that downfall from the idea to the base desire with pornographic shots of early stag films, other kinds of violence.

In the fourth Histoires, he solves for us the provocative claim that "cinema is not art, it's barely a technique". Cinema is a mystery, a mystagogy we participate in. The greatest despair of the artist then, the desperate attempt to build the imperishable and eternal from what perishes (sound, image), is at once a great dream and a great folly. Whereas once he was anxious to use cinema as a lever that participated in the discourse for a better society, now he contends himself with a flight into beauty. We take that for what we will.

Mysteries for me must exist unresolved, remain enigmatic otherwise they dissolve, so to what extent shall we pursue the mystery of cinema and can we hope for a measure of liberation?

Godard asks, how many films about babies, flowers, and how many about gunfire. If glory is the mourning of happiness, then the glamour of the show biz is a veil that masks something sinister. It's a mask, in the way that it obscures the true face of things. For 50 Cecil B. DeMille's, how many Dreyers? Another contradiction for Godard, but what's it worth? Perhaps the admission that cinema can obscure, with song and dance and violence, both what is good and what is bad. At this point I find myself questioning the mystery, if it can ever be means to something, or if we arrive at the core by peeling layers we find nothing.

One thing is for sure, the Histoires as a whole, clocking in at 4 hours, emerges not as just a history of cinema, it is hardly that, or a story of that history, of which it is but adequate, but as a story of Godard. That is, for what Godard regales us with, he rummages through cinema to find images that correspond. Now it's James Stewart jumping in water to save Kim Novak, now it's John Wayne on horseback.

It's not surprising then that these images exist, by which Godard projects his thoughts into cinema, because it's the primary reason these images exist in the first place, as a projection of thoughts, but that the notion of a story born of the abstract cinematic essentials, sound, image, motion, which can communicate the innermosts is possible.

This must be the triumph of cinema then. Not that it can mirror the macrocosm, address the grand ideas and elevate us to the divine (which is a chimera), but the profound ability to speak about the small things we consider true inside of us, individually, collectively. A shot of an anguished woman, stripped off context, retains its emotional power, which is to say that the context of narrative is firstly illusionary, foremostly that something exists embedded in the image which we cannot wrestle away by any means.

An image to haunt, the flickering face of Marilyn Monroe superimposed over shots of The Birds, black crows flowing out of her forehead, or inside of it. A state of mind emerges from the image, which is true both as an expression of the outside and as an impression of what's inside. The link of this, between thought and action, is karma. Godard here teaches what's possible of cinema, perhaps like no one else did before.

Godard saves the greatest realization for the end, a partial answer to the questions which haunted his mind an entire career. Only when life is lived in full, with all the forces available to our body, only then can life stop questioning itself and accept itself as the true answer. Mind is the great antagonist then, a chimera.

Thirtyeight years after Breathless, now I can be friends with Godard. This is a masterwork of cinema in my estimation, but I believe will be better appreciated as a work that flows from a career or life in progress, if we have a picture of who Godard was, who he came to be.


6 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
DVD Possibility - Take action fracturedelectricity
USA DVD catietodd
usa DVD catietodd

Contribute to This Page