|Page 6 of 41:||               |
|Index||403 reviews in total|
In the last time all horror movies were about banging doors, breaking trough windows and all that, but this movie is different. Ringu does not need screaming to scare and hunt the viewers, with an original style Ringu gives a experience unlike we have ever seen. Leaving all the fancy special effects found in occidental movies and taking the simplest route this movie delivers a thrilling and dark story that will shock viewers. The actors play excellent roles showing us that a movie dose not need big famous actors to be successful. I recommend this film to everyone, you should watch this movie before watching the American version which I did not like at all. The all classic horror genre is back, like The Thing. Great!!!
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I finally saw this movie late last night on VHS and was quite
impressed. I have not seen 'The Ring' so I have no basis for
comparison. But the eerie atmosphere and creepy video set the stage for
a good film. Surprised there were not many jump-at-you scare scenes
like most 'newer' horror flicks possess (usually failing to scare you).
There was one scene which actually made me stop breathing for a second. SPOILERS!! When Tomoko's mother is in her room talking with Ryuji and she points to where she found Tomoko dead- then yells "TOMOKO!" and rips the closet door open to see her dead daughter- scared to death. That was real unexpected. Great job!
The video got creepier and creepier the more they analyzed it. Of course the ever-progressing well scene and the final movie scene was the keystone to the scare factor. I thought the actors did a great job portraying real emotion and fright. The only time the acting got to me was the (SPOILERS!!!) well digging scene and Ryuji gets grabbed in the arm by the corpse and then proceeds to hug the slimy skeleton. Not very believable- I think she would have tried to get out of there damn fast.
The ending was awesome. The fingernails- or lack there of- was real unsettling. Overall- not too exciting- but if you are in the mood to get into a story and are vulnerable to being scared than this movie is a great pick. 7/10.
Based off a popular novel and has been Japan's most successful horror film
to date, RINGU is a well made movie that tests your nerves while you cheer
for the victims of the videocassette. I could never find the movie
completely plausible for the real world, but it was good enough to keep
suspense of a race-against-time thriller.
Urban legend becomes reality when four teens die a week after watching a videocassette while vacationing. The news prompts a reporter's curiosity, and ends up putting herself and her ex-husband in the same dire predicament.
The video is a grainy, strange yet disturbing one indeed. For a horror movie the pace is slow and tries to scare you by non-abrupt actions. It is a compliment nonetheless, but because RINGU is more movie than experience, you might cheer for the couple simply because they are in danger and not because you know them personally.
I first heard about this film when the American film, The Ring, was being advertised for release in theaters. I'm a curious sort, so of course I had to track down and see the original film ;) In my opinion, the original far outshines it's American counterpart; Japanese films tend to have more in the way of thought-provoking content. This film, in particular, makes you work to put the clues together; they don't hand everything to you on a silver platter. You have to think in order to understand the progression of events and the motivations behind a character's actions.. to me, that's the essence of a good movie. I've purchased a copy of this movie on DVD, and will continue to watch it as one of my all time favourites; I highly recommend that everyone find a way to watch it as soon as possible. It's an experience you won't soon forget.
A superb horror thriller from Japan, Ring somehow manages to be remarkably
unusual and innovative while at the same time stealing elements from
innumerable Western precursors. Visually, there are nods to Poltergeist,
Suspiria and Carrie while the plot borrows generously from
But Ring is the exact opposite of Hollywood's recent trend towards knowingly ironic, camp comedy-horror movies. This is a downbeat, serious movie full of a typically Japanese sense of fear and ambiguity, an interface between the modern, technological era and an earlier age of superstition, curses and vengeful ancestors. If Ring occasionally provokes sniggers rather than chills it's hard to know what to make of a film which pivots on the phrase Frolic in brine, goblins be thine,' for example - that's mainly because the film was made primarily with domestic Japanese audiences in mind. But even this foreign-ness' ends up as a plus, building up a genuinely unnerving sense of unpredictable dislocation.
Seeing Ring on the big screen not recommended, it is probably better on the small screen. This is because the plot pivots on the malign influence of a curse video,' its power the focus of a fictional, but entirely believable urban myth: after watching the video, the story goes, your telephone rings and a voice informs you that you have exactly one week left to live.
The story attracts the attention of divorced journalist Reiko (Matsushima) after four teenagers, including her cousin, simultaneously drop dead. She tracks down the tape, and watches its brief succession of bizarre, haunting images. Then the phone rings, and the film becomes a race against time as Reiko tries to exorcise' the curse, which soon extends to her surly ex-husband Ryuji (Sanada) and their young son, Yoichi (Nakatani) as they also view the tape. Ring shows an unusual attention to detail at every level, from Hayashi's multi-layered, evocatively cryptic script to Nakata's no-nonsense direction. The film has a deceptively flat, everyday look that contrasts all the more strikingly with the arty experimentalism of the curse video,' and the starkness of periodic black-and-white flashbacks - the rational world thus disrupted and subverted by impossible' manifestations of evil. Kenji Kawai's diverse score adds enormously to the growing impact of the story, as does the technique of announcing each new day with an on-screen title it's been done before in movies of all kinds, most notably The Shining but never with such skilful creepiness.
Though it works brilliantly as an intelligent thriller and the final two scenes wrap things up with a pair of especially satisfying twists Ring isn't just' a frightening horror picture. It subtly dramatises the tensions in a Japanese culture that, no matter how urgently it strides into a westernised, baseball-playing, high-tech future, can't quite shake off the insistent ghosts of its mystical past, just as Reiko is forced to abandon her air-conditioned, neon-lit Tokyo office and head to the countryside, then to a wild, wind-swept island, then into the very darkness of the earth itself, to confront the demons that threaten her very existence. And if many questions, many tensions, remain unresolved a sequel and a prequel have already been released in Japan that doesn't mean Ring is either inconclusive or a lazy cop-out. Like all the great horror directors, Nakata is primarily a collaborator. He starts the circle we finish it.
The American remake The Ring, starring Naomi Watts and Daveigh Chase was released in 2002.
Verdict: Easily better than most modern horrors, Ring is a spectacular chiller which is thought provoking, and nightmarishly original. *****
I was totally speechless to see what remakes are really. A week ago I saw Verbinski's "The ring" and I Was rather charmed by its David Lynch's atmosphere and incidentally one week later the original Japanese was on telly. Now do excuse me but I can't think of one good word from Verbinski's version simply as it is a copy...he just replaced the Japanese actors by Americans and for the rest, expect a better understandable ending, is the same. It's totally unfair to judge Ringu as I constantly was thinking now it will be that and now that simply as I watched it all before. What's better you say? Hmmmm perhaps the video that kills is better made but if you want to tell me truth...put some subtitles on the Japanese version and give the original makers the recognition they deserve rather than letting someone do a brainless copy.
Reiko Asakawa (Nanako Matsushima) is a young journalist with a divorced
husband, Ryuji (Hiroyuki Sanada), and a son, Yoichi (Rikiya Otaka). Her
niece, Tomoko, was recently found dead with a look of pure shock embedded in
her face as if something scared her to death. Upon learning that her niece's
three friends died at the same time, too, and hearing about a disturbing
videotape that is said to kill you seven days after watching it, Reiko comes
into the possession of that same tape. Now, as time grows short, Reiko and
Ryuji race to save their lives from impending doom and discover what the
tape has to do with a tragedy-stricken volcanic island and a very strange
little girl named Sadako (Rie Inou)...Great movie! Solid scares,
more-than-adequate performances, and a great, great ending!
I tracked this one down, having been impressed with the American version. Whether it is better or not remains in question, but what is not in question is the quality of this film. The film starts out with some nice tension from the beginning and carries it out till the very end. The Ring seems to be a scene by scene copy of this film till about two-thirds of the way, and then it makes some noticeable detours. I find that I enjoy both story lines equally. This film has some stellar acting and some very memorable scenery. What I did like about it was the differentiation of Japanese life from city to countryside. The film showcases the differing values and lifestyles with ease and strength. Ringu is also a beautiful film. The much talked about ending DOES seem to assume a sequel and DOES answer more of the viewer's questions. I heartily recommend watching this shortly after seeing The Ring.
I, like others was intrigued by the controversy surrounding Ringu and the remake, The Ring. Luckily, my sister's friend made us rent Ringu first. I say luckily, because, having seen both versions, I definitely think that the original is much better. Not only is it more subtle, but it explains things more fully than the American remake. The American remake seemed to be full of special effects and things that did not matter as much to the story. Everything in Ringu meant something. In fact, The Ring seemed to be one big attempt to keep Americans attention, as if we were two year olds who could not pay attention to something as wonderful as Ringu. I would most certainly give this film at least a 9 out of 10.
Ringu (1998) a film that inspired countless knock-offs and remakes
(official and unofficial) all over the world. A old fashion horror tale
about a vengeful ghost. Sadako is a scary but tragic figure, a victim
of greed and exploitation. She seeks revenge for all those that did her
wrong. Trapped in a dark damp well for many years she waits for that
day when she'll escape from her prison. I actually enjoyed this film.
The direction well good, the storyline made sense and the acting was
above average. A few cultural differences aside, the movie had an aura
of realism. You can view this film is many different aspects. I have
read Ringu and there are many differences. But I like the changes that
they made.The scares are genuine and the soundtrack is excellent.
Highly recommended. This is the film that raise the bar in horror
films. Often imitated by never duplicated (the American version noted).
Watch out for T.V.s, unmarked videotapes and wells!
P.S. Reiko's looking good.
|Page 6 of 41:||               |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||Newsgroup reviews||External reviews|
|Parents Guide||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|