IMDb > A Reasonable Man (1999) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
A Reasonable Man More at IMDbPro »

Write review
Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 3 reviews in total 

15 out of 16 people found the following review useful:

An excellent film on a universal dilemma.

10/10
Author: siri-4 from Brattleboro, Vermont
12 October 1999

Both white and black may be possessed by demons. These evil spirits needs to be removed. This unique film explores the depth of possession across two cultures, one a white lawyer, the other a black herdsman. Set in KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, with excellent trial scenes ennobled by Nigel Hawthorne as the judge, and one who is willing to search for truth and reconciliation. Five stars to Gavin Hood for developing the story and acting it to such perfection. Though based on a true event in 1933 this story is relevant to Southern Africa today and the new South Africa. A must for discerning film goers.

Was the above review useful to you?

17 out of 20 people found the following review useful:

A review of a great South African film

Author: Larry Schlesinger (larrys@inet.co.za) from Johannesburg, South Africa
12 November 1999

A Reasonable Man

Reviewed by Larry Schlesinger (for I-Net Bridge)

There has been a tendency in the past to judge locally made films on a different to scale to those that are made in Hollywood, or abroad. I must admit that I almost fell into the same trap when I began thinking about this exceptional film.

Gavin Hood who produced, directed, and wrote the screenplay for " A Reasonable Man", plays the lead character, Sean Raine. Raine is a corporate lawyer who through a series of events, while river rafting with his wife on a friend's farm, comes to the aid of a herdboy, Sipho Mtombelo. Sipho is accused of murdering a 1-year-old baby for the purpose of making African Muti, a powerful medicine for warding of evil spirits. Sipho, deeply disturbed by the ordeal, and locked up in a dank Johannesburg jail, claims that he believes he was killing the Tokoloshe, an evil African spirit, much feared by the local tribesman.

Sean has met the herdboy earlier in the day. He and his wife are nearly trampled by Sipho's herd of cattle, while sleeping on the riverbank. Sean takes on his case, not believing that this gentle boy could be guilty of such a heinous and viscous crime, even though he is caught with a bloodstained hatchet in his hand.

Raine and the viewer descend into the world of witchcraft and African mysticism, as he undergoes an exorcism of his own soul, while trying to save Sipho. It soon becomes clear that Raine has personal reasons for taking on the case, his own demons still plague him from his days as a bush shoulder in the Angolan War. This inter-weaving of plots and character give the film it's rich texture and depth, and also serves to raise it up above the purely "courtroom drama", which it never becomes.

Raine visits a witchdoctor, at dawn, driving his polished green landrover through the dusty township. He plays the part of the civilized and educated white man, believing that he can understand African beliefs, merely by asking questions. He soon finds out that he cannot understand Sipho's beliefs, unless he incorporates them into his psyche. The witchdoctor says to Sean: " You are a white man in African and you are cursed. There is a snake inside of you". What follows is a gruesome and disturbing exorcism as Raine's must first cleanse himself of his own evil spirits and demons The point being made here is obvious. African beliefs cannot be tossed aside because they are old. The relentless modernization of society cannot bury the deep African roots that have guided the tribes of African since the dawn of time. A white man must choose between being an African or remaining an outsider forever

Nigel Hawthorne represents this colonial past as he gives a superb performance as the crusty judge. He has an understanding of African witchcraft, but it is a narrow and limited view and he struggles to find a place for it in his civil and educated set of values. However he does raise some serious and telling points of debate. The judges argument is that a man cannot be merely excused of his actions because he holds certain beliefs which result in the death of an innocent child, whether the child is believed to be a Tokoloshe or not. A man may believe as he wishes, and act according to his beliefs, but he shall be held accountable for these actions by the legal requirements of a modern Judeo-Christian society. Otherwise, the judge says, the leaders of the apartheid government could be excused of their actions because they were based on a set of firmly held beliefs, no matter how sick they may seem to society. This is an excellently argument, and one which Sean Raine has failed to consider in his defense plea.

On the other hand, it is unfair to judge traditional beliefs by western standards. In one of the few humorous episodes, the witchdoctor is put on the stand, as is asked about her experience in her profession. Eventually she gets annoyed by the prosecuting attorney (superbly played by Vusi Kunene) who wants to know what her education is, and says: " I am not a professor of witchcraft". She has been educated, but not in a school. An elder sangoma has trained her in the practice of healing by using the spirits of the ancestors, and the point is made that not all knowledge is to be found in school and libraries. This testimony of the witchdoctor contrasts with that of the university professor who has studied African witchcraft, not to understand it, but to document its savagery. This contrast is just one of the many ways that Hood as director sets up the multi-cultural battleground upon which the story unfolds.

A Reasonable man is well made, with superb performances by a largely local cast of actors, including some of South Africa's finest - Michael Richards, Graham Hopkins, and Ken Gambu, to mention a few.

By any set of standards, it is a deeply moving and disturbing film that taps into the marrow of South Africa's rainbow nation, and is a sure of sign of the great stories that our local filmmakers have to tell.

Was the above review useful to you?

7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:

This movie IS Gavin Hood.

8/10
Author: Pingo-2 from Sweden
26 February 2005

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

I had read some about this movie before I watched it, so the very first scenes made me directly understand WHY the character Gavin Hood plays does what he does.

But I didn't think I would be surprised after this. I thought I had spoiled the film by reading about it, but I was wrong.

The story is simple, about a teen-aged boy killing an infant. The thing itself is so gruesome that you immediately think he actually did it, and don't question it much more... But the story is so well setup that you, after a while, start to question things.

Gavin Hood wrote, directed, produced and also plays the lead. I must say his strength is writing and second direction. He is not a super-perfect actor, at least not in the opening scenes, but after a while his rather flimsy approach is very nice.

The really good part of this film is the judge, perfectly played by Nigel Hawthorne.

I was surprised by this film. Many times. Not only did it portray the witch-doctor scenes with a crispy clear camera, so it felt like witch-doctor stuff in the 90's, it also portrayed everything else with such a realism that the movie felt more like a drama documentary than a feature film. Sometimes I felt like if this had actually happened.

If I understand correctly, the movie IS based on some actual court cases (but not one specific).

I enjoyed this calm and bright little movie. It's a film that makes you think about many things, and in the same time question your own beliefs and your own standards. The fact that it is set in South Africa of course brings out the race questions - and they too are there, but only on a secondary level, which is, perfect.

Great movie. 8 of 10.

The only bad things about it is that it could have used a slightly higher budget to make things look a little bit more "big". Other than that, most is great.

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings Awards
External reviews Plot keywords Main details
Your user reviews Your vote history