MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 5,839 this week

Divide and Conquer (1943)

 -  Documentary | History | War  -  1943 (USA)
7.2
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.2/10 from 330 users  
Reviews: 5 user

The World War II US Government account of the European theatre of the war from after the English and French entry to the fall of France.

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 2005 titles created 3 weeks ago
 
a list of 1673 titles created 13 Oct 2011
 
a list of 159 titles created 31 Jul 2011
 
a list of 5779 titles created 5 months ago
 
a list of 1825 titles created 6 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Divide and Conquer (1943)

Divide and Conquer (1943) on IMDb 7.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Divide and Conquer.
2 wins. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Knox Manning ...
Narrator
Edit

Storyline

In this episode of the Why We Fight propaganda series, the events from the English and French declarations of war against Nazi Germany to the conquest of France by the Nazi. In detail, we learn of how a combination of innovative Nazi military tactics and the work of traitors allowed the conquest of much of Central Europe. Written by Kenneth Chisholm <kchishol@execulink.com>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

1943 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Why We Fight, 3  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(RCA Sound System)|

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

This documentary is considered a Second World War wartime propaganda documentary film of the United States. See more »

Goofs

Some of the film of the invasion of Norway show Italian bombers attacking British ships. The Italian Air Force was not involved in the invasion of Norway. See more »

Connections

Follows Prelude to War (1942) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Not much historic value.
6 June 2006 | by (Minffordd, North Wales) – See all my reviews

It's hard to believe that Americans needed any propaganda in the Second World War to encourage them to support the fight against Nazism. However, up until Pearl Harbour, this was the case. Many Americans took an isolationist attitude, believing that events in Europe were none of their business. Some German-Americans and others formed Bund Societies, actively supporting the Nazi cause! Of course, all this changed on 7 December 1941...

'Divide and Conquer' is rather pale propaganda, intended to stir up American support for the fight against Hitler. While the cause is admirable, this is weak stuff. We see newsreel footage of Hitler making radio speeches in German, calmly assuring Denmark and Holland that they have nothing to fear from Germany. Then we see footage of German ships and tanks invading those nations.

Walter Huston, as the primary narrator, commendably avoids histrionics, but unfortunately reads his lines from a script which requires him to editorialise, telling us how evil and untrustworthy Hitler is. The events ought to speak for themselves. At one point, we are treated to a brief and utterly gratuitous snip of footage depicting bank-robber John Dillinger glowering at the camera, so that Huston can compare Dillinger to Hitler. That's a bad choice: in the 1940s, many Americans considered the late Dillinger a sort of folk hero.

The most interesting parts of this film are the clips of German battle footage, apparently captured by Allied forces. We also see footage of 'undesirables' in occupied France being loaded into tumbrels by their Nazi captors and driven hell-knows-where. What makes this footage powerful is the fact that we see the same faces in more than one shot, forcing us to realise that each of these faces is a specific human being with a real history and a past ... though perhaps not much future.

There are some extremely crude animation sequences, depicting arrows moving across Europe to indicate the Nazi advance. These animations were made very inexpensively, and look it, but perhaps that's a point in their favour. The Nazis spent a huge amount of money on 'Kolberg', a ridiculous propaganda film which required them to divert forces and materiel from the western and eastern fronts. By spending so very little money on 'Divide and Conquer', perhaps the U.S. government was able to spend a bit more on feeding the troops who had to win the war. Bless you all, band of brothers.

'Divide and Conquer' has very little to offer as cinema, and even less to offer as history: if you want to learn about the Second World War, this film is not remotely one of the best places to start. This film has outlived its usefulness ... but only because the Good Guys won that war: a victory which may have happened partially because of the G.I.s depicted in this film. God bless America, but I'm being generous when I rate this dull documentary. Just 4 out of 10, then.


1 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Divide and Conquer (1943) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?