Smart, Subversive, Contrived, and Forever Open for Debate, 6 March 2003
Author:
David H. Schleicher from New Jersey, USA
"American Beauty" is one of those rare and audacious films that begs the
question, "what defines art?" I don't think there is a film that received
better pre-release hype, more overwhelming praise when it was released, and
more cries of "FINALLY!" when it swept the Oscars. Yet it has spawned some
of the most heated backlash of any film in recent memory. Does the fact
that it has created so much debate make it art? Maybe.
This is a film that subverts the traditional American ideal of suburban
life. The moments of "conversation" at the dinner table are both the most
horrific and funniest moments ever put to film. They resonate at both ends
of the spectrum because they ring so true. Who hasn't been a part of or
witnessed such tantrums at the dinner table, a place where families are
supposed to connect and rejoice in their everyday life? Does this type of
subversion define art? Maybe.
This is a film that was very deliberate in its direction. Plastic bags and
rose petals have never been more beautifully shot, or more pretentious.
Suburban streets have never looked this good, and white picket fences never
whiter. But again, there's something crackling under the veneer, both of
this film, and of the life it depicts. Is this what art is supposed to do?
I think so.
The performances are phenomenal from Spacey and Benning. The script is
ultra smart and ultra clever, but in the end probably too contrived. Was
the message of the film that our "American dream" is also too contrived,
just like this movie? Or was the message that even suburban schmucks like
Lester Burnham deserve a chance to live out an authentic life of their own
choosing? We may never know. I actually think that twenty or thirty years
from now this movie will be looked upon as one of the all time greats by
critics, with the then modern-day audiences perplexed and asking, "why?"
That, my friends, is art.
Watch it at Amazon
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
American Beauty (1999) More at IMDbPro »
Smart, Subversive, Contrived, and Forever Open for Debate, 6 March 2003

Author: David H. Schleicher from New Jersey, USA
"American Beauty" is one of those rare and audacious films that begs the question, "what defines art?" I don't think there is a film that received better pre-release hype, more overwhelming praise when it was released, and more cries of "FINALLY!" when it swept the Oscars. Yet it has spawned some of the most heated backlash of any film in recent memory. Does the fact that it has created so much debate make it art? Maybe.
This is a film that subverts the traditional American ideal of suburban life. The moments of "conversation" at the dinner table are both the most horrific and funniest moments ever put to film. They resonate at both ends of the spectrum because they ring so true. Who hasn't been a part of or witnessed such tantrums at the dinner table, a place where families are supposed to connect and rejoice in their everyday life? Does this type of subversion define art? Maybe.
This is a film that was very deliberate in its direction. Plastic bags and rose petals have never been more beautifully shot, or more pretentious. Suburban streets have never looked this good, and white picket fences never whiter. But again, there's something crackling under the veneer, both of this film, and of the life it depicts. Is this what art is supposed to do? I think so.
The performances are phenomenal from Spacey and Benning. The script is ultra smart and ultra clever, but in the end probably too contrived. Was the message of the film that our "American dream" is also too contrived, just like this movie? Or was the message that even suburban schmucks like Lester Burnham deserve a chance to live out an authentic life of their own choosing? We may never know. I actually think that twenty or thirty years from now this movie will be looked upon as one of the all time greats by critics, with the then modern-day audiences perplexed and asking, "why?" That, my friends, is art.
2489 comments in total
Add another comment
Related Links