188 out of 243 people found the following comment useful :- A monumental film, 17 December 2003
Author:
Chris Docker (eyeforfilm) from Scotland, United Kingdom
Feeling weary and battle-worn, I have just staggered out of the cinema
after
three and a half hours of special effects creatures fighting other
special
effects creatures. I had taken refreshments but barely touched them -
probably because the film I had watched is one of the most mesmerising,
evocative, inspiring, and awesome I have witnessed of any big adventure
epic. Not to mention superb ensemble acting, moods that shift
effortlessly
between mediaeval battles of colossal proportions and convincing
bloodshed,
beauty and wonderment, fantastic natural and artificial landscapes and
cityscapes, touches of humour, well-paced dramatic tension, and human
bonding that is moving enough to just let you dry your eyes as the
unassuming credits flash by.
Return of the King is the greatest of the Tolkien trilogy by New Zealand
director Peter Jackson. Although I've seen the other two and read the
book,
I felt it would also stand alone well enough for people who hadn't done
either.
The storytelling is much more professional that the first one - which
maybe
laboured to introduce so much information - or the second one - which has
little let up from the tension of long battle scenes. In Return of the
King,
there is an emotional sting at the start, as we watch the transformation
of
Gollum from warm, fun-loving guy to murderous, mutated wretch. The movie
then moves deftly between different segments of the story - the sadness
of
the lovely soft-focus Liv Tyler as fated Arwen whose travails and woman's
love succeeds in having the Sword that was Broken mended, the comradeship
of
Sam and Frodo (Sean Astin & Elijah Wood) that is tested to the limits,
the
strong commanding presence of Gandalf (Ian McKellen) who keeps an eye on
things whilst turning in an Oscar-worthy performance, the ingenious and
very
varied battle scenes, and the mythical cities of that rise out of the
screen
and provide key plot elements.
This is a fairy story of human endeavour, the defeating of power cliques
and
the triumph of the human spirit that could almost be compared to Wagner's
Gotterdammerung. It is a fairy story without any sugary sweetness, a
fairy
story the likes of which hasn't been told so well before, and is even
unlikely to be done so well in the future. The haunting scream of the
Nasgul
stays with you, the physical attractions are not airbrushed, and the
battles
are about as far from pantomime characters waving wooden swords as you
can
get. The ingenious monsters keep you on the edge of your seat. The whole
narrative maintains the spirit (if not archival, detailed accuracy) of
the
original and makes you want to read the book (or read the book
again!)
The worst I can say about it is that it is maybe a tad long - but not
that
you'd notice . . .
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) More at IMDbPro »
188 out of 243 people found the following comment useful :-

A monumental film, 17 December 2003
Author: Chris Docker (eyeforfilm) from Scotland, United Kingdom
Feeling weary and battle-worn, I have just staggered out of the cinema after three and a half hours of special effects creatures fighting other special effects creatures. I had taken refreshments but barely touched them - probably because the film I had watched is one of the most mesmerising, evocative, inspiring, and awesome I have witnessed of any big adventure epic. Not to mention superb ensemble acting, moods that shift effortlessly between mediaeval battles of colossal proportions and convincing bloodshed, beauty and wonderment, fantastic natural and artificial landscapes and cityscapes, touches of humour, well-paced dramatic tension, and human bonding that is moving enough to just let you dry your eyes as the unassuming credits flash by.
Return of the King is the greatest of the Tolkien trilogy by New Zealand director Peter Jackson. Although I've seen the other two and read the book, I felt it would also stand alone well enough for people who hadn't done either.
The storytelling is much more professional that the first one - which maybe laboured to introduce so much information - or the second one - which has little let up from the tension of long battle scenes. In Return of the King, there is an emotional sting at the start, as we watch the transformation of Gollum from warm, fun-loving guy to murderous, mutated wretch. The movie then moves deftly between different segments of the story - the sadness of the lovely soft-focus Liv Tyler as fated Arwen whose travails and woman's love succeeds in having the Sword that was Broken mended, the comradeship of Sam and Frodo (Sean Astin & Elijah Wood) that is tested to the limits, the strong commanding presence of Gandalf (Ian McKellen) who keeps an eye on things whilst turning in an Oscar-worthy performance, the ingenious and very varied battle scenes, and the mythical cities of that rise out of the screen and provide key plot elements.
This is a fairy story of human endeavour, the defeating of power cliques and the triumph of the human spirit that could almost be compared to Wagner's Gotterdammerung. It is a fairy story without any sugary sweetness, a fairy story the likes of which hasn't been told so well before, and is even unlikely to be done so well in the future. The haunting scream of the Nasgul stays with you, the physical attractions are not airbrushed, and the battles are about as far from pantomime characters waving wooden swords as you can get. The ingenious monsters keep you on the edge of your seat. The whole narrative maintains the spirit (if not archival, detailed accuracy) of the original and makes you want to read the book (or read the book again!)
The worst I can say about it is that it is maybe a tad long - but not that you'd notice . . .
2896 comments in total
Add another comment
Related Links