Memórias Póstumas de Brás Cubas (2001) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Good adaptation of the classic book
Rodrigo_Amaro27 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"Memórias Póstumas" is based on the groundbreaking book written by Machado de Assis, the literary translation being "Brás Cubas's Postume Memories" but known around the world as "Epitaph of a Small Winner". The book is as much revolutionary as "Madame Bovary" was for the Realism movement in France and in the world. Created the Realism in Brazil, in 1881, throwing away the melodramatic and "too happy" Romantism and placing realistic emotions, sensations, giving a new life to books and stories; and it is highly regarded as the greatest book ever written by Brazilian's greatest writer.

André Klotzel took a giant chance while adaptating this book into film, a difficult task but he succeed in it. It is faithful to the written work, added a few things to make it easier to the contemporaneous viewers, since Assis books while are amazingly well written are also not so appealing to everybody, it's a difficult reading that works with irony, hidden messages, everything's too subtle to get in one reading. Art direction and costumes are well made; the story is presented just like in the book and the acting is very good.

Here, we follow flashbacks of Bras Cubas (played by Reginaldo Faria while older, and Petronio Gontijo while younger) lives, narrating his story from the moment of his death, bringing back to life some important moments of his life, how did he fell in love with Virgilia; the remedy he wanted to create to save the world and become famous; well, it's his life story. This is the story of a deceased author, and not of an author deceased as he explains, and we follow him, this semi-charming presence taking us back to small moments of his life, and now that he's dead he can say whatever he wants, without pity or embarrassment, who can judge him after all?

Bras Cubas reveals his thoughts about love, success, beauty, defects, and his bitter vision of what life is yet in a comical, sometimes romantic approach but without happy endings. I liked the film more than the book (which is unmemorable at parts, but it's a classic, and literates must read it. I read more recently for the second time at college's request while studying the author. The first time was because Woody Allen revealed that he read the book and loved it, and I got curious to see what Woody saw in it that was so good). But the book and the film are a little bit pointless. Shame on me saying this but it is; our greatest (to me, hugely overrated!) book of all time is pointless, because it says that life is pointless, the love of our live will be gone because we are cowards to fight for it in the time we have to fight for it, things will not be so great in life because we are cowards and don't do anything to change this. Here's a guy who died, without getting marry or having sons; without friends (the only ones at his funeral were there because he paid them); there's no real relations of friendship or love, people only have those relations if it involves money. Relations are built of interests and that's it. Love or whatever are science-fiction invented by melodramatic writers and screenwriters to make us feel important, glad that there's something at the end of the rainbow waiting for us, when in fact, we're all us in the gutter trying to raise above on people's shoulder to survive and not reach the bottom.

Well, looks like I contradict myself in saying that is a pointless work. It's not so pointless or meaningless but you need to have the ability of read between the lines, see what it's not said and make an judgment on that. And I guess that's why the film succeed it, it really said few things but we gather up with more at the conclusion, it makes us think about life itself and see how contradictory we are (an notorious example is when Bras sees the beautiful girl he fell in love with, but he forgets her simply because she has a difficult of walking. "Why she's beautiful if she's cripple? Why cripple if she's beautiful?").

Reginaldo Faria is impeccable playing the narrator of Bras story, a very convincing and funny character, and he has the best moments in the film where he could read the exactly lines of his character in the book (the beginning is totally faithful). Supporting cast is okay, but for some reason their voices sounded dubbed or very different from what they really are, don't know what was that.

If possible read the classic book and watch the film to get a higher understanding of what really this is. 8/10
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
entertaining, but without a climax
andre-7123 February 2001
This film takes you back to 19th century Brazil. The dead main character guides us through several periods of his life with a subliminal humor. He admits some secrets he did not dare to tell anybody during his lifetime. In this, I really got to like the leading character. The cast for this rather episodical movie was very convincing and well chosen. But, while drifting through the story, I had expected to get to any sort of a climax at some point. Unfortunately, there was none. Nonetheless, I left the cinema quite amused. Nice to see, if you like old costumes and an easy story. I give 7/10.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Having a climax would screw the plot
fapc6661 May 2007
It's obvious it has no climax, the plot is about NOT having a climax. The main DEAD character, Cubas, is using such subliminal humor in a way to show some kind of regret for having built NOTHING solid during his life time. His existence was EMPTY. He just lived and died. That is why there is no climax! This is no bla-bla-bla-oh-there-should-be-some-happy-yap-yup-climax-honey romance, this is realism! Having a climax would screw the entire plot! The movie might not be perfect in showing this the way the novel does, but it does, and if you didn't noticed, well, you should then just read Brás Cubas's Posthumous Memories, the novel, by Machado De Assis. You won't regret.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very good and funny!
cmapbh5 October 2002
It´s a very good movie. The director was very faithful with the book "Mémorias Postumas de Brás Cubas", but as the book, the movie is too deep and have a lot of signs that makes the movie be a little non sense to the foreigners and the Brazilians that didnt study at school about the writer.

Reginaldo Faria is perfect playing Brás Cubas, he gives the exactly kind of humor - ironic- that the character demands. The music and the way to pass the time is very dynamic and interesting. The movie can be funny for the most of the people, but for the ones that read the book is just perfect!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mas era coxa!
ana_kephra1 July 2007
Oh, well! First time I saw this I was in high school. I've read the book a thousand times before, and I was kinda afraid of the potential movie disaster, but this and lots of other movies proves that only Brazilian can make a movie based on a novel that would satisfy any of the previous readers! As said before, having no climax is just point of the story, so that's a completely invalid statement. Reginaldo Farias couldn't have done a most accurate picture of Brás, and the sarcasm is everywhere. There may be moments in the book that no images can explain, but still, that's as perfect as it could ever get! Just a great movie.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great and funny
julianasphynx14 March 2023
"After he died, in the middle of 1869, Brás Cubas decided to narrate his story and revisit the most important facts of his life, in order to distract himself in eternity. From then on, he remembered friends like Quincas Borba, his careless academic training in Portugal, the loves of his life and the privilege he had of never having to work in his life".

I found it much better than the book, as it doesn't get lost in scenario descriptions and brings the viewer much closer to the main character. It even has a comedic tone that works much better in this format than in reading.

This film turns out to be more focused on the personal drama of the character, not being a comedy per se but having very funny moments.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed