| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Index | 73 reviews in total |
Wow! I'm surprised to see so many negative and lukewarm opinions on this
movie, which I had never heard of (apparently it was not highly promoted by
the studio) but which I luckily stumbled upon on an international flight. I
so thoroughly enjoyed it that now I'm interested in more by director Peter
Chan and screenwriter Maria Maggenti. I did not know there was a book,
either, but I've made a note of it for future reading, too.
I admit I feel a bit defensive now, in the face of the other comments here
on IMDB. So, what did I like and why did I like it? First of all, unlike
some other viewers, I thought the movie WAS very funny. It takes sort of a
Steve-Martinesque view of the tender absurdity of humans and their feelings
about each other (OK, OK, I just saw a stage production of Picasso at the
Lapin Agile, and the tone reminded me somewhat of this). Although there is
physical humor, too, what I liked most were light touches, like how Ellen
DeGeneres' character instantly, wordlessly went back to working for her boss
(played by Kate Capshaw) as soon as she got the apology she felt she
deserved -- after insisting with great finality that it was all over.
I also felt this film was a celebration of the beautiful but almost lunatic
breadth and diversity of the kinds of feelings we group together under the
heading of "love": everything from young (and older) wide-eyed lust, to
slow steady enduring commitment. As well as friendships, coworker
relationships like the one just mentioned, family bonds . . . the list goes
on.
Most of all, I guess I appreciated the fond, loving tone of the movie. The
artists seem really to like, and love, people. Yes, there ARE quite a few
characters, and they're all different ages and different sexes, they're
about different trials and tribulations, but they're all treated with
light-hearted love and respect, for the sometimes silly but vulnerable
beings we all are.
So, if YOU like people, I think you'd like this movie.
This film was panned by critics, all of whom were male.
This is a wonderful little film with fun, funny and realistic characters,
and an interesting, romantic story that will touch the inner romantic in
all
of us. It's not laugh-out-loud funny, but it is pleasant to watch these
characters interact and is very fun to watch.
And for the guys, Kate Capshaw isn't bad to look at, either.
'The Love Letter' is quite a gentle breezy sort of romantic comedy- drama. It's about opportunities that are missed because people aren't more forward about their feelings. The humour isn't wacky like in most American films. Assuming the director's seat, Chan does quite a good job of portraying the small dockside town and introducing its quirky characters. The story interestingly intertwines the lives of the characters through a love letter. The dialogues are pleasant and the acting is quite good. Kate Capshaw does a good job of carrying the film and maintains a good chemistry with her co-stars. Tom Everett Scott fits the part.It was odd to see Danner play Capshaw's mother because the age difference did not seem believable enough. Tom Selleck was alright. Ellen Degeneres and Geraldine McEwan are scene stealers. In addition, I was amazed by the whimsical soundtrack that flows beautifully with the film, pumping some energy into it and would work well as a standalone score. IU felt the film would have benefited more had their been more comedic situations. At times it gets too serious and that needed to be toned down a little. I liked how it ended without showing the two lovers kissing (as has been evident in x number of rom-coms) but instead suggesting a promising future for them together. 'The Love Letter' was a pleasant watch, a kind of slice of life film.
This is not typical Hollywood cookie cutter love story. The tone and style reek of French cinema (although it doesn't seem to be a remake). There are some lovely performances, and exquisite scenes. I found myself smiling a lot throughout this movie, and will look out for more of the directors work. Plus anything that gives Geraldine McEwan work is to be supported.
This film shows up on the premium cable channels quite often and, I
find that I keep watching it over and over again. The performances are
wonderful, and the material has so much happening that there is always
something new to take away from the film.
Maybe I am too often distracted when watching films at home, you know
the drill, the dogs bark, the phone rings, the popcorn finishes during
the credits. But this film is about people and what motivates us, what
enlivens us, what causes rifts between us, and what inspires us.
For me, it is films like The Love Letter that keep me taking a chance
on new films. Frankly, I am surprised that the film is not better
known. I would love to see Blythe Danner and Geraldine McEwan in many
more roles. They are a delight to watch. Kate Capshaw is wonderful and
I had no previous idea that she would be. Ellen DeGeneres plays a role
that is much more complex than simply being the comic relief.
This film provides interesting visuals as a proper background to the
characters and their interactions. I find it refreshing every time I
take the time to watch it.
An exceptionally well-done film. Not Hollywood-ish, thus some mixed reviews. But I've viewed this 4 or 5 times, and love it. The editing and pacing are unusually synced to produce the feel of a special film. the music is a big plus. This is a gem to recommend to people who love good film, not those who want yet another blockbuster. Allow yourself the time and focus to move to the same pace, and you'll be rewarded. And the fact that the locus is a bookshop, the home of books which are similarly low-tech and rewarding is a fine match
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
We avoided watching this movie when it was released commercially, even
though we had read Cathleen Schine's novel in which this movie is based
on. Director Peter Chan's take on the story looks good on the screen;
what with the picturesque setting of Rockford, Ma., as the background
and all the cute houses where the story takes place. The result is a
film that is easy on the eye, but alas, like eating a Chinese dinner,
it leaves us hungry for more.
Helen, the owner of a book store, finds a letter between the cushions
of the couch of the shop. She reads it, and it sounds intriguing,
because the writer goes to express how deeply he feels for the person
the letter has been sent to. Since it has no name, Helen assumes it has
been intended for her alone. She believes Johnny, the young assistant,
has sent it to her. The young man, who likes the older Helen, is only
too happy to tell her how he feels about her.
Basically, "The Love Letter" is a story about missed opportunities.
Helen who was in love with George, the local chief firefighter, married
someone else, but her marriage failed. George also is getting a
divorce. George confesses he had gone away to New York when he was
younger to get away from Helen and his life in town and he had also
sent her a postcard from New York, which Helen had kept, but had not
read the message inserted within the card. It's at this moment when
Helen comes to her senses when she realizes her affair with Johnny is
only a summer fling.
The film will be liked by the audience for which it was targeted. Kate
Capshaw, who produced the movie, is fine as Helen. Tom Everett Scott
plays Johnny. Blythe Danner, Geraldine McEwen, Julianne Nicholson, Tom
Selleck, Ellen DeGeneres, and the rest of the cast do good work also.
The film has an ironic twist at the end when the real recipient of this
letter is revealed.
One of the greatest and most wonderful surprises of 1999, "The Love Letter"
is a sparkling little film. Held back by a remarkably asinine
trailer--which
manages to combine the three or four dull, brief moments in the movie--the
picture is a warm-hearted, eminently watchable tale.
I had assiduously avoided the flick because of that very trailer, but ended
up having to watch "The Love Letter" on an 11 hour flight from Seoul to
Vancouver. I could easily have watched it three times--it's that much fun.
Kate Capshaw is bent and broken-down but somehow manages to be both
incredibly lovable and believable. Tom Everett Scott is absolutely
priceless
in his role as a confused young hunk. but any damage they
may have done to the overall film is negated by the superb performances of
Scott and Capshaw.
Sure, it's not worthy of an Oscar. But neither was "Shakespeare in Love",
and look what happened there.
Kate Capshaw stars in this charming story of a divorced book store owner who finds a love letter between the cushions of her couch. Who is it from? Therein lies the tale. Working for her in the book store are a handsome college student (Tom Everett Scott), a feisty store manager (Ellen DeGeneres), and a sweet young teenager (Juliane Nicholson). Waiting in the wings is Tom Selleck, the town fireman, who has held a torch for Capshaw all his life. These are all pleasant folks to spend a couple of hours with. The town is picturesque and the background score is romantic (by Luis Bacalov, composer of Il Postino). It's interesting to note that everyone does not end up with whom you expect. Supporting roles are ably, though too briefly, handled by Blythe Danner and Gloria Stewart (Titanic). Director, Peter Chan, who has been involved in the Hong Kong film world, has done surprisingly well with this material which is so American. I'm sure we'll be hearing from him again.
Aside from the fact that this movie was filmed mostly in Rockport MA, which
is a beautiful town where my mother once rented a small storefront and I
spent many a pleasant summer as a child, it is fun and cute little film.
I must admit that I had no desire to actually see this movie even though I
have a weakspot for romantic comedies (I don't know why). The trailers I
saw were not appealing, the cast did not look that interesting and I had no
idea what the plot would be about. In the end I found it to be an
interesting meditation on relationships and family. I thoroughly enjoyed
myself and must admit that I thought that this film was one of the most
overlooked gems of last year. I am disappointed that so few people seemed
to have enjoyed the very "human-ness" that this movie presented the viewer
with.
I have read many bad reviews of this film, and must admit a certain level of
shock at the cynicism that is prevalent in them. As a grad student I
consider myself to be quite cynical, but this was a beautiful little film
that deserves much better than it got.
| Page 1 of 8: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Newsgroup reviews |
| External reviews | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |