IMDb > Stuart Little (1999) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Stuart Little
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Reviews & Ratings for
Stuart Little More at IMDbPro »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 9 of 18: [Prev][4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [Next]
Index 177 reviews in total 

surprisingly awful

Author: Ed-90 from New England
27 January 2000

I guess I expected at least an average-ly interesting children's film. I was surprised at how abysmal it was--I couldn't tell if it was meant to be a "spoof", given the portrayal of the parents who were firmer with their cat than with their sullen son. It made no sense why that son found Stuart so undesirable as a "brother," as the mouse was quite cute. The parents were silly, impotent fools...was that part of the humor? The best part, perhaps, was Michael J. Fox's voice as Stuart...but be warned: my own children found the film as dully annoying as I did.

Was the above review useful to you?

Stuart Huge!

Author: Will Lau from Canada
26 January 2000

This is the first kids movie that I've seen since I was a kid so I didn't have big expectations for it but it was surprisingly good. I thought it was gonna be another Baby Genius type of movie but it had a good plot and some cool cats. A lot of things are far fetched but when you're a kid I guess ignorance is bliss so that can be overlooked. It was interesting to have Geena Davis in it. She's been out of the spotlight lately and this is not the way to get back in to it but she was pretty good in this. This was just a solid, entertaining movie, sure shows Van Damme a thing or two.

Was the above review useful to you?

My son and I

Author: ( from Redding, Ca.
21 January 2000

For what ever reason, I did go to this movie with my son that I would not have gone to on any other day. As the first scene started, I saw my son sitting there smiling with a soda in one hand and popcorn in the other. Watching him enjoy himself put me in the mood to relax and enjoy the movie. I did. Thats when the magic started.

Stuart Little was, for a lack of words, wonderful! My son and myself laughed and cried together. The special effects had to be the best ever to date. That little mouse was not an "effect" he was REAL!

The story about family was deep and heart felt. Never take your family for granted. Both my son and myself left hand in hand.

Was the above review useful to you?

Excellent movie

Author: kenokyds from Banning, Ca
21 January 2000

I would like to see more of these types of movies shown. It is always nice for a movie to be shown that children are able to view. As an adult, I found the movie clean, very entertaining and enjoyed it thoroughly.

Was the above review useful to you?

Another Great Family Movie

Author: bill_b4 from Red Springs, North Carolina, USA
15 January 2000

What a good year for family movies! The Iron Giant, Toy Story 2, and now Stuart Little. It's great to be able to safely take your children to the movie theater and see an entertaining, positive movie. I must admit, I was a little skeptical at first because I am not a Michael J. Fox fan (he is the voice for Stuart the mouse). But an interesting plot, solid acting, believable action sequences coupled with fantastic special effects make this a movie we will have to own when it comes out on video. But don't miss it on the big screen! Your kids will appreciate it!

Was the above review useful to you?

It's not "Stuart Little"

Author: roxy-13 from San Diego
13 January 2000


Dear Hollywood: A children's story is a children's story. A movie is a movie. Never, it seems, shall the twain meet.

Case in point: "Stuart Little," a simply delightful fantasy originally written by E. B. White, author of "Charlotte's Web." The film you have recently released tells a totally different story, one that is much more pedestrian and much less magical.

Fantasy, I have noticed, is not something Hollywood does well unless it is of the futuristic "Star Wars" type, and I submit that even the quality of that is in question. Fantasy and science fiction are not synonymous.

Fantasy requires that you trust your audience's willingness to suspend disbelief and go along with it. Trying to push fantasy around to make it sound plausible strips it of its charm and makes it into something else entirely.

What, to get specific, is the point in changing Stuart from a natural son to an orphan? Okay, women do not as a matter of course give birth to mice. But neither do they adopt rodents as sons.

The original Stuart is quite an enterprising little mouse who goes out and has his own adventures. Your Stuart is a poor-me substitute who just wants to be loved, and ends up inspiring more pity than admiration.

You have added characters not in the story---notably the three evil alley cats---who, I admit, are far and away the most interesting characters in the film, but who do not come from the story.

The Littles themselves, in fact, are so different as to be nearly unrecognizable. Your Mr. and Mrs. Little (Geena Davis, Hugh Laurie) are cloying and cutesy enough to set my teeth on edge. The originals are just plain old parents, and in fact are rather minor characters at that.

I will grant that the film has some wonderful animation---Stuart and the cats are particularly wonderful. And those alley cats (voiced by Nathan Lane, Chazz Palminteri, and Steve Zahn) have all the best lines.

The film is nice enough, as nice goes. But it isn't "Stuart Little." I would hate to know that this was any child's first encounter with Stuart.

How about calling it "There's a Mouse in My Bed?"

Sincerely, A Stuart Little fan

Was the above review useful to you?


Author: William D. Courter from Greensboro, NC
12 January 2000

Key Words: Cute / Funny / Sweet / But....

Hollywood thinks we would not go to see "G" movies (too "goodie, goodie") so they have to throw in some profanity, a bit of skin, or something to "earn" a PG rating. Too bad - for many parents want a "G" movie for their children with none of those things. This movie has a few unnecessary curse words and thus was granted its "PG" rating. Does Hollywood realize that as a "PG" hardly any schools in the USA will be permitted to show the movie to their classes????

CAUTION: The subject of adoption is mishandled! Your small adopted child will likely worry about two things after the movie:

(1) Your adopted parents only keep you until your "real" parents come along and want to take you away - and you must go even if you do not want to leave your adopted parents.

(2) Adoptions of children who are "different" (race, size, specie, etc.) causes problems and may not work out (as told by the adoption lady to the family) - although there is a happy ending.

The fantastic book by E.B.White does not deal with adoption - Stuart is just a regular member of his human family, regardless of the fact that he looks like (is ?) a mouse, which makes for a better fairy tale.

The CATS: The cats make for the best part of this movie. We cat lovers know how each cat is an individual with some sort of attitude or other. The best lines and the biggest laughs were reserved for the cats - as it should be!

SO: Take the kids. Enjoy the tale. And talk about what it all means with them after the movie.

Was the above review useful to you?

A wonderfully fuj film that pulls at emotions that everyone will understand.

Author: john.hinson from San Jose, CA
10 January 2000

Having children of my own, I get the excuse to see all of the films directed towards kids. Stuart Little is definitely one of the most enjoyable that has come along in several years. The movie is well casted and wonderfully portrayed. Anyone that sees it will come away with a great feeling inside.

Was the above review useful to you?

Good, with a couple of glitches

Author: Matt-014 from Wisconsin
8 January 2000

I enjoyed watching Stuart Little, but there were a couple of glitches. One, no one seemed to care or think something was up, when a mouse talked-??? But who really cares. The plot was good, and I was pleased with all the performances' especially Michael J. Fox as the voice of Stuart. This is a "cute" movie, and recommend to see with your family, especially if you have little kids, but you can go no matter who you are, so if you're in for a "cute" movie, go see this. 7/10

Was the above review useful to you?

Cute Film but caution taking small children

Author: radjones from Plano, Texas
8 January 2000

I was anxiously awaiting taking my 2 1/2 year old who has just discovered movies to this film. He did get a little bored in the middle, which I did expect. My biggest complaint -- this was a cute movie that I felt was geared toward young children that contained cursing! Call me a prude or locked in a bottle, but I felt that this was totally unnecessary to the plot. I understand that they were uttered by the "mob cat" but in a child's film it was not needed to make the cat a bad cat. I went into the movie assuming it was rated G and so was especially shocked. Afterwards I did see that it was PG but had it not been for the 5 curse words, it would have been G. Hollywood please take note--we do not need this filth in what seems to be a fairy tale. My child will hear these words soon enough without you sneaking it into his entertainment.

Was the above review useful to you?

Page 9 of 18: [Prev][4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [Next]

Add another review

Related Links

Plot summary Plot synopsis Ratings
Awards Newsgroup reviews External reviews
Parents Guide Official site Plot keywords
Main details Your user reviews Your vote history