Jurassic Park III (2001)

Based on 30 critic reviews provided by

75	Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert Not as awe-inspiring as the first film or as elaborate as the second, but in its own B-movie way, it's a nice little thrill machine.
63	Boston Globe Jay Carr What makes it worth sitting through is the chance it offers to catch up on the technical advances since the last installment.
63	New York Daily News Jack Mathews Anything, Steven, anything would be better than making us watch the same movie again.
63	Chicago Tribune Michael Wilmington Another of many recent Hollywood plotless wonders.
60	Los Angeles Times Kenneth Turan The sheer physical presence of these creatures is much more believable and convincing than what can be generously characterized as the film's plot.
50	Entertainment Weekly Owen Gleiberman Has no pretentions to be anything more than a goose-bumpy fantasy theme-park ride for kids, but it's such a routine ride.
50	San Francisco Chronicle Mick LaSalle This is a monster movie -- 92 minutes, lots of action, lots of green legs stomping, get in, get out.
40	Wall Street Journal Exemplifies Hollywood's standard practice of stomping a brilliant concept beyond recognition.
38	USA Today Mike Clark Even the special effects alone aren't worth the price of admission.
38	Philadelphia Inquirer Carrie Rickey Has to be the sorriest excuse for a reprise since "Highlander - The Final Dimension."
20	Rolling Stone Peter Travers Stinks worse than dino dung. Sure, the creatures look good.

Critic Reviews