| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Index | 24 reviews in total |
18 out of 20 people found the following review useful:
beautiful film, I watched it a second time in the theatre!, 19 February 2003
![]()
Author:
edward dardis (eduardo10075@hotmail.com) from Vancouver Canada
It's been a couple of years since I saw, but would like to see it again. I remember it being magical. Everything works well in this film: the acting carries the film without dialogue, the color of the film (sepia) gives it a surrealistic, fairy-tale quality. Great story, focusing on saving a family-operated bathouse from evil developers. Many memorable scenes, including fooling the blind father that the place is full of customers. Another example of a film that Hollywood/USA could never make.
13 out of 13 people found the following review useful:
A Great Film, 3 December 2000
![]()
Author:
phasmatodea (phasmatodea@hotmail.com) from toronto, ontario, canada
I enjoyed Tuvalu immensely. I found it to be a very touching and heart-warming look into the life of an ordinary man living in an extraordinary world. The story was great. It had elements of suspense, romance, tragedy and quirky humour. The actors also did an excellent job of bringing to life the odd and endearing characters. I also found that the film really succeeded in bringing across a mood with exquisitely bleak scenery and visuals which I found reminiscent of both "City of Lost Children" and "Brazil". Tuvalu is an incredible surrealistic journey through a world full of fantasy and wonder. I highly recommend it.
12 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
A wonderful experiment in the basics of film making., 29 September 2000
Author:
dzstroke015 from Canada
This is a film that filled me with warmth and appreciation for the
cinematic
artform. Using tinted black and white film and a suggestion of dialogue,
Veit Helmer was able to successfully tell a story in the way they were
told
within the first 30 years of cinema. It should renew anyone's faith in
this
medium who thought that Hollywood productions were all that were left to
call "entertainment".
Andre is the younger son of a blind man, left to run a delapidated bath
house in a fictional European city a few years in the future(?). He not
only
has to juggle the possible closing of the house by local authorities, keep
business going as usual, and keep his Father from finding out the true
plight of which they face, but also face his first true love, Eva. All
this
and an evil brother who wants to see the bath house torn down in way for a
new development and you have a formula that has been seen many times over.
However, several elements come into play that make this an outstanding
film.
One, the film is shot using tinted black and white film, giving the
decaying
sets a life of their own. Second, Veir opted out of having any "real"
dialogue and instead presented a combination of gestures, expressions and
universally known words to convey the words. This made way for the kind of
acting that was predominate in the first 30 years of film history, and if
he
had decided to illiminate the dialogue altogether it would have come out
the
exact same way. Not since the premiere films of Luc Besson, David Lynch or
Lars Von Trier can I stress the incredible treasure that has been created.
I hope that many more of you have the chance to see this
film.
9 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Brilliantly offbeat fairy tale around a swimming pool, 2 June 2000
Author:
Sergeiii from Fribourg, Switzerland
I have never been particularly fond of movies with taglines like "a poetic
adventure" or "a journey into the land of dreams" stamped on their front,
as
this kind of advertising is usually nothing more than a weak excuse for
the
absence of a coherent plot or some in-depth characterization, leaving you
in
the guess why the filmmakers didn't stick to the painting of aquarelles in
the first place. My expectations sank even lower when I understood that
there wasn't going to be any dialogue in "Tuvalu", at least not in the
proper sense of the term. So this couldn't be more than a soothing eye
candy
at best; hopefully free from the embarrassing "isn't our imagination a
wonderful thing"-moments or the "why can't we all be children
forever"-messages that tend to haunt this specific genre.
After a few moments into the film, I was entirely cured from that kind of
prejudice. "Tuvalu" surprisingly brings across the magic that is promised
on
the poster - and it works well for a variety of reasons. First of all,
despite the movie's innocent fairy tale character, it isn't coy about
adult
themes at all (like all good fairy tales, for that matter). We actually
even
have scenes of violence and nudity, but both are introduced in a very
playful and witty manner; in a style which I should consider perfectly
suitable for children.
Secondly, "Tuvalu" is hilariously funny, and at times, the humour is
pretty
far from being tongue-in-cheek... There is a lot of crude slapstick going
on, and sometimes the whole movie is close to the coarseness of a Punch
and
Judy show; but most of the time one just laughs at the sheer originality
and
inventiveness of the production. Furthermore, the sparse use of words
proves
to be a great means of comedy as well - the effect is somewhat comparable
to
the quasi-absence of comprehensible language in Jacques Tati's films, or,
for those who have seen it, in "Themroc".
Thirdly, there is always joy in watching talented and charismatic actors
under the direction of a talented director and screenwiter. You can tell
that everyone involved in the making was perfectly devoted to the project;
and this justified euphoria of the makers comes across in almost every
scene. They probably knew that they were doing something special, and this
is indeed what they have achieved. Additionally, Helmer's use of light and
colour is always original, but never distracting; every scene of this
movie
is simply beautiful to look at. Yes, I should say, imagination is a
wonderful thing and it is an utter shame that we can't be children
forever.
8 out of 8 people found the following review useful:
A genre bending film, 13 September 2000
![]()
Author:
Shiva-11 from Vancouver, BC
I attended the preview screening of "Tuvalu" for one simple reason - it was
the first film of the day and fit into my schedule. Having read a brief
synopsis of the film, I went in with mixed expectations - the review
snippets lauded the film, but could a two-hour black and white film largely
bereft of dialogue really be that entertaining? Please pass the crow...
Set in a dilapidated indoor swimming pool (the Central Baths in Sofia), the
film details the efforts of Anton, a clueless dreamer who yearns to sail the
world, and Martha, the button obsessed cashier, to maintain the illusion for
Anton's blind father that business is thriving. Working to sabotage their
efforts is Gregor - Anton's brother - an amoral developer who is determined
to raze the entire town and construct a sprawling condominium complex.
Gregor engineers an accident that seems certain to doom the business and in
the process steals away Eva, the beautiful woman of Anton's dreams. Will
Gregor's dastardly plan succeed?
It is difficult to categorize this film as it refuses to fit neatly within
the confines of any particular genre. Taken on its simplest merits it is a
slapstick comedy in the tradition of the Marx Brothers, Chaplin and the
Keystone Cops. On this level, alone it will satisfy most viewers. A closer
examination reveals a beautiful fairly tale with an innocent dreamer
fighting to save his world and loved ones from evil. Finally, there is the
none- too -subtle rail against the freight train of modernization,
particularly relevant in many areas of post-Communist where vast
construction projects are radically altering the cityscapes at the expense
of history. However, one need look no further that our own city to see this
-only recently have serious efforts been made to safeguard heritage
buildings in Vancouver - some fear it may already be too late.
Originally filmed in black and white, the stock was laboriously tinted to
give the interior shots take a Sepia tone and the exterior shots a muddy
turquoise- grey, providing further contrast for the story elements. The
visual experience is further enhanced by masterful cinematography, most
notably the underwater sequences, which take on a wondrous ethereal quality.
The sound engineers have also created a richly diverse auditory realm that
meshes uncannily with the onscreen action. Finally, the exaggerated
expressiveness of the actors, both emotive and physical keep the action
flowing seamlessly.
If you are in search of an unusual, intriguing film, look no
further.
7 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
A delightful black and white "silent" comedy acknowledging a debt to Chaplin and Buster Keaton, 19 September 2000
Author:
stebmarc from United States
The film is a beautifully photographed and outrageously funny example of visual story telling at its very best. Performances by all the leading characters are breathtakingly good and never for a moment overdone. I saw this film at the Taos Film Festival 2000 and it was by far the most memorable of the 10 or 12 I saw. I recommend it to anyone who is serious about the art and history of film making.
6 out of 7 people found the following review useful:
The most beautiful movie I've ever seen..., 9 June 2001
![]()
Author:
Dagmar Bittner (deirdrey2k@yahoo.de) from Erlangen, Germany
I love this movie! It's funny, it gives you material for hours of discussion and it makes you think and dream. my favourite scene is when Eva goes swimming with her pet-fish. Not only that her naked body looks very beautiful in the blue light - what impressed me most was the fact, that the fish believed to be free although it was imprisoned in a bigger vessel. A good film to reflect about your dreams and how to realize the ones that are no pipe dreams.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
A Fun and Bizarre Slapstick Fantasy!, 29 June 2008
![]()
Author:
NateManD from Bloomsburg PA
"Tuvalu" is a fantasy/ comedy that pays homage to everything from early German expressionism to Buster Keaton, David Lynch, Fellini and Jeanet and Cairo. In fact, in many ways it's similar to the films "Delicatessen" and "City of Lost Children". In "Tuvalu" a mother and son own a public pool in a creaky old building. Customers pay in buttons to use the pool. Yeah, buttons. An evil contractor, who looks like Jack Nance from "Eraserhead", longs to tear the place down and build a casino. The son falls for a beautiful girl only to have the contractor steal her away from him. He fights to keep the place open and win the heart of the girl. That's the basic plot, although it almost defies description. Even though it's a German film, there is hardly any dialog. The characters communicate by saying each other's names, or using crazy facial expressions, grunts or simple words like "yeah" or "no" which translate into every language. Filmed in sepia tones, It also reminded me of Canadian director Guy Maddin. "Tuvalu" is visually stunning, comical and highly surreal. It is also very cute with its romantic charm.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Drab colours, annoying characters... call me crazy but I liked it, 25 August 2006
![]()
Author:
rooprect from New York City
This is one of the weirder movies out there. But I can't say it's
original, because Jeunet & Caro pioneered this exact style 18 years
earlier in "Le Bunker de la dernière rafale" (1981). This is so much of
a rip-off that I wonder if the director was deliberately making an
homage to "Le Bunker", right down to the weird woman's chewing gum
collection (except in "Bunker" it was boogers. yeah, yuck).
Also, let's get something out of the way in case you don't know it
already: this is basically a black & white, silent film. So you need to
have a good attention span. It also has some of the ugliest actors I've
ever seen. So don't expect to instantly fall in love with any of the
characters, the way we do with Johnny Depp or the Hollywood prettyboys.
Instead we see a lot of wrinkly guys in need of a good orthodontist.
Welcome to European cinema.
If I haven't scared you off yet, then maybe there's hope. Now let's get
to the good part. Even though the plot is simple, it's a very
challenging & fun film to watch. Because there's very little dialogue
(mostly grunts, a few shouts and oh yes, the most hilarious line ever:
"TECHNOLOGY... SYSTEM... PROFIT!"), you're forced to work your brain to
understand even the simplest situations. In that respect, it reminds me
of those emergency cards you read on airplanes. You know, the goofy
cartoon icons without any words which are supposed to explain how to
save your life in the event of cabin depressurization. It's all so
retro.
Some of the gags are classic, and you may be reminded of some old
Charlie Chaplin material.
And even though I said it's black & white, there are some downright
magical colour tints which give it a dreamy feel. In one particular
blue-tinted shot, we see a graveyard of half-sunken ships. I couldn't
think of a better way of showing it--all the colours in the world
couldn't express it better. Imagine if "Metropolis" (1927) had been
re-done with seamless camera-work, cranes & dollies, and a very
convincing set. That should give you an indication of the visual style.
Really the only reason why I'm rating this a 7 instead of a 9 is
because it lost points for lack of originality (Jeunet/Caro rip-off).
But that shouldn't diminish its effectiveness as a work of art,
especially to those of you who haven't seen "Le Bunker de la dernière
rafale" or "Delicatessen". In any case, it's definitely worth the
rental fee.
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Chaplin's Internet Dreams, 23 January 2011
Author:
tedg (tedg@FilmsFolded.com) from Virginia Beach
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Going into this, you need some background, because the beginning does
not much help you enter this ambitious world.
When this was made, the expectation was that much streaming online
video (like Netflix) would be via websites with the suffix "dot
TeeVee." That domain (the word itself is significant) was assigned to a
tiny Polynesian island nation, who subsequently sold rights to internet
speculators. The irony of watching a film, itself a pretense, in such a
pretend domain is something that would have given me a chuckle. As
there are a number of people like me, there is an audience for
extensions of this comic notion.
The film features a wasteland of rubble, in the midst of which is an
ornate old-fashioned moviehouse. Every narrative detail is built around
various elements of the film experience, and the fantasies that it both
evokes and rides on. You would not know that from the film itself
however, and I suppose that is intended.
Once entering the building, having passed the box office (you can pay
with a button), the immersive experience is a swimming pool. The
success of this is fabricated for the senile owner, and threatened by
"the authorities." It is powered by a complex steam device, clearly
labeled "Imperim," incidentally the name (at the time) of a large movie
file sharing website.
Built on this are many overlapping references to film-fantasy borders,
using overt film references, mostly from the era of "pure" cinema. One
narrative thread has to do with a romance, woven into another with the
notion of escape via sea. The "engine" of the cinema is literally moved
to the boat of this romantic escape while the moviehouse collapses. It
is all something of a muddle, but a muddle in such respectful and
complex notions of film, you end up glowing at the sharing of the
thing.
If you like Guy Maddin, you will like this. Some scenes simply charm
your soul. The one most often cited is our love interest swimming nude
underwater with her beloved pet goldfish in a bowl.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
| Page 1 of 3: | [1] [2] [3] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |