(1993 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Sheer erotica
christopher-underwood10 January 2007
Crass, overblown, repetitive, nonsensical, turgid and pretentious…….and yet! This 80 minute early Michael Ninn venture would run less than a quarter that length if all the repeat shots were removed and the action ran at the correct speed and initially this is all a bit irritating. The pseudo intellectual dialogue is thankfully mostly distorted to the point of being indecipherable….and yet! This is like reading a dirty book with only dirty bits in and all seems indigestible, too rich, and yet gradually this one wins you over. Persuaded by the super shots repeated so they can be enjoyed again and slowed to become sexy and fun without becoming rushed and nasty, this crazy jumped up so called erotica, ends up being just that . Sheer erotica. All the familiar traits of Ninn's later work are here already. Men in suits and dark glasses waiting their turn for action, angled shots of furniture and architecture, flickering TV screens….and the girls. Ninn is happy to mix big breasted with small breasted and real with fake, just as long as the performance given is suitably animated.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Food for Thought and Libido
Nodriesrespect1 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Michael Ninn's first masterpiece, following interesting experiments like TWO SISTERS and PRINCIPLES OF LUST, proves the director's talent for artful assimilation, blending a visual style heavily influenced by Andrew Blake with narrative complexity and blistering sexual heat. Deliberately vague but compelling plot can be interpreted in a myriad of ways, none of them very uplifting as there's no escaping the film's all-embracing sense of loss and regret. It's unsurprising to learn that Ninn wrote this downbeat script during a bout of depression in the wake of a messy divorce. This is the movie that put Ninn on the adult industry map, stunningly shot and seamlessly edited to a pounding beat, yet not restricted to pure eye candy surface gloss in a way that much of his later work is.

This tells the tale of powerful though insecure publishing editor Blade (funny man Jonathan Morgan, effectively cast against type) who sends off a mysterious Madame (Ona Zee at her most glacially imperious) in search of the elusive writer (a hauntingly vulnerable Steve Drake) of a tome entitled "Black Orchid". In this book, the writer bared (and sold ?) his soul along with the sacred intimacy of a life shared with his one true love (Veronica Hart), thereby soothing the weary hearts of all those who have loved and lost and have picked up the novel in search of solace. The film continually drifts off into flights of fancy, fantasies inspired by the chapters of the book, yet never loses focus. Morgan, harboring painful memories of his own, commissions Drake to write another book, just for him, recapturing romance without fear of getting hurt, symbolically making the author his hired lover, an artist whoring his vision by turning his secrets of love into prose and putting a price on them. Soaring into the stratosphere at this point, the film becomes a paean to the mysteries of womankind, celebrating their life-affirming sensuality yet – from a male viewpoint – uncomprehending before the complexities of their "otherness".

Considering how emotionally closed off these characters are, Drake's final line comes as no surprise : "The end is always the same. Narcissus drowning in his own image." Loving one's self makes a poor substitute for the love bestowed upon another human being, whatever the risks. Wallowing in self pity as result of a break-up can never turn into the liberating experience we may want it to be. No man is an island, after all. Men and women might never be able to figure each other out but that's just part of the attraction between them to begin with. Perhaps we shouldn't keep on trying to get to the bottom of each other's closely guarded mysteries but accept them as aspects of the personality of those we find ourselves falling in love with. Maybe that is the first step on the road to understanding.

The film's overwhelming sense of sadness even extends to its melancholy, wistful sex scenes, best exemplified by the shower sequence involving then real life husband and wife team Sunset and Zack Thomas making love with such exquisite tenderness to bring tears to your eyes even as it turns you on. Ninn's open invitation for viewers to explore their own fears of abandonment eventually alienated a lot of adult critics come awards time, resulting in a snubbing as unexpected as it was undeserved from prize-giving organizations.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a masterpiece
turtsi12324 March 2002
Probably the one and only hard core-porn movie that makes me want to use fast forward during the sex scenes so that I can watch the rest of the film and enjoy of its unusually beautiful music and pictures.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed