| Page 1 of 14: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 137 reviews in total |
35 out of 38 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful, 8 May 2005
![]()
Author:
Mary Kae from United States
A slow, rich movie. Though it lags in places, the three lead
performances are indelibly written in my memory. And the great jazz
soundtrack and warm colors made this movie go down like a glass of
bourbon.
Embodying the archetypal difficult genius, Emmet Ray is an almost
cartoonishly dislikable guy. But Sean Penn keeps him just this side of
sympathetic; we loathe his actions, we curse his self-destructiveness,
and yet we're compelled to keep watching in the increasingly futile
hope he'll turn himself around. His last scenes are heartrending.
As Hattie, Samantha Morton strikes a perfect, almost Chaplinesque,
balance of comedy and tragedy. The line separating the two is
razor-thin; she dances gracefully upon it. I could say more, but
perhaps appropriately, it's difficult to find words that capture the
beauty of her silent performance. Half the joy is in watching her
reactions naturally unfold anyway.
Like Penn, Uma Thurman portrays a pretty unlikeable character. Her
Blanche is overly intellectual, questions incessantly and is in some
ways just as emotionally alienated as Emmett. Though her character is
grating at first (particularly in contrast to Morton), Thurman does not
shrink from the less flattering aspects of her character. It's a brave
performance in a thankless role.
Woody Allen has constructed a thoughtful meditation on the nature of
artistry. Not on celebrity -- we all know how that film turned out --
but on the rights and responsibilities of the true artist. Emmett,
Hattie and Blanche represent the axis of artists, fans and critics
respectively. As their relationships play out -- naturally, inexorably
and poignantly -- the viewer gets a rare treat: a film that plucks at
the mind and at the heart as gracefully as Emmett picking his guitar
strings.
39 out of 46 people found the following review useful:
The type of film Woody Allen does very well, 2 October 2000
![]()
Author:
Robert Reynolds (minniemato@hotmail.com) from Tucson AZ
In my opinion, there is more than one type of Woody Allen film. There is the antic lunacy of films like Bananas and Sleeper, the serio-comic "serious" film with "meaning", like Annie Hall, Husbands and Wives and Deconstructing Harry and then there are what I think are Woody Allen's "love notes", if you'll bear with the expression, films like The Purple Rose of Cairo, Bullets Over Broadway and Sweet and Lowdown, films as a general rule that are period pieces (generally the '30's or thereabouts) that are basically mash notes from Allen to something Allen particularly cares about, such as jazz in Sweet and Lowdown (specifically jazz guitar and Django Reinhardt). The score is great, which is typical for a Woody Allen film. Allen does these little films vey well and they are almost always worth watching. Sean Penn plays a self-centered, egotistical creep with talent. I will leave any further interpretations regarding the preceding statement to the Gentle Reader. Why he was nominated for an Oscar escapes me. Samantha Morton, on the other hand, gives a sweet, if almost one-note, performance, which basically sums up the movie: worth the time and effort to watch, but a one-note film. If you like this side of Woody (and I do), this is worth seeing.
30 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
Hats Off To 'Hattie!', 24 October 2005
![]()
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 from United States
This is a strange movie, but one made a little bit special to me
because of one memorable character: "Hattie," played by Samantha
Morton. What a wonderful, endearing character! The sweet look on her
face alone makes this movie worth keeping.
Another huge positive for this film is the cinematography. This is
beautifully shot with great colors which look all the better on DVD.
As mentioned by other reviewers, Sean Penn also does an excellent job
in the lead. The shocker for me was how good a comedic touch he
exhibits. Putting his general persona or politics aside, this man
deserves kudos as an actor.
There is a third very different and interesting character in this
movie: "Blanche," played by Uma Thurman, who portrays an amoral woman
in the last part of the film. She, too, is fascinating.
So....three interesting characters, great photography AND terrific
music - jazz guitar is a central part of this story - all make for a
fun hour-and-a-half of entertainment.
29 out of 35 people found the following review useful:
The first essential Woody Allen film in a long time., 31 May 2004
![]()
Author:
Ben_Cheshire from Oz
Sean Penn plays Emmett Ray, a little-known jazz guitarist, an
eccentric, egocentric genius self-proclaimed as the "greatest guitar
player in the country" or the "second greatest guitar player in the
world" - because of that gypsy from France, the bane of his life,
Django Reinhardt. The story of Sweet and Lowdown is the story of Emmett
and the girl he first describes as "the little one with the silly hat,"
who is also, incidentally, called Hattie. There is something so special
and memorable about the chemistry between Hattie and Emmett. Hattie is
perfect for Emmett, because she's mute, and therefore he can sound off
all day about how great he is, and she's the one person who won't
contradict him.
Woody has the knack of making highly watchable movies - and popping
them out one a year. There is a continuity across them all, yet they
all seem somewhat unique. Sweet and Lowdown stands heads and shoulders
above every other film Woody has made since Husbands and Wives. With
Sweet and Lowdown, Woody reminds us why we loved him in the first place
- yet i'm not sure i can think of another Woody film that's as genuine,
beautiful and moving, yet eccentric and funny at the same time. Annie
Hall was probably as touching, but with Woody is no actor next to Penn,
which i think makes an incredible difference! Penn brings to life a
character so eccentric and unbelievable, yet we never doubt him, we
never feel he's not a total human being.
Penn's performance is counterbalanced by another equally moving
performance by Samantha Morton as Hattie. Often you'll find yourself
watching a two-shot with the both of them on screen, and you won't be
able to decide which character you're more curious to watch. More often
than not, you'll watch Samantha Morton, to see what Hattie is thinking
and feeling. An extraordinary job by an extraordinarily talented
actress you may have seen as the mother in In America or the pre-cog
Agatha in Minority report.
The one fault in the film is Uma Thurman - she is badly miscast and
clearly only suited to intentionally hammy fodder like Kill Bill. Her
character, Blanche, is great ("Okay, so i slept with him, but i was
just researching a book!"), which makes it more the shame that Thurman
speaks her line like she thinks this is a cartoon or a Tarantino movie.
The audience will only accept the eccentricity of this style if the
performances are genuine: she gets an F. She pops the bubble of this
movie. When she appears, we suddenly realise its only a movie, and the
spell is broken. Nevertheless, she's only in a relatively small portion
of the film, and she can't bring down the rest of it.
Sweet and Lowdown has the feeling of telling you a tale, and it spins
some great fun yarns about little-known jazz guitarist Emmett Ray. Penn
and Morton bring to life an incredible couple of characters - two of
Woody's best creations. Well designed with nice period costumes and
well directed, especially the magestic final crane shot (a reference to
La Strada i believe). The story is beautifully punctuated with
scintillating jazz music by Dick Hyman and others.
"Come listen," Emmett tells someone at one point, "you'll love this,
i'm great."
19 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Great, small movie form the genius., 15 April 2000
![]()
Author:
Trufó from Cologne
Woody Allen has such control over the story telling tools of cinema that he can do whatever he wants. Mixing "documentary" comments about what is happening with the characters, and straightforward and yet superbly filmed feature sequences, Allen shows once again why he is one of the greatest film directors of our time. Good plot, great performances, skillfully constructed characters, excellent camera work... can you ask for more?
19 out of 22 people found the following review useful:
A virtuoso performance by the greatest actor of our time., 4 August 2004
![]()
Author:
jaspoet from Brooklyn, New york
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Sweet and Lowdown is the story of a fictional jazz guitarist who is self admittedly the second best in the world(next to that gypsy in France) but there is one thing that is clear while watching this movie, sean penn is second to no one. He is simply the greatest actor of our time and he once again proves it here. As emmett Ray, sean penn invests his very soul and embodies the role of a vain, talented, yet oblivious and cold hearted man who is actually filled with self doubt and remorse. The character is as crude a low life thief and pimp as he is a excellent musician. He is the zany, pathetic artist with a heart of stone. That penn can make you feel for him is no easy task. Penn also did an exceptional job mastering the appearance of playing the guitar for the role. Woody Allen has crafted a gem of a film filled with poignancy and humor. Samantha Morton is incredible as Hattie the mute girl who clearly worships everything about Ray, though Ray doesn't have the ability to notice a good thing when it's standing in front of his self absorbed face. That Ray is both a genius and a fool is clear and it's the emotional core of the film. He's just as at home shooting rats at the train tracks as he is performing drunk for his adoring audience. At the end of the movie there is a series of scenes in which the emotional weight of Rays mistakes seem to finally be understood by him. In one he meets Hattie again on the same boardwalk where they originally met, though she is now happily married and a mother. The false bravado of Rays personality seems to crack momentarily only to be swallowed again by his deluded machismo. The second even more heart wrenching is the final scene at the railroad with Gretchen Mol. Penn in an ill fated attempt to show off his skills for her seems to have all of his regrets, conceits and pain hit him at once. Watching Penn slowly remove the mask of Rays lonely broken heart is a gift, in an acting class of it's own. He is truly the master of American acting. Who won best actor in 2000? Russell Crowe in gladiator? And we wonder why penn doesn't believe in acting awards.
16 out of 17 people found the following review useful:
For The Love Of Django, 16 January 2006
![]()
Author:
jldmp1 (jldmp1@aol.com) from United States
When we try to understand genius, or love, or "why?", we run into the
same problem that the ancients encountered:
"I went to the poets
I took them some of the most elaborate passages
in their own writings, and asked what was the meaning of them
thinking that they would teach me something. I must say that there is
hardly a person present who would not have talked better about their
poetry than they did themselves. That showed me in an instant that not
by wisdom do poets write poetry, but by a sort of genius and
inspiration; they are like diviners or soothsayers who also say many
fine things, but do not understand the meaning of them." Socrates,
The Apology
So here we have Woody telling a story about a storyteller, who talks
and struts endlessly (Penn has a ball with this), but can only say
anything through music, and he can't explain a bit of it. Much like
Woody, who prattles on about every neurosis, but speaks volumes through
his control of the medium. It's just something he's born to do.
And this is the only way to understand Django -- with only two working
fingers on his fretting hand (accidental disfigurement), he reinvented
the whole medium of guitar. The new shape of his hand forced him into
holding octaves - which can be done on guitar with two adjacent
fingers, unlike on the piano - and changing the way leads and comping -
here, self-accompaniment - were played. His art was the necessary step
before Les Paul, and thence to Wes Montgomery, and so on to you and me.
Here is devotion without hagiography, because all of this is wrapped
into "one of those Emmett Ray stories", where you can 'never be sure'
of what is truth, confabulation, or exaggeration.
Brilliance. Bravo, to all.
16 out of 18 people found the following review useful:
Very watchable, very charming, 29 May 2003
![]()
Author:
ian_harris from London, England
This is a very enjoyable movie. It has many touches in it that are classic
Woody Allen, so it should appeal to his many fans. It is also so strong on
the jazz material that it should appeal to jazz afficianados even if they
are not Woody Allen fans.
The biographical / documentary styles keep this movie away from Woody's
worst excesses (I am a fan, but not a blinkered one)and provide momentum.
There are one or two scenes that migrate towards farce, such as the hold-up
scene(s) and the "moon seat".
This film is well worth seeing.
16 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Proof that Sean Penn can really act, 9 September 2004
Author:
drosse67 from Virginia
The two movies that come to mind when I think about Sean Penn and his acting ability are not Mystic River and Fast Times at Ridgemont High. They are Carlito's Way and Sweet & Lowdown. In both of these movies, he immerses himself in the characters, while in most of his other movies, including the art house hits like 21 Grams and Hurly Burly, he plays more or less the same type of person. Sweet and Lowdown has Penn playing a self-absorbed classical guitarist who obsesses over a world-renowned guitarist much in the way Woody Allen obsesses over things in his other movies. Woody himself shows up as a commentator (this, like Zelig, is presented in mock documentary fashion). It is amusing, if slight (and a sign of things to come in 2000-2002, with Small Time Crooks, Curse of the Jade Scorpion and Hollywood Ending). Samantha Morton won a justified Oscar nomination, but Uma Thurman and Gretchen Mol are wasted (Uma got second billing over Sean Penn, and is hardly in the movie!) Not a Woody Allen masterpiece, but fans could do worse.
12 out of 16 people found the following review useful:
Wonderful Movie about Love, Genius and Great Jazz Guitar Playing, 5 August 2007
![]()
Author:
zippyflynn2 from Los Angeles, United States
As Woody Allen said of Sean Penn after working with him on this film
"(Sean's) a tremendous actor". And he displays his tremendous talent in
playing the role of Emmett Ray, jazz guitarist, a genius at his craft,
rather a disastrous dope in all other aspects of his life.
Then there's Samantha Morton who is brilliant in her portrayal of
sweet, adorable Hattie, a cute mute young woman whose simple needs and
wants, along with her lack of narcissism and inability to spew out mind
numbing volumes of bulls+t banter obscure her deep strength and savvy
intelligence. Those that value pure, sweet, unassuming kindness will
find her irresistibly lovable.
Emmett only really knows one thing, how to play guitar like no one else
in the world, with the exception of the one person he idolizes to the
point of hysteria: Django Reinhardt. He's obliviously inept at just
about everything else in his life, especially his feelings, to the
point where he doesn't know real, rare, wonderful love when it's right
next to him. Sean is able to make Emmett so very likable, even in his
worst of behavior. He excels at what he does best, bringing real human
depth and qualities to his craft that exceptionally few actors are or
have been capable of doing.
This film is much like the character of Hattie, deceptive in its
initial appearance and of a substantially better quality than you may
first think. It seems like a light, cute little story largely due to
its entertaining presentation and lack of dramatic pretense but there
is significant texture and reality to this work of art. Emmett is
perhaps the greatest guitar player in America and has so many of the
essential ingredients for huge success: drive, ambition, presentation,
wardrobe, personality, yet he tends to sabotage himself frequently and
never gets the lucky break needed to put him at the top. True he could
probably do rather well if he didn't p+ss away such volumes of cash but
he never gets the type of success that the best supposedly deserve and
is so wrought with money it won't disappear in the most extravagant
lifestyles.
Emmett also makes the tragically universal mistake of believing
bullsh+t, both his and society's. He thinks the money and possessions
and trophy girlfriends are what happiness are all about. His one saving
grace is his love and respect for his craft but can this alone keep him
from making a disaster of his life? He discovers all too painfully that
the beautiful woman with the sophisticated, witty repartee, whom all
the other men drool over, has an extremely high price tag of
impenetrable, cold blooded narcissism. And though Emmett acts for the
most part like a shallow dope, trying to hide and deny that besides
being a genius he is a painfully sensitive man in desperate need of
sweet, nurturing love, he still makes way too many foolhardy decisions.
He is blind to the fact that the women who use sweetness merely as a
tool of manipulation are the last thing he, or anyone else with a shred
of decency, need or deserve.
This is a great film and story and you can also enjoy a very pretty
picture of life in the 1940's while you watch it.
Apparently there was an obscure jazz guitarist named Emmett Ray but
even if there wasn't, this is not really a fictionalized account.
Certainly not in the sense of capturing the essence of character, love
and genius. As he has done so marvelously before and since, Woody Allen
masterfully captures an immensely watchable slice of life that most of
us will only have an opportunity to witness with this fine offering.
For the film itself as well as the two stellar leads this is will go
into my relatively short list of wonderful, favorite films.
| Page 1 of 14: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Official site |
| Plot keywords | Main details | Your user reviews |
| Your vote history |