Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (TV 1986)One dissenting juror in a murder trial tries to influence the verdict with his personal prejudices and biases Director:Basu Chatterjee |
|
| 0Share... |
Ek Ruka Hua Faisla (TV 1986)One dissenting juror in a murder trial tries to influence the verdict with his personal prejudices and biases Director:Basu Chatterjee |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview: | |||
|
|
Deepak Kejriwal | ... |
Juror #1
|
|
|
Amitabh Srivastava | ... |
Juror #2
|
|
|
Pankaj Kapur | ... |
Juror #3
|
|
|
S.M. Zaheer | ... |
Juror #4
|
|
|
Subhash Udghate | ... |
Juror #5
|
|
|
Hemant Mishra | ... |
Juror #6
|
|
|
M.K. Raina | ... |
Juror #7
|
|
|
K.K. Raina | ... |
Juror #8
|
| Annu Kapoor | ... |
Juror #9
|
|
|
|
Subbiraj | ... |
Juror #10
|
|
|
Shailendra Goel | ... |
Juror #11
|
|
|
Aziz Qureshi | ... |
Juror #12
|
|
|
C.D. Sindhu | ... |
Gatekeeper
|
Twelve male members of a jury gather together in an enclosed room to deliberate their decision on a charge of murder against a young man who has been accused of killing his elderly father. All of the jury, save for one, are convinced of this young man's guilt, and they would like to convince their colleague also to come to the same unanimous decision. But will they be able to convince him to change his verdict? Written by rAjOo (gunwanti@hotmail.com)
Twelve jurors - common people with their usual daily problems, emotional swings and their regular habit to stick to what is obvious - are selected to judge a case where very strong evidences are available against the accused. Everything was transparent and vividly clear. The case was supposed to end with common opinion against the accused within no time. But one person was against this common judgment and this is the point where story builds up. This one person make other eleven to change their decision. It is Hindi adoption of 'Twelve Angry Men (1957)' (as far as I feel.)and is equally mastered. It is acclimatized for Indian viewers. Performance of actors touches the pinnacle and it is a recommendable movie.