5.3/10
1,635
53 user 6 critic

Brave New World (1998)

In a futuristic totalitarian utopian society, babies are created through genetic engineering, everyone has a predestined place in society and their minds are conditioned to follow the rules. A tragic outsider jeopardizes the status quo.

Writers:

(book), (teleplay) | 1 more credit »
Reviews
Popularity
3,630 ( 42)
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Brave New World (TV Movie 1980)
Drama | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.8/10 X  

A man who grew up in a primitive society educating himself by reading Shakespeare is allowed to join the futuristic society where his parents are from. However, he can not adapt to their repressive ways.

Director: Burt Brinckerhoff
Stars: Julie Cobb, Bud Cort, Keir Dullea
Brave New World (TV Movie 2011)
Comedy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  
Director: Michael Patrick Jann
Stars: Anna Popplewell, Robby Benson, Tyler Blackburn
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.3/10 X  

These machines will completely transform the way we live. Be whisked into the future in a driverless car, then watch as motorized artificial limbs transform paraplegics into pedestrians--and average humans into bionic miracles.

Stars: Stephen Hawking, Kathy Sykes, David Attenborough
Sleep Dealer (2008)
Drama | Romance | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.9/10 X  

The near future. Like tomorrow. In a world marked by closed borders, corporate warriors, and a global computer network, three strangers risk their lives to connect, break through the barriers of technology, and unseal their fates.

Director: Alex Rivera
Stars: Leonor Varela, Jacob Vargas, Luis Fernando Peña
Sci-Fi

A rogue in a corrupt society recruits a savage to help rise against the system.

Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  

A young man visited by a mysterious free-thinker is forced to decide whether or not to speak about about his faith under government pressure as the world turns on religion.

Director: Garrett Thomas
Stars: Davis Dean, Garrett Thomas, Terra Adams
Short | Action | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  

Short fan film about a special agent sent through time by the leaders of the drug-fueled utopia seen in Brave New World to present day USA to find something. He runs into one of the locals and gunfight ensues.

Director: Nathan Hyde
Stars: Alex Hyde, Payton McDonald, Philo
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
John Cooper
...
Lenina Crowne
...
Linda
Patrick J. Dancy ...
Henry Foster
Steven Flynn ...
James
...
Fanny (as Wendy Benson)
...
Beta Clerk
...
Ingram
...
...
Delta Coffee Server
...
Gabriel
Nicholas Belgrave ...
Alpha Student Boy #1 (as Nick Belgrave)
...
Alpha Student Girl #1
Edit

Storyline

In a futuristic totalitarian utopian society, babies are created through genetic engineering, everyone has a predestined place in society and their minds are conditioned to follow the rules. A tragic outsider jeopardizes the status quo.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama | Sci-Fi

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

19 April 1998 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Admirável Mundo Novo  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The book, "Brave New World" that this movie's based on, has been banned in many places, including Ireland in 1932. It was Huxley's 5th novel. It was also based on many people, including Freud and Jung, and each character is based off of someone as well. Also, the book has many references to Shakespeare, and some of his banned works. See more »

Connections

Version of Brave New World (1980) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Brave new adaptation
4 July 2004 | by (Yorkshire, England) – See all my reviews

Okay, I realize that I'm probably going to get labeled as either a moron or a heretic for this, but I'm not going to let that put me off!

Y'see, the fact is I LOVED this version of Huxley's classic!!!

The main reason for contempt aimed at this film appears to concern the matter of deviation from the original text.

Firstly, it is almost always necessary when adapting literary material, and this is the case here. Secondly, the alterations are not that severe. The only real changes pertain to character (oh, and the admittedly fluffy pink ending which appears to have been pinned on as an afterthought, I'll give you that one): Marx and Lenina are fleshed out, in that they develop the ability to learn and evolve, which in the book is impossible. Helmholtz is removed as his purpose in the book is fulfilled here by Marx in the aforementioned capacity. John is rendered here more mentally stable and exhibits none of the religious fervor for guilt and self flagellation.

Right, so why were these changes necessary?

In the study version of the text, the notes state "Thus however tempting it may be to base a reading of brave new world on a sympathetic identification with the characters, it would be a distortion of the novel to do so." It also postulates that the "characters are static, incapable of learning, changing and developing in the way real people do".

Now, these things may well be fine in a book, but in a film the medium requires precisely the kind of 'sympathetic identification' missing from the text if it is to be enjoyed by any kind of audience outside of, perhaps, the art-house crowd. Moreover, characters in films NEED to evolve in a way that is not perhaps required in a literary equivalent. It is simply a matter of adapting format to work successfully.

As for John, and again with reference to the study text, Huxley himself states "...the most serious defect in the story, which is this, the savage is offered only two alternatives, an insane life in Utopia...(or that) his native Penetente-ism reasserts its authority and he ends in maniacal self torture and suicide." He goes on to assert "if I were to rewrite the book, I would offer the savage a third alternative. Between the utopian and the primitive horns of his dilemma would lie the possibility of sanity"

The alterations to John's character not only serve the aforementioned necessities when converting the story to celluloid, but address Huxley's own misgivings about the direction the story arc took.

Basically, the changes are justified.

As to the socio economic and eugenic details in Huxleys work - the things that made it so important, well 95% of them are in there. Some are slightly updated, but essentially they are identical. The only missing ingredients that I spotted were the Bokanovskyfication of human embryo's, and the erotic play amongst children.

The former perhaps should have been utilized, but the latter, well, they'd have NEVER gotten away with that.

All in all, and given the obvious budgetary restraints clearly present, I believe this to be a faithfully spirited, valid interpretation of a book that was always going to be incredibly difficult to film.


26 of 34 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?