MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 175,646 this week

Shot in the Dark (1933)

 -  Mystery  -  November 1933 (UK)
5.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.8/10 from 28 users  
Reviews: 1 user | 1 critic

The relatives of a millionaire--the victim of a mysterious murder--get together at his house to search for his will, which he recorded on a record. However, one of them is actually the ... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(novel), (adaptation), 2 more credits »
0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

Live Chat with Keanu Reeves

We conducted a Live Chat with Keanu about his upcoming film John Wick.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 1166 titles
created 13 Aug 2011
 
a list of 1107 titles
created 02 Feb 2012
 
list image
a list of 146 titles
created 08 Apr 2012
 
list image
a list of 2192 titles
created 23 Apr 2013
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Shot in the Dark (1933)

Shot in the Dark (1933) on IMDb 5.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Shot in the Dark.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
O.B. Clarence ...
Rev. John Makehan
...
Norman Paull
...
Vivien Waugh
Davy Burnaby ...
Col. Michael Browne (as Dave Burnaby)
A. Bromley Davenport ...
Peter Browne
Russell Thorndike ...
Dr. Stuart
Hugh E. Wright ...
George Yarrow
Henrietta Watson ...
Angela Browne
Margaret Yarde ...
Kate Browne
Dorothy Boyd ...
Alaris Browne
Edit

Storyline

The relatives of a millionaire--the victim of a mysterious murder--get together at his house to search for his will, which he recorded on a record. However, one of them is actually the person who killed him, and will let nothing--or no one--stand in the way of finding that record. Written by frankfob2@yahoo.com

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Mystery

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

November 1933 (UK)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

(RCA Photophone)

Aspect Ratio:

1.37 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

For lovers of the truly awful
6 January 2002 | by (London, England) – See all my reviews

Possible spoiler ahead

This hilarious quota quickie is a prime contender for the British Golden Turkey award. Taken straight it's pretty typical of it's time, a well photographed thriller in which the relatives of a murdered millionaire, (smarmy guy, drippy young hero and heroine, snooty dowager, various pompous and/or inscrutable types) gather at his creepy house and search for his will (recorded on a record). But one of them is guilty of the murder and will stop at nothing to gain the inheritance. (flash of lightening... cackle cackle.) Eventually the mystery is solved by an outsider, in this case a local vicar (and amateur detective).

That's the plot more or less and while everyone (well... most everyone) tries, it's when things go wrong that this movie comes uniquely to life.

For example in the midst of a heated row over the whereabouts of the record, Reverend John Malcolm makes his first appearance, strolling in from the garden in search of a lost golf ball. O.B. Clarence plays this character with such dithering languidity it's hard to believe he could find his way to the bathroom let alone solve the mystery. But he's more resourceful (or downright nosey) than he seems and in an series of increasingly amusing face-offs reveals that everyone there had a motive and opportunity to knock the old boy off.

All the performances are bad, whether it's the ever so English heroine, the smarmy fellow (who gives roughly the same performance in other quickies of this period) or the typically flailing fist fights that occur towards the end of the movie.

But by far the most ridiculous performance comes from A. Bromley Davenport as the guarded Peter Browne. The scene in which the Reverend questions Browne and breaks down his resistance is a classic of bad acting, whether shrieking "What the hell are you trying to do to me" in an incredible falsetto, or, with an evil smile, confessing his secret addiction to "drrrugs".

While nothing else quite compares to this moment, the various absurd plot twists mean it's never dull. Also it's interesting to see a 23 year old Jack Hawkins a long way removed from the type of character he's remembered for.

Highly recommended.


7 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Shot in the Dark (1933) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?