A lad jousting with his tutor is kidnaped and carried to the Bastille where his head is locked in an iron mask. Jump ten years: Musketeers return from war in Morocco to find Paris starving ... See full summary »
King Louis XIII of France is thrilled to have born to him a son - an heir to the throne. But when the queen delivers a twin, Cardinal Richelieu sees the second son as a potential for ... See full summary »
Marguerite De La Motte,
The Pickering Commission concluded that a lone gunman killed the US President in 1960, in Philadelphia, but 19 years later a dying man confesses to be one of the real hit-men who killed President Kegan, sparking an investigation.
King Louis XIV has without his knowledge a twin brother, Philippe, but when he is told, he immediately locks up his brother in the Bastille. The king wants to increase his popularity and ... See full summary »
It's 1649: Mazarin hires the impoverished D'Artagnan to find the other musketeers: Cromwell has overthrown the English king, so Mazarin fears revolt, particularly from the popular Beaufort.... See full summary »
A lad jousting with his tutor is kidnaped and carried to the Bastille where his head is locked in an iron mask. Jump ten years: Musketeers return from war in Morocco to find Paris starving while Louis XIV and his retinue idle at Duke Fouquet's estate. Louis is enamored with his host's virginal daughter, Valliere, herself in love with Athos. The queen mother calls the Jesuit Aramis to her deathbed to confess that Louis has a twin, "a second born, he was first conceived, the oldest and true heir," the man in the iron mask. Aramis secures his release and hides him while Porthos and Athos school him for his destiny. D'Artagnan remains loyal to Louis: love, schemes and politics entwine. Written by
Of the four Man in the Iron Mask adaptations seen, this one is by far and large the worst. Edward Albert brings dignity and cool energy to Athos and Timothy Bottoms is adequately menacing as Fouquet, but when it comes to redeeming merits that's where this adaptation ends. Apart from Albert and Bottoms, the actors look really uninterested in their roles with Nick Richert being the least convincing and cruel Louis you'd find in any adaptation of the classic story. The film does look cheap with a real lack of authenticity in sound and detail and the production has a lot of dull colours and lighting. Adding to the tedium are a screenplay that lacks snap and pace(the underwritten dialogue and stiff line delivery not helping), action that is undercooked(in utilisation and how it translates to film) and wholly unexciting and characters that you learn and care little about, which is not the case with the actual story. The story here starts slowly and never recovers sadly, it did get confused narratively especially in the middle and the rouse, thrills, tension and fun are next to nowhere in sight. The direction is borderline erratic and the pacing makes the film further unengaging. Overall, very bad and as a standalone too, there is the details here but the spirit isn't. It is sad to see Dumas and a great story being done this badly, Albert and Bottoms only just about save it from it not seeing the time of day ever again. 2/10 Bethany Cox
2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?