K-9 and Company: A Girl's Best Friend (TV Movie 1981) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Hardly Brilliant But Not That Bad
Theo Robertson21 September 2005
Hmm some people really have it in for K9 AND COMPANY the first - And to date - only spin off from DOCTOR WHO . I guess if there was any potential spin offs from the legendary fantasy show then two would spring to mind . The first one obviously being a series featuring the Daleks . Terry Nation actually approached American television studios in the late 1960s seeking funding for the metallic meanies but since America never experienced Dalekmania you can see why they wouldn't want to invest in a concept they have no knowledge of . It would have probably been too expensive anyway and almost certainly unfilmable . The recent series of DOCTOR WHO contained breath taking Dalek sequences but that's because television technology has moved on in the last 40 years . The other obvious spin off would have been a show featuring Brigadier Lethbridge Stewart and UNIT but again the amount of military hardware involved would probably have made it prohibitive on financial grounds ( though THE X - FILES isn't a million miles removed from this premise when you think about it ) so instead of what we might have got we ended up with a former journalist and a robotic dog !

I was never keen on K9 during the fourth Doctor's tenure . Every time Tom Baker would be chained to a wall about to be tortured you just knew that K9 was going to appear out of the shadows and shoot the villains with his blaster . So in other words he was a plot device used by very lazy writers during the poorest period of the show seen at that time . As for Sarah Jane Smith I always thought she was slightly overrated as a companion ( She wins every single poll as favourite companion ) possibly because she was the Doctor's sidekick when the show achieved its highest ratings and most critical acclaim in the mid 1970s . I guess John Nathan Turner thought he was onto a winner by resurrecting two popular companions in a pilot for a proposed series

What is very clear by watching this pilot is how self limiting the format is . It's set on present day Earth with no monsters with the villains being pagan worshipers . If it had gone to a full series we'd have seen Sarah and K9 and girlie boy Brendan tackle mad scientists and .. and .. and ... maybe they'd have brought back pagan worshipers for a rematch . Or maybe JNT could have had an alien invasion every third week to break up the monotony of mad scientists and pagan worshipers . No doubt Sarah could have tackled the aliens with her karate ( Where did she learn that ? ) and if that wasn't enough K9 could zap the aliens with his laser - As long as the aliens didn't run up a flight of stairs or hide behind a greenhouse or were able to run faster than three miles per hour .

Despite the poor format there are some good points to this pilot . It contains some impressive night filming which lends itself to some atmospheric moments such as the policeman gingerly walking down a lonely country lane and it's nowhere as badly acted as some people claim , I mean try watching some DOCTOR WHO from the mid to late 1980s to see what bad acting is . Sean Chapman as Peter Tracey has a scene where he bursts into tears of despair and I often think that crying must be difficult for an actor to portray convincingly but here Chapman manages it . I'm not saying he deserves an Oscar but think of all the scenes you've seen on television and in movies where an actor is supposed to be crying and you're asking yourself if their character is laughing or crying ? As for the really crap title sequence or more appropriately the music that goes with it blame Ian Levine , someone who would later produce records for Take That , aka Robbie Williams and those other blokes

Hardly brilliant but not as bad as some people claim K-9 AND COMPANY gets six out of ten
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A sweet, nostalgic, festive spin off.
Sleepin_Dragon4 January 2016
Sarah Jane arrives at her Aunt Lavinia's cottage, but she isn't there, the locals are all highly suspicious, she receives K9 in the post and young Brendan comes to stay with her.

The plot is a little on the thin side, and has been mentioned before the boundaries of the show's format at that time would have prevented a series going very far. For this episode the Pagan villagers work really well.

That said I find K-9 and Company hugely watchable, I suppose for reasons of nostalgia, it has become my official Christmas wrapping show, it goes on, out comes the Baileys, it does have a very festive feel to it.

The acting is a little on the patchy side, most of the performances dare I say it are a little on the theatrical side, but still enjoyable and in keeping with the script, that said I love Juno Baker, played by Linda Polan, she was great fun.

I still love those opening credits and music too!

Not to be taken too seriously, but lots of fun, 7/10
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Popular, But I Like It!
AaronCapenBanner17 August 2013
If one can get past the jarring credit sequence and theme tune(a guilty pleasure of mine, I must confess!)this is a fun special updating us on what's happened to our beloved Sarah Jane Smith(Elizabeth Sladen) since she left the fourth Doctor at the end of 'The Hand Of Fear'.

She has gotten on with her life, and is visiting her aunt's home at Christmastime, when she gets involved in a witch cult of all things, but the unexpected discovery of a forgotten crate(a gift from the Doctor) brings welcome help in the form of K-9 Mark III(voiced by John Leeson), the lovable robotic dog from the series, which arrived in the Tardis after Sarah's time.

The only official spin-off from the classic series is most enjoyable!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spinoffs rarely succeed
Calli-23 November 1999
Spin-offs rarely get anywhere, and "K-9 and Company" is no exception. Now that I have the videotape, I've seen this. I liked it; it's very true to the spirit of "Doctor Who," with a touch of "The Avengers" thrown in. I always was a fan of both K-9 and Sarah Jane Smith; the chance to see them together was simply irresistable.

This takes the tried-and-true "Doctor Who" formula of a mysterious cult with supernatural powers terrorizing the local populace -- "Image of the Fendahl," "Masque of Mandragora," and "Stones of Blood" all toyed with this.

This one takes a more detective-like approach, and benefits well from it.

Unfortunately, I think this pilot was doomed by its opening sequence. The theme song will make you want to beat your head against the wall, because anything else is prefereable to listening to the theme. "K-9. K-9. K-9." That's the lyrics. I think this failed pilot works quite well to support my thesis that unpopular or failed spin-offs generally have really stupid theme songs, while the original show has some terribly memorable and catchy thing.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Prototype of The Sarah Jane Adventures
wetmars7 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I guess this is an okay spin-off? The intro was very 80s as hell, lol.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"He's fantastic!" "Negative."
The_Movie_Cat15 June 2002
I'm very much a closet Doctor Who fan. Not for me public declarations of interest in this most uncredible of programmes. Yet even the usual standards of embarrassment I normally feel about queuing with a Who video were intensified when I saw K-9 and Company in a sale for a fiver and went to "treat" myself.

Opening with a title sequence that combines the pace and structure of terminal diarrhoea with the wit and panache of a kick up the arse this really doesn't bode well. Thrill! To Sarah Jane sipping wine. Chill! To her reading The Guardian. Spill! To her jogging down a road (On a cold day, it seems). The amazing thing is, it actually gets worse.

Imagine a Hammer Horror edition of Crossroads directed by Michael Winner and you still can't begin to come close to the unmitigated crappery of this ferrago. Watching the title sequence (I hate to keep coming back to it, but it's a nightmare that I imagine will haunt me for years to come) you can't believe that its makers were serious. What person in their right mind would seriously believe this would work as a series?

It's strange because no episode of Doctor Who has dated as badly as this. Thirteen minutes in (the unlucky number? It is here) K-9 appears. I always found him endearing in the show, but out of context he doesn't work. Mind you, neither does Sarah Jane. Both are adequate support, neither are stars. K-9 claims to have a nuclear battery and a holographic memory, so you're mistaken if you think he's made out of battered old plastic and a remote control car.

8.4 million idiots actually tuned in to this tot. Producer John Nathan-Turner was never really conversant with the word "taste" and so you just KNOW when K-9 mentions the Doctor the incidental music will segue into a skit of the old Who theme. Tacktastic! In fact Peter Howell's incidental music is a bonus in that it gets "scary" whenever a covert villain is on screen. Handy of him that, as by destroying any suspense he ensures those of a nervous disposition won't get any anxiety from watching it.

Nineteen minutes in and I've lost the will to live. I just don't care anymore. If I died in the next minute it would come as blessed salvation. You sense some of the "we don't normally take to foreigners" schtick is supposed to be a satire of old England values, but even the hero describes someone as looking like a gypsy. This is like The Wicker Man with the focus on the wicker. Characters even trade gardening tips in this story, for God's sake!

The sets look exactly like sets, the acting is chronic, the direction horrendous and the script feeble... is there a single element of this show that doesn't conjure up the word "inept"? It's a strange kind of Television Company that thinks pagan sacrifices are an acceptable form of family entertainment. Though as the majority of the audience were probably comatose by that stage it scarcely seems to matter.

All this requires to take it into seventh Heaven is a Scooby Doo unmasking of the villains, karate stunts from Sarah Jane and K-9 performing a Christmas Carol. Oh dear God take me now. I bet no one has ever compared K-9 and Company to Apocalypse Now, but while I was watching it I couldn't help thinking of a quote from that picture: "The horror, the horror..."
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No way to treat a loyal dog
Prismark1029 July 2013
So K9 was written out of Doctor Who and with the furore from the fans and the media, the producers gave him a spin off show and teamed him with Sarah Jane Smith.

It seems not much attention was paid as to who this series was aimed at. It looks like there was no type of focus group evaluation, it was just quickly green-lit into production.

The final result, a mish mash of ideas that forgot K9 was popular with kids. Therefore a witches coven story line that harks back to Pertwee era Doctor Who might not be the wisest of moves.

For years K9 & Company stuck out like a sore thumb in the Doctor Who canon. Almost a quarter of century later, Russell T Davies effectively tried a second pilot, pushing Sarah Jane to the forefront, surrounding her with some kids and K9 pushed to the background. Even the Doctor turned up a few times.

In essence this pilot provided a bridge to the Sarah Jane Adventures.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
K-9 and Cmpany
gregoryshnly3 January 2007
I think K-9 and Company was a good idea,and Elisabeth Sladen always gives a great performance although Sarah-Jane seems a bit more grumpy than her normal self in this spin-off. John Lesson's voice gives K-9 a life of his own and he makes K-9 very endearing,the opening credits are very bizarre and I am sure not meant to be as funny as they come across. Thngs do seem to take a long time to start,there is a lot of running around until Sarah-Jane opens the box containing K-9. Having recently saw the pilot of The Sarah-Jane adventures,at least K-9 and company wasn't full of annoying kids! and people overacting. It was a good idea,it wasn't a failure,it got respectful viewing figures and K-9 remains a very popular character of DR.Who even today.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sarah gets a spin-off. Is it any good? "NEGATIVE!"
zacpetch11 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Sarah Jane Smith teams up with K9 and so you'd be right to expect that it should be incredible. Sadly it fails miserably. This was a spin-off pilot that was meant to follow on from Doctor Who after Sarah had parted company from the Fourth Doctor but no series ever came from it. Watching it, it's not hard to see why!

Things start badly with an opening titles sequence so hilariously bad that it transcends even the realm of 'so bad it's good' and becomes 'so bad it's funny'. You'll laugh out loud at it's preposterousness, or maybe the laughter is a defence mechanism to help spare yourself the pain of watching it. Sadly these titles are the best thing here as everything that follows them is very slow and uninteresting.

The plot -- Just kidding there isn't one! There's a story, if you can keep awake long enough to pay attention, about what happens when Sarah and her new robot-dog K9 investigate a culture of witchcraft in a standard 1980s country village where her aunt lives. There's supposed to be a mystery element to it because the aunt in question has vanished but this is undermined when Sarah gets a phone call at the end of the episode from her aunt who has left to go to America earlier than planned without telling anyone, as you do. It's not the only twist either, I think it's meant to be one when the identity of the pagan worshippers are revealed but it's really hard to care for anyone in the episode to be bothered by it. The whole thing is a dull, boring, predictable, by the numbers snooze-fest.

There are a few guilty pleasures hidden among the horrifically bad stuff on display. Elizabeth Sladen is still wonderful as THE definitive companion (even if her companion days are now behind her) and K9 automatically improves anything he's in just by mere association with another pitch-perfect vocal performance from John Leeson. There's a great use of the recurring "Doctor Who?" gag (Who's the Doctor? Affirmative!) which is always fun and gives us the only reference to the Doctor (Peter 'Davison' Moffett, at the time). Still, the whole thing just feels wrong and insulting to everything it touches.

I would only recommend this to the most hardcore of Doctor Who fans and even then only watch it as an educational exercise. Sadly, the 2006 episode "School Reunion" confirms this as canon which means we have to remember it happened. This did redeem itself with anther spin-off 'The Sarah Jane Adventures' which proves that the formula can work. You're left, after enduring this monstrosity, wondering how it went so wrong the first time around.

I'll finish by saying this: If you have something 'Doctor Who' related and Elizabeth Sladen can't save it you know there's a problem. I give it 3/10 because of her performance.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
K-9 would say--"Affirmative!!!"
mjshannon7 October 2002
Most of the other reviewers here can't seem to get past the theme song--yeah, it's silly but hardly something you would want to commit suicide over! The producer John Nathan Turner wanted a Hart To Hart opening credit sequence and that was a bit of a bad idea considering that the two leads in this are a woman and a mechanical dog! However, there is something bizarrely funny about it that acually draws you in. Maybe it's the camera zooming in on K-9 sitting on a stone fence--just how the hell did he get up there?! All of that aside, the actual story of witchcraft in the English countryside is rather fun stuff. There is some nice nightime atmosphere surrounding the coven's ceremonies and the actors who portray the various locals are all well cast. The only real negative is the short running time which is why there is not a lot of tension built. If one reads the novel it can be seen there was much more going on in the background to create tension but this does an acceptable job. Anyone who takes this too seriously or gets mad over this needs to relax and take a few deep breaths. This is great fun in the solid tradition of Doctor Who and it is too bad it never became a series.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Too bad this didn't become a series
JeffG.5 July 1999
I rather enjoyed this pilot episode of this proposed "Doctor Who" spinoff series. Too bad the BBC didn't pick it up as a series because I think it showed promise.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
K9!...K9!...K9!...K9!...K9!...
zedthedestroyer7 September 2001
After wading through several ideas for Doctor Who's one `official' spin-off (including a UNIT series I believe), John Nathan-Turner decided to base a series on K9. After all, there were times when the metal dog had received more fan mail than Tom Baker.

In short, the pilot episode has an older and wiser Sarah Jane Smith returning to her home village. She finds a box that the Doctor sent her years ago containing K9 Mark 3. Being the nosy investigative journalist she is, Sarah Jane soon become involved in stopping the activities of a coven of witches. Thank goodness she has K9 and her geeky cousin Brendan helping her.

It doesn't look promising from the first second of the theme song (something I'm sure Nathan-Turner wrote during lunch one day), and the plot is not all that engaging. In fact, there are times it seems you're watching bits of some of the Earthbound Doctor Who episodes cobbled together. Perhaps because of these factors, K9 & Company didn't make it to Episode 2.

For completists only.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
One woman and her dog
ShadeGrenade10 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Until the arrival of 'Torchwood' in 2007, 'K-9 & Company' held the honour of being the only spin-off from the world's longest running sci-fi series - 'Dr.Who'. It is, as the title implies, about the Doctor's robotic companion 'K-9' - created by Bob Baker and Dave Martin - who had been part of the show since 1977's 'The Invisible Enemy' and was written out at the end of 'Warriors' Gate' in 1980. The news of its departure caused much media fuss, with tabloids such as 'The Sun' running campaigns to keep him from being put back in the kennels. Producer John Nathan-Turner thought it a good idea to try K-9 out in his own vehicle. Not quite on his own, though, as he would be sharing it with former companion 'Sarah Jane Smith' ( the late Elisabeth Sladen ), last seen in 'The Hand Of Fear' in 1976.

Sarah travels to the sleepy English village of Moreton Harwood to spend Christmas with her 'Aunt Lavinia' ( referenced as far back as Sarah's 1974 debut story 'The Time Warrior' ), only to find her missing. A mysterious coven devoted to the god Hecate is at work. Luckily for Sarah, she has help, partly from her aunt's nerdy ward 'Brendan Richards' ( Ian Sears ) and K-9 himself, who has been given to her by the Doctor ( which beggars the question - how many versions of K-9 are there? Leela got one, as did Romana, so this must be Mark 3. Are there others we should know about? ). Suspicion as to who is behind the coven falls on local rich woman 'Juno Baker' ( I suspect the choice of surname was a unsubtle reference to the great Tom ), played by the late Linda Polan.

'K-9 & Company - A Girl's Best Friend' was written by Terence Dudley, who had directed 'Meglos' for the previous season of 'Dr.Who' and whom would write three Peter Davision stories - 'Four To Doomsday', 'Black Orchid', and 'The King's Demons'. Unsurprisingly, it bears a strong resemblance to the parent show, most notably Jon Pertwee's 'The Daemons' ( 1971 ). It was good to have Sladen back as 'Sarah Jane', effortlessly moving into the role normally fulfilled by the Doctor. Among the supporting cast were old reliables such as Bill Fraser and Colin Jeavons, both of whom had appeared in 'Dr.Who'. There's not a lot one can say about this - its reasonably entertaining and went some way towards filling the interminable gap between the final part of 'Logopolis' and the first part of 'Castrovalva'. Ratings were good, but the option of a series was not picked up on. However, the 1983 K-9 annual ( published a year later ) gives one an idea what it might have been like.

Undermining the piece is a dreadful title sequence ( shot as an imitation of U.S. shows such as 'Hart To Hart' ) which makes Sladen look foolish, and a theme tune by Fiacra Trench and Ian Levine so banal as to make Neal Hefti's 'Batman' sound great, consisting as it does of 'K-9' being repeated ad nauseaum interspersed with electronic bleeps and bloops.

Twenty-five years later, Sarah Jane and K-9 returned to 'Dr.Who' in the excellent 'School Reunion' episode, and this in turn led to the 'Sarah Jane Adventures' which featured little of the metal mutt. Sladen's death in April 2011 was mourned by both young and old alike. She was really special.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A typical misjudgment from John Nathan-Turner
kmoh-119 November 2017
John Nathan-Turner's time as producer of Dr Who (1980-9) was a frightful mess. Clearly out of his depth, his period at the helm was characterised largely by thrashing around with gimmicks to compensate for small budgets, miscasting, poor scripting and uncertainties of tone, whose accumulation had begun during Graham William's tenure, but which accelerated dramatically from Nathan-Turner's first season (season 18) onwards.

One problem that Nathan-Turner faced was that the audience was ageing, and sci-fi nerds were beginning to define the show to the detriment of its universal qualities. It was therefore potentially a shrewd move to develop the one-off TV movie K9 and Company, coupling Dr Who's favourite companion, Sarah Jane, who still lingered in the memory, with his most asinine, for younger viewers. If this reached fruition as a series, maybe a new younger audience could be cultivated?

Of course, he muffed it. The filming does not appear to have been a happy experience, at least for Elisabeth Sladen, according to her memoirs. But the appalling script, the embarrassing public school nephew Brendan, the weedy attacker Peter, a goodly set of well-known character actors reduced to oo-arrr dialogue, and a set of unintentionally comic pagans all combine to kill it anyway. The wonderful support actress Mary Wimbush is particularly wasted. The execrable title sequence is a microcosm of the failure of the whole enterprise.

Lots of people watched it; I was one of them. I wanted to love it, especially as it came shortly after the very disappointing season 18. I hated it. I assumed I was just growing too big for Dr Who, but, now we can watch these shows again on DVD, it is clear that Dr Who was leaving its audience, not the other way round.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
K9 rules all
ty-4143318 June 2022
Quite simply the best Dr Who spin off that anyone has made. Including Big Finish. Seeing SJS with the Original K9 is a joy. Even the theme music is wonderful.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed