Flames of Passion (1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Arrogant in conception, sweet in execution.
alice liddell6 September 1999
The video cover proclaims that FLAMES OF PASSION is a witty deconstruction of the masterly BRIEF ENCOUNTER. It is nothing of the sort. Lean's film is achingly romantic, with a submerged passion, aware of the deep need for transgression, and ruefully admitting of its impossibility. Its writer, Noel Coward, was himself gay, fully aware that his fame rested on a campness whose reality could have landed him in jail. Laura's defeat at the end is not supported by the film - it is a great tragedy. David Lean has a noble record of criticism against repression. BRIEF ENCOUNTER is, therefore, already a camp classic. There is something patronising about the idea that the film needs to be deconstructed, improved, its supposedly 'antique' ideology made acceptable for modern audiences.

To be honest, I don't think this was the film's intention, and its director may be slightly embarrassed by the video's description. The similarities with BRIEF ENCOUNTER do not appear to extend far beyond the fact that it is set in a railway station, which is modern and antiseptic, not as smokily romantic as the 1945 film.

The story concerns a smart, professional commuter, who through chance and unwilling persistance becomes involved with a man who seemingly leaves cryptic clues for him, eventually culminating in a proposal of marriage. This idea of a detective story, which suggest a power over time and fate (on the part of the detective) is the most obvious differentiation from BRIEF ENCOUNTER, whose characters were utterly trapped by those terrifying abstractions.

The short is divided into seven sections, each representing a day of the week, figuring the professional's clean, rigid life, which is rudely shattered by desire. The authority he initially has over his life falters as he gives into this desire and imagination begins to enter the equation, as it may never have done before, blowing apart his reassuring coordinates of time and space. Reality and dream merge, and the narrative momentum, as well as the stylistic clarity, become increasingly blurred, undermining the eventual resolution. On the one level, the happiness denied Laura and Alec seems to be available to the film's protagonists; but the unreliability of the film's reality makes us question this complacent assumption. This pragmatism means the film has perhaps more in common with its model than it would care to admit. The director's feature debut would be LOVE AND DEATH IN LONG ISLAND, which tackles similar themes more conventionally.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
passion in 1989
jromanbaker11 January 2020
This is one of the great same-sex films, and it is a pity it is not more available. I fortunately have it on the original Connoisseur video, and recently I excavated it from my attic. Having not seen it for so many years I was overwhelmed by its visual beauty and its romanticism. This film was made when the AIDS crisis was cruelly killing off so many, and putting others into a state of torture through fear they might get infected, or already were, without knowing it, but were too afraid to find out. Also, in society in general, the spirit of the times was lethal towards the homosexual population. The fear of drinking from the same teacup that a gay person had drunk from was no myth, and that was the nice side. Psychological cruelty was rampant, even among gay men themselves. I experienced a lot of this before and after my partner died.

It is in this context the film was made, in all its six small scenes and 18 minutes of length. Here is a man dreaming of love, finding the man he wants to be with and well, the ending is both a reality and the taboo of all taboos - they kiss and embrace on a train. I wonder how many people were given a respite from fear and a hope for a normal life again, and how many read the words on the screen 'Marry Me' not ever dreaming that this too would become a reality. This is not 'Maurice' set in the first years of the 20th C and in its way it was more relevant to those who were going through such mental struggles. And in my opinion, simply from the expert silent actors and their clear passion for each other, the director managed to express equally silently. look how simple and normal love is. Or as D.H. Lawrence said in a poem, 'Look, we have come through!'
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed