Up 1,831 this week

Blood Cult (1985)

Video  -  Horror  -  May 1985 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.3/10 from 287 users  
Reviews: 15 user | 11 critic

Female students on a college campus are being killed and their body parts used for blood sacrifices.



, (additional dialogue)
0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 199 titles
created 29 Mar 2011
a list of 144 titles
created 24 Nov 2012
a list of 42 titles
created 05 Apr 2013
a list of 558 titles
created 9 months ago
a list of 37 titles
created 2 months ago
Search for "Blood Cult" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Blood Cult (Video 1985)

Blood Cult (Video 1985) on IMDb 3.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Blood Cult.


Cast overview, first billed only:
Juli Andelman ...
Tina Wilbois (as Julie Andelman)
Charles Ellis ...
Ron Wilbois
Joel Hogan
Bennie Lee McGowan ...
Mrs. Gracie Moore
Peter Hart ...
Doc White (as Josef Hardt)
David Stice ...
Deputy (as David Brent Stice)
Fred Graves ...
Dean Charles Bailey
Bob Duffield ...
Mr. Moore
Allison O'Meilia ...
Girl in Shower
Christi Beavers ...
Bryan Gilbreath ...
Boy at Party
Robbie Cobb ...
Joy Jordan ...
Girl in Cafeteria
Mary Dickens ...
Carolyn Wallace ...


A mysterious serial killer is killing several female co-eds on and off a college campus in Oklahoma and the only clues are gold medallions left by the bodies. A grizzled police detective sets out to find the killer, but is unaware that all the killings are connected to a Satanic cult. The detective, Ron, turns from the hunter to the hunted when he sees that no one around him can be trusted, not even his own daughter. Written by matt-282

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


in the tradition of horror legends "Psycho," "Halloween," and "Friday the 13th" See more »




Not Rated | See all certifications »




Release Date:

May 1985 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Slasher  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office


$27,000 (estimated)

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


The film score was done for $1,000 dollars. See more »


Tina's pearl necklace alternates between being tucked inside her dress and being outside of same from shot to shot while talking to her father in the library. See more »


Referenced in The Cinema Snob: Video Violence (2009) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Not all THAT bad
4 July 2003 | by (New Jersey) – See all my reviews

I've been reading a book by screenwriter John Russo called "Making Movies," and that's the main reason why I was curious about checking this movie out in the first place. I read a chapter talking about how this was the first direct-to-video movie ever made, and the budget was extremely small. Being an aspiring filmmaker, I'm more intrigued by the small-budget films than those with big budgets. I don't visualize myself making the next summer blockbuster in 2 or 3 years, but I do visualize myself making a small-budget independent film or, to be more realistic, a small-budget student film. And it always fascinates me how filmmakers are able to make movies on such low budgets, using just the bare essentials and sometimes less.

Some have complained about the movie being shot on video. I happened to appreciate the look of the movie. Though it could've been much better, by watching "Blood Cult" I realized that shooting a feature-length movie on regular video equipment is not a bad idea. We almost never see a movie shot on video, but there are many TV shows (sitcoms, soap operas, reality shows, etc.) that are shot on video, and it doesn't exactly break the fourth wall. As long as you don't frame shots like you're framing your aunt in a home video, the movie can look quite cool. So I definitely felt Christopher Lewis (the director) came up with a fine concept. Hey, it's better to watch old video footage than grainy old film footage. Film shows its age much more.

I've seen a lot of bad horror movies, and I've seen much worse. "BC" is not completely awful, considering its standards. I tried to think of it as a student film. When you watch a student film, you're not expecting "The Godfather." So I took it with a grain of salt, accepting the movie for what it is and keeping its microscopic budget in mind.

First of all, the acting is fairly good. Of course, I'm discounting the women who played the victims, whose screams were so unconvincing. I don't know anybody who flaps their arms like a bird when they scream. The now-deceased actor who plays the sheriff is pretty good, and it's obvious that he was a veteran of stage. However, there are a couple of scenes where he's obviously looking down at his lines on a cheat sheet. He could've been a little more subtle. Most of the performances are one-dimensional, but so are the characters. So what can you do? Plus, I've heard much worse dialogue in horror movies as well.

The special f/x are beyond cheesy, with body parts that look they were purchased from Party City on Halloween. But you just have to laugh at stuff like that.

The story is not bad, and gets better as it goes along. As I've said, there are much cheesier horror movies out there, and "BC" is mildly impressive for its budget. Not a great film, not even a good film, but worth a look.

My score: 5 (out of 10)

10 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Not the first. vrtgoflw
Discuss Blood Cult (1985) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: