The Adventures of the Prince and the Pauper (1969) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Could have been much better.
phillindholm25 October 2005
Mark Twain's classic novel "The Prince And The Pauper" has been filmed several times, most notably in 1937 with the Mauch Twins portraying the title characters and Errol Flynn playing hero Miles Hendon. This low-budget adaptation was filmed in 1969. It was the first musical production of the story, based on an Off-Broadway play, which was produced back in 1962. Both prince and pauper were played by Girls(!) in that show which also marked the stage debut of singer/actor John Davidson in the Miles Hendon part. Intended (or fated) as a kiddie matinée attraction, the film was supposedly shot in Ireland, but there is little evidence of that here. Castles are used for both establishing and background shots, but it's obvious no interiors were filmed in them. Most of the action takes place on a handful of claustrophobic sets (even the outdoor scenes lack scope) in a decidedly uncinematic style, totally inappropriate for a musical. To make matters worse (possibly in an attempt to keep the attention of restless moppets), everything is photographed in an very annoying, in-your-face manner, with slapstick usually found only in silent comedies jarringly tossed in. Both adaptation and direction are about evenly matched for dullness (the screenplay barely scrapes the surface of the original novel), and the less said about the "costumes", the better. What a shame, because the no-name cast (a mixture of American and British performers) are attractive and engaging, with Gene Bua a standout as Miles Hendon. The songs by George Fischoff and Verna Tomasson are catchy and likable and well performed by the actors, who deserved a better showcase than this. Alas, the producers were apparently content to grind it out as cheaply as possible, and this is only too obvious. Not surprisingly, the film vanished after it's spotty playdates and was soon forgotten. The music and lyrics, however, suggest that a much better movie could (and should) have been made. There was a soundtrack album issued (long out of print) on Pickwick records, which leaves a much better impression than the film.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Review
altarr831 July 2012
"If Grade-Z horror icon Andy Milligan made a children's musical, it might look very much like this most unusual Kiddie Matinée offering...engaging and accomplished independent feature film...handsome production values...most endearing is its bouncy faux-Broadway score...very lively, very real late '60s curiosity...combines elements of historical film drama with refreshing touches of the new wave...evokes both OLIVER TWIST and FUTZ...increases exposure to and raises the level of world children's cinema...a lofty goal...but a noble one."
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed