After the abduction by the US military of an Islamic religious leader, New York City becomes the target of escalating terrorist attacks. Anthony Hubbard, the head of the FBI's Counter-Terrorism Task Force in New York, teams up with CIA operative Elise Kraft to hunt down the terrorist cells responsible for the attacks. As the bombings continue, the US government responds by declaring martial law, sending US troops, led by Gen. Devereaux, into the streets of New York City. Written by
Karen Eiler <email@example.com>
In several scene General William Devereaux is seen not wearing U.S. Army General uniform, instead he's seen wearing ordinary jacket and tie suit. It is revealed that General Devereaux is actually holding a position in the president's cabinet while retaining his Army commission as a major general, possibly national security advisor or white house chief of staff. This resembled to Alexander Haig who was Richard Nixon Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and later white house chief of staff while retaining his General ranks in the army or Colin Powell who was Ronald Reagan's national security advisor while also retaining his General ranks in the army and later known as "political general". See more »
At the strategy meeting, one of the participants cites Lincoln's suspension of Habeas Corpus in 1862. Another states that this act was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court and cites the case "Ex Parte Milligan." The actual case for this incident is "Ex Parte Merryman." The Milligan case involved the military trial of a civilian. The case determined that civilians cannot be tried in military courts, except under specific circumstances, which the Milligan case did not meet. See more »
This fictional movie showed us what was coming. And they showed us what not to do!
This was a very strange film. Strange, because it had so many of its facts right for 9/11. Right city, right jihadists, right plot.
And the military's answer to the terrorist threats? Go in, plunder, pillage, torture, abuse and kill the bad guys. Moral? If we stoop to their level, we are no better than the enemy. The real irony is, Denzel's character had the CHARACTER to do the right thing.
Oddly, and presciently, Bruce Willis' general was about to do all the wrong stuff, and with a little help from Denzel, decided not to resort to all the things we really have resorted to. This movie is notable for several reasons, but the uppermost is showing us the future we shouldn't take, but took anyway.
The irony is not lost. What is confounding here is how much of this originally semi-corny movie got right. Washington, Benning, Shaloub, and Willis, all deliver in a big fashion, with some pertinent warnings. The road not taken was the moral. How scary that in the long run, when presented by a much larger threat, we one-upped this movie's punch line in reality. How much stranger can you get than that?
This was a fairly realistic portrait of the underworld, the intrigue, the terrorism, and gave us a scary view of our future. Hopefully, next time a movie like this one comes along, we might be better served by taking it more seriously.
73 of 101 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?