MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 14,109 this week

Joan of Arc (1900)
"Jeanne d'Arc" (original title)

6.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.8/10 from 339 users  
Reviews: 2 user | 3 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (story)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 37 titles
created 11 Jan 2012
 
a list of 25 titles
created 03 Jun 2012
 
list image
a list of 543 titles
created 9 months ago
 
a list of 3067 titles
created 9 months ago
 
list image
a list of 127 titles
created 2 weeks ago
 

Search for "Jeanne d'Arc" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Joan of Arc (1900)

Joan of Arc (1900) on IMDb 6.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Joan of Arc.

User Polls

Edit

Cast

Cast overview:
Bleuette Bernon
Jeanne d'Alcy ...
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Short | Drama | History

Edit

Details

Country:

Release Date:

11 November 1900 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Joan of Arc  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:

Color:

(hand-colored)|
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Featured in Henri Langlois: The Phantom of the Cinémathèque (2004) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Méliès Inventing the Story Film
16 September 2009 | by See all my reviews

This is an elaborate production for its time, with 11 tableaux, 250 meters and a runtime of 10 minutes. Additionally, the print available on the Flicker Alley set is wonderfully hand-colored. There's also a nice vision scene-within-a-scene, which is a rather common, but appreciated, occurrence in early films. On the other hand, this early story film especially seems to be bogged down by Méliès's typical theatrical style, perhaps because it's a historical reenactment film rather than some amusing fantasy or fairytale. I don't find it as entertaining as his later films such as "Bluebeard" (1901), "A Trip to the Moon" (1902) and "The Kingdom of the Fairies" (1903), which more greatly overcome their stagy and primitive qualities. For instance, the revolving parade scene and the lame battle are goofed even for 1900. In addition, Méliès plays too many different roles in this one, which could have been confusing without the lecture provided.

Nevertheless, it would take a couple years before other film pioneers, including Edwin S. Porter, Robert W. Paul and Ferdinand Zecca, to name a few, began to make narrative films to compare to this one. "Joan of Arc" came on the heels of Méliès's earlier and first super-production "Cinderella" (1899), which, like this film, connected its tableaux by dissolves. "Joan of Arc" is somewhat more polished than "Cinderella" was, as, likewise, Méliès's later féeries (fairy films) are more refined and sophisticated than this film.

Also of note, Joan of Arc has always been a popular screen subject. The first filmed version I know of was by the Edison Company in 1895. The Lumiére Company made a shot-scene reenactment of the trial, titled "Execution of Joan of Arc" (Exécution de Jeanne d'Arc), just a year before Méliès's film. The Lumiére film, which has been available on home video, isn't worthwhile except for perhaps that it, too, survives in a hand-colored print. When I saw it, and when considering its title and that they only had a single shot-scene, I wondered why they wouldn't use the hand coloring to exploit the attraction of a burning at the stake. Méliès didn't miss opportunities like that.


8 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Joan of Arc (1900) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page