Down 8,313 this week

Wavelength (1967)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.9/10 from 1,104 users  
Reviews: 19 user | 10 critic

Add a Plot



0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 28 titles
created 19 Jul 2011
a list of 45 titles
created 19 Apr 2012
a list of 30 titles
created 03 Mar 2013
a list of 25 titles
created 11 months ago

Related Items

Search for "Wavelength" on

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Wavelength (1967)

Wavelength (1967) on IMDb 5.9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Wavelength.
1 win. See more awards »


Credited cast:
Hollis Frampton
Lyne Grossman
Naoto Nakazawa
Roswell Rudd
Amy Taubin
Joyce Wieland
Amy Yadrin


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis






Release Date:

28 March 2003 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs



See  »

Did You Know?


Chosen by the Audio-Visual Preservation Trust of Canada to be preserved for future generations. See more »


Strawberry Fields Forever
Written by John Lennon & Paul McCartney
Performed by The Beatles
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Structuralist purgatorio
14 May 1999 | by (los angeles) – See all my reviews

The lodestar of contemporary avant cinema, Michael Snow's short purports to be a single zoom across a seedy office/warehouse space--a lens adjustment that takes forty-five minutes to complete. The truth of the matter--unmentioned even in Manny Farber's pioneering rave for the picture--is that the movie isn't all one shot. Snow fudges the "formalist rigor" for which he got his reputation: the movement from wide shot of the room to a pixel-enhancing closeup of a photograph of ocean waves is speckled with negative inserts, black, white and orange blank screens, and psychedelic rewinds of the scene that just came before.

Like Hollis Frampton's ZORNS LEMMA, WAVELENGTH is the kind of picture made to be written about, not really endured. The glowing descriptions of it in critics' prose are more provoking than the actual artifact itself. Two things remain striking and puzzling about it thirty-two years later. Why did Snow choose to make a near-hour-long demonstration of the zoom lens? Why would tracking have been any different--is the movie meant to be a statement on a subjective appearance of changed perspective, while the viewer really remains static? Or was Snow just infatuated with the gimmickry of the zoom? (Each calibration churning closer to the photograph has a home-movie clunkiness.)

The other is the oddly hippie-dippie tone of Snow's inserted gimcrackery. From the charwoman-looking extra playing "Strawberry Fields Forever" on a radio, then lumbering off like a bit player in an Ed Wood number, to the acid-flashback reruns of just-passed scenes, to the freak colorizations of arbitrary moments (as if we jumped to the POV of a UFO), the ambience is much more Big Brother and the Holding Company than Robert Bresson. It's the same playing-with-a-gizmo amateurism that mars the images using people in Stan Brakhage's DOG STAR MAN, and it makes Snow's academic astringency look like a pose.

(WAVELENGTH showed up again, ripped off in the unlikeliest place: the track into a photograph that forms the "Twilight Zone" epilogue to Kubrick's THE SHINING.)

14 of 23 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Man, I would like to see this RivenWinner
6.8/10? shortsnipes
Does the photo change? pstumpf
Utter garbage. beelzebud
Did anyone see the sea move? Moviemadness2012
Where I can find HD quality egibest_egi
Discuss Wavelength (1967) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page