User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
It's an adult film, not a feature
butterman_199921 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
**** WARNING MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS **** A little warning to anyone thinking this was a "real" film about the Marquis; it wasn't - It was one of many Joe D'Amato "legit" adult features he did in the mid-late 90s (see "Torero", "Sahara", "Queen Of The Elephants", "Messalina", etc.). D'Amato brought the harder euro core to international video stores in the guise of triple-X features, an alternative to the slightly more hard "Playboy channel" type of features Andrew Blake was doing, also on 35mm. In fact what separated D'Amato from other smut filmographers was both his visual style as well as shooting on film, a costly production which most of his USA counterparts did not actively do. D'Amato essentially made X-rated films with a story line, shot on 35mm.

In essence, if you go into a Joe D'Amato film from this era expecting anything else than am "above-average" (in terms of production values) X-rated feature, you will be sorely disappointed.

"Marquis" here is one of a few Rocco vehicles he did with D'Amato about the same time he was breaking in the US market with his pal John Staggliano who created the Evil Angel/Empire production company. Anyone not familiar with the Rocco style, as displayed in previous reviews, are in for a shock as the "italian stallion" 's style is not for the faint of heart (as a side note to those unfamiliar with the Rocco style, he kept increasing his level of intensity as time progressed, especially in his own later productions until his retirement). Perhaps D'Amato and his crew believed that only Rocco could actually portray their interpretation of the Marquis due to his unique form of performance intensity, rather that a more direct interpretation.

D'Amato's film features some good performances from most of the cast, with an obvious twist towards the slightly more demented than anything "erotic". Rocco's wife Rosa performs with him in two scenes, Vicca (aka Victoria Queen) is criminally underused, Christoph Clark does another stint at an attempt at over-acting (with hilarious results), and the infamous Shalamar scene is partially cut/censored on DVD re-issues of the film (although I was lucky to find a vintage french-dubbed VHS of the un-cut complete version).

Again, this is not a "film" but an X-rated feature.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very Poor D'Amato
Michael_Elliott7 July 2009
Marquis de Sade (1994)

* (out of 4)

Extremely distasteful adult film from D'Amato tries to tell us how de Sade came up with all his strange sexual visions. We see him get seduced as a young kid and quickly grow up to try and sleep with any woman near him. This is a pretty disgusting short as it pretty much focuses on pain and humiliation. If you're into that type of thing then I'm sure you'll love this but others should stay clear. The film pretty much has de Sade (Rocco Siffredi) spitting on people, trying to choke them and in one scene peeing on them. He's always wanting to do something humiliating to them and to me this wasn't sexy, interesting and it especially wasn't entertaining. The entire movie was a real pain to sit through because of how ugly it is. Even the rather good cinematography gets lost in all the junk. I've read Siffredi was known for this type of film but I'm not an expert on adult films so I have no real idea. Either way, I will continue to go through D'Amato's work but I hope to stay away from the actor.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Supposed to show how Marquis de Sade was into strange sex.
Pam-1116 August 1998
The only strange sex they have is anal sex, and Marquis de Sade keeps SPITTING on everyone. Using your spit for lubricant is fine, but does he have to spit from a foot above everyone?
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Classic Rocco Porno.
adlfmhd14 March 2022
Loved it. For any of you who wants to see this movie or film. You have to acknowledge the fact that this is a Freacking Porno, right??? So do not criticize it like its philospical movie or going to give us some deep message. For anyone who thinks lets learn about Sadism or the philosphy of Sade, and Opens this movie, I can say that Go READ a book or a F-ing documentary. I mean since when we try to learn about philosophy or other serious stuffs by watching pornos?

I loved the movie, It was pretty tame for 1994. I am tired of snowflake men... they get offended for women. HEY? Can we let women be offended for themselves? The women who were in this movie, they were not hostages they knew rocco, and they knew what they were up to.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Won't watch
divrdwn22 August 2007
After coming to see the review on this movie, I decided right off that I would't watch it when I saw that Siffredi is in it. IMO, he is one of the most egotistical and disgusting performers in movies. He has the misguided perception that he is the saviour for all females in their sex lives. As stated in another review he apparently likes to spit in his partner's face, likes to choke her in "teaching" her to deep throat, and almost totally prefers rough anal sex. Real "lovable" kinda guy, huh? If that is what the females are into, good for them. But for some reason I come away with the perception it is all for his own egotism in being able to degrade them as he does. One never gets to see his wife being treated in such a manner by some male partner. And yes she was a female porn star.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed