IMDb user comments for
John Wayne Bobbitt Uncut (1994) (V) More at IMDbPro »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 8 reviews in total 

3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
More like John Wayne Bobbitt uncircumcised!, 15 March 2002
Author: Noel Bailey (uds3@hotmail.com) from Longmont: Colorado US

Ever since Lorena made her mark in the world with her amateur penisectomy, hubby John Wayne has had stars in his eyes (replacing the original tears!) The experience left him dying for more....stardom that is, and this flick was a minor "hit" in all the wrong circles. It was followed by half a dozen porno roles that must have caused him more pain than the original stand-up comedy routine!

I caught up with it at a stag party some years ago. There probably ARE worse porn flicks but I can't imagine it. About as sexually exciting as a dose of the runs, this low grade, low rent, low budget home-movie cashes in on Lorena's famed surgery. I will not bore u with the plot - there isn't one!

A couple of the girls might have been pretty, but there again, I'd had a lot to drink...they might not even have been girls! Do yourself a favor - never see this film then you'll never be tempted to write a non-critique like this!

Was the above comment useful to you?

3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
What can I say?, 19 February 1999
Author: PH-8 from Knoxville, Tennessee

I am typing this with both hands. That should give you some indication of the rancidity of this movie.

Was the above comment useful to you?

2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
It's a shame of porn, 16 November 2002
1/10
Author: rafabba from Brazil

I think it's the worst porn ever made, it's very comic the first scenes when they are acting just like happened, the scene of the lady driving and holding the piece of Bobbitt's penis (of course a cut dildo) is hilarious. The sex scenes are so bad that Ron Jeremy appeared just to put some spice on the movie, even though he didn't get it. Another bad point are the girls, they are not so pretty and unfortunately they have a hard job to set Bobbit's penis up. A pure piece of rubbish. 1 out of 10.

Was the above comment useful to you?

2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Well...it's a porno. What did you expect?, 22 November 1999
2/10
Author: Phil_H from United States

Out of a morbid sense of curiosity, I had to rent this movie just once. And I must admit, that all I wanted to know was if his member functioned properly after the reconstructive surgery. Yes and no, is all I can say. Watch it yourself. If for no other reason but to see some really hot women get it on with a loser like Bobbit. Oh, and Lemme Kilmeister (of Motorhead) is in there as well.

As least we know it still works. Not much too different from your average XXX feature, really.

Was the above comment useful to you?

4 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Pretty bad, 28 February 2005
1/10
Author: Wayne Malin (wwaayynnee51@hotmail.com) from United States

I saw this back in 1994 out of some morbid curiosity. I was working at a video store which stocked it. I had no interest originally (I'm a gay guy--why would I want to see a straight porn flick?) but Bobbitt WAS a good-looking guy and I was mildly curious to see if everything--ummm---"worked". After half an hour I turned it off. The acting was atrocious--the production values were nonexistent and NONE of the girls were attractive. As for Bobbitt--everything looks OK but it looks like he was "short changed" (if you know what I mean). Frankly I wouldn't do porno if I had as little as he did. Until this one "Debbie Does Dallas" was the worst straight porn I ever saw. This has it beaten by a mile.

Was the above comment useful to you?

1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Crap., 17 November 1998
Author: Russ1681 from Adelaide

This movie is pretty bad. It is a very low-budget porno with appalling camerawork and bad sex. Some of the girls are pretty, but you don't get to see anything and...well, it's budget.

Was the above comment useful to you?

why doesn't anyone love this movie?!?!, 28 May 2008
5/10
Author: rebschucks from Carbondale, IL

This was the first porno I had ever seen. First week of college 1996 my newfound friends and I bonded over JWB:Uncut - Okay, so the acting is bad, but no worse than any other porn I saw thereafter. And as for pure entertainment value, the, ahem, cut-to scene just after Lorena does the deed is one of the most hysterical things I have ever witnessed. Of course, after the big "reveal" I suppose there's not much else to see.

I won't argue that it's pure trash, and probably if you're using the film for solo viewing, yeah, I guess it's probably pretty distracting and not very useful. But if you're looking for something stupid to watch on a late night with your friends, I highly recommend it!

Was the above comment useful to you?

2 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
it's a shame lorena didn't throw the other part away..., 31 August 2002
Author: MIKEHILL38 (MIKEHILL38@HOTMAIL.COM) from manchester, england

ugh! what a load of filth! i thought this was a film about john wayne. where was maureen o' hara? this was a pivotally cocked portrayal of one man's full frontal attack on his wife who quite literally took the law into her own hands and became a global celebrity. better luck next time lorena!

Was the above comment useful to you?

Add another review

Related Links

Ratings Awards External reviews
Official site Plot keywords Main details
Your user reviews Your vote history