MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 13,958 this week

You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997)

 -  Short  -  7 February 1997 (USA)
3.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.6/10 from 159 users  
Reviews: 6 user

Add a Plot

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb at Comic-Con 2014

Follow our coverage of Comic-Con 2014, direct from San Diego July 23-27 in our Comic-Con section.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 905 titles
created 5 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997)

You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997) on IMDb 3.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of You're Still Not Fooling Anybody.

User Polls

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Himself (archive footage)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Short

Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

7 February 1997 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Edited from Kiss Me Deadly (1955) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
What happened, Mike?
30 April 2006 | by (Denmark) – See all my reviews

Not long after watching the fairly interesting documentary "Who Do You Think You're Fooling?" by Mike White, which makes good comparisons between Reservoir Dogs and City on Fire, I watched this 'sequel'... where Mike - as opposed to seeming like a bright man with good, argumentative points - just comes off like a whiny little kid. With the exception of one or two of the five(count 'em, five) minor similarities between Pulp Fiction and other, earlier films, none of them have any real merit, and/or are too obvious to waste time mentioning. This starts off with a reply from Tarantino to White's first documentary, which is fitting... but from there on out, it just falls flat. The comparisons range from vague to downright embarrassing. It's like Mikey got real drunk one night, got the idea for this and didn't sober up until it was too late... until the film was out and had been seen by too many people to be forgotten, its existence denied. Why he felt it necessary to make a sequel to the first, I have no idea. This is just embarrassing. Should only be watched by those seeking to take perverse pleasure in watching White mess up. I recommend this only to the Tarantino-lovers who were offended by the(arguably quite meritorious) criticisms of the first documentary and who's looking for a cheap laugh. 3/10


4 of 7 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page