MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 80,552 this week

You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997)

 -  Short  -  7 February 1997 (USA)
3.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.6/10 from 158 users  
Reviews: 6 user

Add a Plot

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb Picks: October

IMDb's editors share the movies and TV shows they are excited to see in October.


User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 905 titles
created 7 months ago
 

Related Items


Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997)

You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997) on IMDb 3.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of You're Still Not Fooling Anybody.

User Polls

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Himself (archive footage)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Short

Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

7 February 1997 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Connections

Edited from Charley Varrick (1973) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Yep, as most sequels: Poor, very poor.........
5 February 2001 | by (Engelen, the Netherlands) – See all my reviews

Well, what can I say about this one.... It's some sort of sequel of the terrific 'Who Do You Think You're Fooling?' the movie that shows that Tarantino "borrowed" stuff from another movie for his debut 'Reservoir Dogs'. It was pretty obvious that QT made a nice replica of 'City on Fire' (although it was only ten minutes he borrowed from the original...)

This movie had to prove that Tarantino borrowed again from other movies for the classic movie Pulp Fiction. This time the evidence is less convincing. Showing that someone's reading Ezekiel 25:17, and say that one is stolen by Tarantino, is in my opinion very poor, because that part is a passage written in the bible !!

Hmmmm, not really convincing evidence, eh ? It goes on and on in this (only 2 minute) movie. Things were you scratch the back of your head and say:" I could collect that evidence for every movie" and yes, that's the feeling I got when I saw this one.

It seems that Mike White (the director) made this one to come back to the attention of the audience, and uses his old concept again. But like all other sequels, this one never comes close to the first movie. You really can say that Mr.White is the one who's fooling the audience this time !

I say, a poor movie that tries to tackle a classic (Pulp Fiction), but misses the target completely !! A zero out of 5 ......


7 of 18 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss You're Still Not Fooling Anybody (1997) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page