In late 1950s New York, Tom Ripley, a young underachiever, is sent to Italy to retrieve a rich and spoiled millionaire playboy, named Dickie Greenleaf. But when the errand fails, Ripley takes extreme measures.
A cab driver finds himself the hostage of an engaging contract killer as he makes his rounds from hit to hit during one night in Los Angeles. He must find a way to save both himself and one last victim.
Rudy Baylor is a jobless young attorney. However, he is also the only hope of an elderly couple whose insurance company will not pay for an operation that could save their son's life. In this judicial drama, Rudy learns to hate corporate America as he falls in love with a battered young married woman. Will he be up to the task? Written by
Steve Richer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The Southwestern Reporter Second citation, 585 S.W.2d 431, given by Rudy Baylor for the case 'Club Ruby v Carmine De Soto' - which was supposed to be controlling regarding the admissibility of the stolen Great Benefit manual as evidence - is a citation to an actual Kentucky Court of Appeals case: 'French Bank of California v. First National Bank of Louisville'. The case, however, did not involve stolen evidence. See more »
When handed a computer printout to read on the stand, Wilfred Keeley played by Roy Scheider opens the printout like a book and finds the data. Closeups show the printout is in landscape mode and couldn't be read as Keeley does. As the reading wasn't challenged by Baylor (Matt Damon) the position of the printout wasn't scripted. See more »
What's the difference between a lawyer and a hooker? A hooker'll stop screwing you when you're dead.
See more »
There is a credit for "Poet in Residence". See more »
Not always realistic, but a highly entertaining story
This film was sort of a comeback for Francis Ford Coppola, considering that he had not really made any films since "The Godfather Part 3", other than "Jack". In this film Matt Damon plays a young lawyer fresh out of law school, who by chance meets up with spitfire paralegal Danny DeVito, and takes on a huge and difficult case. Fully entertaining throughout, although the ending is almost completely unbeleivable, which is the only negative aspect of this film. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys a good courtroom drama, I thought it was one of the better ones that I have seen. I rate it *** out of ****, or maybe even a little higher.
14 of 16 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?