An orphan named Oliver Twist meets a pickpocket on the streets of London. From there, he joins a household of boys who are trained to steal for their master.

Director:

Writers:

(novel),
Reviews

On Disc

at Amazon

Nominated for 1 Primetime Emmy. Another 2 wins & 3 nominations. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
Alex Trench ...
Antoine Byrne ...
Olivia Caffrey ...
Anthony Finigan ...
Mr. Brownlow (as Anthony Finnegan)
Maria Charles ...
...
Eileen Colgan ...
Eilish Moore ...
Cook
Lisa Dwan ...
Agnes
Conor Evans ...
Chief Constable
A.J. Kennedy ...
Police Constable
Jeff O'Toole ...
Hugh (as Jeffrey O'Toole)
Edit

Storyline

Charles Dickens' classical story about the young orphan boy in 1837 England is again re-filmed in grand fashion. Richard Dreyfuss portrays Fagin, the unscrupulous leader of the young pick-pockets Oliver (Alex Trench) initially falls in with after escaping from a sweat shop and going to London to find his relatives. Written by John Sacksteder <jsackste@bellsouth.net>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

Unrated | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

16 November 1997 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:


Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Quotes

The Artful Dodger: What's to happen to the likes of me? Just trying to make a dishonest living for himself.
See more »

Connections

Version of Fagin (1922) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
"Disney-fied" far too much; decent at best
4 September 2004 | by (Denmark) – See all my reviews

Just when you thought Disney had ruined enough classics, they pounce like a predator on the brilliant work of Charles Dickens, Oliver Twist, and turns a great story into a cheap family/children's tale. Now, I haven't read the entire book, but I read much of it when I was younger, and what I remember was definitely much better than this cheap, made-for-TV Disney production. They changed the story very much around, and removed some of the more "inappropriate for younger viewers" details, which pretty much ruins the story, and reduces it to an immature retelling of a great Dickens story. The plot is decent, but it's so damn predictable and dull(not to mention different from the original) that only a child or someone with way too much free time and/or patience could enjoy it. The acting is decent at best, with one or two actors obviously trying to transcend the embarrassing level of acting, but failing miserably due to the awfully written material. The script is poorly written. The characters are badly written and often come off as cliché-ish stereotype versions of the people they're portraying. The dialog is poorly written. The humor is juvenile. Overall the film is a very childish and immature production, which I guess is supposed to represent the target audience. I've said it before and I'll say it again; Hollywood, listen up: a children's movie doesn't necessarily have to be a childish movie. There is a difference, and that difference is most commonly known under the term "level of quality". Even for a TV film this is bad. All in all, a decent Disney production, but if you want a good retelling of the story, look elsewhere. Or, even better, read the book. I hear it's excellent, but I can't remember much of it. I recommend this only to children, and only to children who are ignorant of the works of Dickens. Anyone else should avoid; unless, you have absolutely nothing better to do, you have to kill 90 minutes, and there are no good spots left on the walls to stare at. 5/10


6 of 10 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?