|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Index||16 reviews in total|
Overall this is a pretty good Columbo, in my opinion, though it does
have some glaring weaknesses.
Barry Corbin is very good as the loud husband who gets framed by Shera Danese. Danese turns in her usual performance; she's lovely and interesting but seems to play essentially the same character in every episode.
The criminologist "bad guy" does a pretty sloppy job for a supposed expert -- that may be the biggest plot weakness; it's hard to believe he was that dumb. A long way from CSI.
The other weakness is the ending - the twist is good enough, I suppose, but the scene in which he reveals it is contrived and overplayed.
All in all, a good story. If they'd redone the ending and let the villain be a little more clever it would have been a great one. As it is, it's just good.
Cathleen Calvert wants to leave her millionaire husband Clifford and
set up with lover Patrick Kinsley. However a water-tight prenuptial
agreement means that divorce will leave her with nothing. Killing him
is deemed far too risky and obvious a crime but if only they could get
him out of the way without losing access to his wealth. Luckily for
them, Clifford is being threatened with a major lawsuit from accountant
Howard Seltzer and Cathleen decides that the easiest thing to do would
be to murder Seltzer and frame Clifford. The deed is easy and it looks
like an open and shut case given how much evidence is available (thanks
to the knowledge Kingsley has as a member of the police forensics
team). Problem is, for Lt. Columbo, it just doesn't ring true and he
just keeps digging.
With the long running Columbo formula it is tempting to try and change it and "new" Columbo films have occasionally fallen into the trap of ditching the formula and trying something new it rarely worked. However with this film the writers have successfully varied the formula while still retaining enough of it to avoid losing the elements of the series that make it so successful. It is a bit of a problem that the plot is built on a lot of coincidences and illogical risks but generally the film manages to keep things working so that I just accepted the events. Having said that, it didn't ring true that Kinsley, having left enough forensic evidence to frame the pope, would feel he has to get more involved in the case. Such things aside though the film is an engaging mystery that is fun to watch because we get to see Columbo at work, going after his main suspect as per formula but also having more out there to engage his mind and take him in a different direction. It is a nice touch and, like I said, it allows the film to do what the series normally do while also doing things differently.
Falk works with this well and embraces the chance to show his character working internally with the slightest little clues. He delivers some nice comic touches throughout and, as usual, seems totally comfortable within his own skin. The casting of the two male supports is good. Corbin is a solid presence and he provides the tension with Columbo while Rasche provides the "I'll help you solve this" element of the formula so together they provide the usual stuff but the fact that it is split makes it more interesting. Danese is less convincing but the film doesn't put too much on her. There isn't much support to speak of and generally the main three male actors do well to carry it with good performances.
Overall then a pretty enjoyable Columbo film. Although the change in formula comes with illogical devices and unlikely setups it does generally work and it presents the formula while also changing it. As many of the new Columbo films show, changing the formula is a risky business but here it pulls it off.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
A 1997 Columbo episode which was made to celebrate 25 years of the
detective on television. The plot centres around a woman who conspires
with her lover (who just happens to be part of the police forensics
team that eventually survey the murder scene) to frame her rich husband
for the murder of his business partner who was suing him.
Since Columbo's return to the small screen in 1988, the series has been very hit-and-miss: there have been some episodes which have upheld the decision to bring Columbo back, whilst others merely aggravate and dismay loyal fans of the series with thoughtless and badly conceived changes to the formula.
This particular episode has a strong plot which is executed with the conviction it deserves, but I'm at pains to explain the logic behind putting cat hairs from the murder scene on the back of the person's suit to incriminate him - in a murder scenario, how would they get there; perhaps on a sleeve or on a part of the trousers, but on the back of the suit??
Nevertheless, there are clever aspects to this story: the gradual dismantling of the "frame" with a vital clue and how Columbo initially deduces that the wife and the police forensics expert know each other.
Yes, the episode is haunted with a little predictability: the wedding photos do indicate precisely when the husband acquired cat hair on the back of his suit and yes, they could have trimmed down the last half hour of the movie: it suffers from distinct protractedness because the murderers' plot has all but failed after nearly an hour and the final scene which sees Columbo re-enact how he discovered that the wife and the forensics expert actually knew each other is totally unnecessary and badly staged.
There are some good performances in evidence too: Peter Falk's real-life wife, Shera Danese (who plays the wife who frames her husband) acts well here and here scenes with Columbo are better than you might expect. Also, Barry Corbin as the framed husband perfectly conveys his character's business-like volatility.
Overall, this a distinct "breath of fresh air" for a series which was undeniably ailing with some of its past inferior, badly judged scripts.
I've read lots of comments about this movie, both good and bad, and I must say that I think it is one of the best of the newer Columbo movies. This was actually the first time I'd seen him stumped for the majority of the movie, and it wasn't until shortly before the end that he actually figured it out. Although I love Columbo, the main reason I decided to watch this one was because I loved David Rasche in Sledge Hammer (please make more of those). However, the plot for this one kept me riveted to the couch and not wanting to move. Possibly not as good as many of the classics from the 70s, but definitely better than most of the newer episodes I've seen. Watch it if you get a chance.
Let me say this right off the bat: the two worst actresses in the world are
Kate Capshaw and Shera Danese. Watching Danese's misplaced facial
expressions, hammy acting, arm waving, and screechy voice sucks all the fun
out of this Columbo film. She does absolutely nothing good with the plum
role she's given. Bad director or bad acting? I tend to believe the
Danese's acting aside, this is a pretty enjoyable Columbo film, well-paced and fairly involved. The joy of watching Columbo is wondering if he already knows who the killer is; in the 1970s films, you could never tell, and that was part of the fun. That sense of enigma is lost in these later films, especially in this one, where he doesn't realize it until well into the film. No matter what else he does, this is Peter Falk's signature role, and he has been a lucky actor for not getting typecast, given his variety of roles over the years.
All in all, I recommend this film as a worthy contributor to the Columbo legacy.
I liked watching this Columbo movie. It follows the usual formula but
has a story with some twists to it, in which 2 lovers are trying to
frame the wife's husband for a murder in order to get the husband out
of the way. The man and murderer also happens to work for the police as
a forensics expert and therefore starts to work directly with Lt.
Columbo on the case. At first he really seriously doesn't suspect him
(which is almost un-Columbo like) and it isn't until halve way through
that the good old lieutenant starts to figure out the truth.
It's a nice concept, that is also rather well written, though the movie gets a bit weaker as the movie progresses and it starts to drag a bit with its concept. Also the seemingly 'perfect' plan seems actually more and more stupendous and not thought out well enough. It has too many holes and clues in it for Lt. Columbo to figure that something fishy is going on here. So even though it's well written and original within its usual framework, it just isn't the most watertight script, plot-wise.
What also mostly makes this movie such a fine and fun Columbo movie to watch is its nice comedy. There some real fine and subtle comedy within this movie, which made me enjoy this movie even more than the usual average Columbo movie entry.
It was the last movie Vincent McEveety directed for the Columbo series. He directed a total of 7 Columbo movies in the '90's. All of them are special Columbo movie entries in their own way and they are each original. I think this is why he got asked so many times back to direct another Columbo movie. No, not all of his Columbo movies work out but at least you can always say that it's different than usual, which already is a big thing for a Columbo movie. Fore lets face it, in essence every Columbo movie is of course the same.
The cast was also good. Normally the later Columbo movies don't have a too good or impressive cast but in this movie all actors do a good job. Even though the movie doesn't feature the biggest names in the business this really doesn't harm this Columbo entry in the way it had harmed some of the other later Columbo movies. Even Shera Danese is good in this one. Danese at the time (and still is) married to Peter Falk, which had landed her some roles in more than a few Columbo movies. Normally she isn't much good but in this movie she plays her role simply well.
A Columbo movie I simply enjoyed watching, despite its plot flaws and problems.
In addition to slow-to-unravel plots and Columbo's simultaneously folksy
irritating (to suspects) manner, many episodes in the Columbo saga also
feature colorful prime suspects played by felicitously chosen actors.
Often, a delightful chemistry develops between Columbo and his
Once again, great chemistry! Barry Corbin delivers as a brawling, coarse, mince-few-words business tycoon with no patience for irritations.
Columbo is a unique character who is fun to watch. However, during "A Trace of Murder" the fun was coupled with a great plot. It is my favorite and probably the only one that provided its "fun" content due to the character. As usual, but also surprised many of us with a fresh, brilliant story line. Although I have always enjoyed Columbo, "A Trace of Murder" is the only one that comes to mind in detail when discussing the series with others. Let's have more work of that quality... and soon!
This Columbo-episode must be one of the best ever. The plot is simple:
Cathleen Calvert (played by Shera Danese, Peter Falk's real-time wife!)
a rich husband, Clifford (played by Barry Corbin), but she has also a
Patrick Kinsley (played by David Rasche). To get rid of her husband,
Cathleen figures out a great plan: they make him responsible for a murder.
All evidence leads Columbo to him. Will Clifford ever be free or was the
plan perfect? Watch the movie to figure it out!
I loved the plot: it was interesting. It was fun to watch Barry Corbin as Clifford, his character was funny. Shera Danese again in a Columbo-movie, but this is good: she can act, whatever character is needed. Peter Falk as Columbo is perfect as always.
I can recommend this movie for everybody looking for a good mystery.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
It is generally said (and I feel unfairly) that all of the Columbo
episodes that were made from the late 1980s to the last few years were
inferior to the earlier ones. The Levinson - Link formula for the
Lieutenant was maintained in these later episodes, but (unless one
likes to totally repeat oneself) new tricks were done in the plots. In
one concerning a modern painter with a "Matisse" style reputation, as
Peter Falk talked to the artist the camera changed into perspective
mirroring the artist's style of painting. I happened to think that was
Nothing so complicated here. Instead it was the biggest threat to Columbo's investigation from the police side of it since Richard Kiley (in an early episode) played the Police Commissioner who murdered his wife. Here the villain is David Rasche (a good choice - he and Dabney Coleman had to wait for these late episodes to finally rise or fall to the occasion as guest villain). Rasch is a pathologist with the L.A. Police who has been romancing Shera Denese (Mrs. Falk in real life), who is married to Barry Corbin, a multi-millionaire scoundrel.
It is Corbin that makes me enjoy this episode. It is like the negative side of his go-getting military millionaire Maurice Minnifield in NORTHERN EXPOSURE. But Maurice, for all his flaws, was a decent fellow, and Alaska is the last frontier (in many respects) for American capitalism. He was a booster of the state. Not so Corbin's "Clifford Calvert". He is a financial success, but in the tradition of Jay Gould or Charles Ponzi or Charles Keating. Gordon Gecko would have approved of him. He has swindled his way to a grand life style, and has been clever enough to make it nearly foolproof. In fact he is so rich that he can let everything hang out - not only his stout belly, but his real enjoyment of the good life.
There are only two things that threaten this vulgarian. Franklin Cover is one of the suckers who fell for Corbin's schemes, and has brought a shareholders suit. To Corbin this is an annoyance (he knows Cover and the two never have gotten along). The other thing is that his trophy wife loathes him, and wants out of the marriage. But Corbin was as smart with her as he was with stockholders - she had to sign a prenuptial agreement that leaves her nothing if she leaves or divorces him. But if he is (shall we say) put out of the way by the State of California with a life sentence for murder, well she can then enjoy his millions without him.
Rasche is the perfect match for Denese. He knows how to plant the right clues to catch Corbin. Together they murder Cover, and then frame the hapless swindler for the killing. It is one of the few times a scoundrel is made sympathetic by worse scoundrels.
Enter our favorite methodical Lieutenant. He sees the forensic reports and has seen the homicide scenes. He has also met Rasche (he has to, as the man is the head forensics at the scene of the crime), Corbin, and Denese. Yeah, it looks like a good case against Corbin, but he insists he was at a big dinner party too far from the scene of the crime to have committed it.
I won't spoil the fun about how Columbo saves the skin of the swindler. It's a matter of etiquette in the end. But the best is how Corbin while talking to Columbo learns they share a taste for cigars...and lectures him on the only civilized way of smoking a fine cigar. At the end a grateful Corbin gives a gift to Columbo on this point - with dubious results for the Lieutenant.
|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Plot summary||Ratings||External reviews|
|Plot keywords||Main details||Your user reviews|
|Your vote history|