7.8/10
11,187
90 user 19 critic

12 Angry Men (1997)

PG-13 | | Crime, Drama | TV Movie 17 August 1997
Twelve men must decide the fate of one when one juror objects to the jury's decision.

Director:

Writer:

(teleplay)
Reviews
Popularity
3,016 ( 86)

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

Won 1 Golden Globe. Another 6 wins & 22 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Complete credited cast:
...
Foreman
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Edit

Storyline

Made for cable television remake of the 1957 classic about twelve jurors quick to condemn a Latino youth on trial for murdering his father before reviewing the evidence. Juror #8 holds out with a verdict of not guilty, thus setting the stage for arguments and reasons why or why not the boy may be guilty. Written by Humberto Amador

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

jury | trial | remake | guilty | not guilty | See All (69) »

Genres:

Crime | Drama

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

17 August 1997 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Douze hommes en colère  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

(Technicolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Filmed in sequence. See more »

Goofs

After it starts raining, and they take a break, Juror #7 picks up a piece of wadded up paper twice between shots. See more »

Quotes

Juror #8: Ever since we've walked into this room, you've acted like a self-appointed public avenger!
Juror #3: Shut up...
Juror #8: You want the boy to die for your own personal reasons, not because of the facts!
[Juror #3 tries to get his hands on Juror #8, but some other jurors hold him back]
Juror #8: You're a sadist!
Juror #3: I'll kill ya!
Juror #8: You don't really mean you'll kill me, do you?
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Behind the Rules of Engagement (2000) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Gives a whole new meaning to the word `remake'
30 January 2004 | by (the Draconian Swamp of Unholy Souls) – See all my reviews

This TV-movie is truly remarkable. It's a remake of an undeniable classic, and that word usually brings tears to your eyes. Remakes normally are a lame excuse used by uninspired directors to make more money out of a good idea. You know the drill of the average remake: bigger, louder and as less tribute to the original as possible. William Friedkin's take on 12 Angry Men is the exact opposite of all this. It's a modest re-telling of the story but obviously made with endless amounts of professionalism and respect towards the original. Taken up to an even higher level by on of the best ensemble casts of the nineties! All members of the jury are familiar faces and some of them give away the best performances in their entire career. The acting level of the cast during some of the intense discussions and debates almost burns holes in the screens…it's that perfect. A very special word of respect and worship goes out to Jack Lemmon, Hume Cronym and George C. Scott. These 3 late legends of the big screen kept on giving amazing performances till they sadly passed away. May their souls rest in piece, cinema will never forget them. Of course, I can't give this version the honor of being better than the original masterpiece starring Henry Fonda, but nevertheless it's an intense and fascinating courtroom drama that'll leave no soul unharmed. Naturally, one could ask the question if it was really necessary to create an update of 12 Angry Men…the answer to that would be ‘no' of course, but what the heck. Almost every remake, sequel or spin-off is unnecessary, but that doesn't mean they can't be enjoyable.


70 of 91 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?