| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Index | 12 reviews in total |
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Didn't mind it, 12 January 2007
![]()
Author:
tootster from Australia
I watched this film on Cable TV at the Sunshine Coast when my partner
and I were on holidays last week. It was in the apartments we were
staying at.
Overall, I love Lou Diamond Phillips and Mia Sara any-ways. Also
Charles Dance, I have seen him in Alien 3 and other films..
I thought the producer / director were budget smart in making the film.
Only picking 3 actors and having them on the credits (only) is somewhat
clever. Plus 1 house, weapons and simplistic costumes and props.
I thought it was pretty good. As it had some suspenseful moments. Plus
it focused on observational behaviour. Like what is coming next? What
do we do next in this house! The camera and acting made it feel to the
audience that "what would you do in a situation like this?" Be smart,
and smarter...
I thought there were some techniques used in the cameras and scenes
where they were quite labouring, just to give the viewer an idea or
thought of what the actors were doing next. I think with some movies I
have watched in the past, are similar to some styles portrayed from
veteran film-makers. At least I think they tried to.
Overall 6 out of 10.
Cheers
3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Strange movie, 21 December 2001
Author:
Alex-372 from The Hague, The Netherlands
This is one strange movie, because it has two great names writing and directing it, Kathryn Bigelow (Near Dark) and Eric Red (The Hitcher). It's almost as if some one said: how can we make the leanest, most effective thriller? This is a movie with literally only three actors (3), no extras and the carpenters and assistant carpenters outnumber them more than 2 to 1. As well, this movie, even though it is supposedly located somewhere in "The Carolinas", is shot on location in Latvia (maybe that's why they only flew over 3 actors). This shack could have been anywhere, though, they never needed to leave Hollywood. The major problem with this movie is that the theme has been done to death (hapless traveller drives through the country side, a car breaking down and is scooped up by the locals - where have we seen that before? Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Hills Have Eyes, Deliverance, Children Of The Corn...). Anyway, the actors do what they can and there are some suspenseful moments, but they're not sustained until the end of the movie. Cliches abound.
2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
Eventually sinks under it's own weight..., 14 August 1999
![]()
Author:
Adec
Despite (or perhaps because of) high expectations Undertow started off as
an
interesting thriller but had trouble sustaining it's (relatively short)
length and just didn't seem to have the pace or intensity required to
carry
it to it's end successfully.
Being a fan of much of writer/director Eric Red's previous work, most
notably as a writer of such fine films as The Hitcher, Near dark and Blue
Steel (the last two in combination with his writing partner here, Kathryn
Bigelow) I was expecting a taut, suspenseful film. However while the film
didn't match up to these earlier works it definitely wasn't a total waste,
and on a smaller scale was a quite entertaining, if somewhat limited,
experience.
Overall the acting from the three leads was quite good, with Dance's
performance especially being distinctly well handled without relying on
over
the top histrionics, while Phillips and Sara both playing their less
flashy
parts solidly enough. Eric Red handles the direction well for the most
part
but is perhaps, if anything, a little too meandering at times in what
ultimately unfolds more like a play than a film.
Probably the film's biggest fault is that much like Red's direction, the
film itself is just a little too understated for the most part, and then,
as
is often the case with films of this nature, it tends to go from
believability to stretching credibility a tad too far just for the sake of
theatrics at the end, the result of which ultimately just diminishes the
overall impact of what has come before.
Overall Undertow is a solid, if unremarkable thriller that definitely has
it's moments, it's just that not all of those moments are as good as they
could have been.
One man's opinion.
7/10
1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Disappointing! Could have been done a lot better!, 4 October 2006
![]()
Author:
NoName1989 from Belgium
I watched this film, because I knew there were only three actors in it. That seemed very special to me. The story also seemed quite interesting to me. Not that the story is original, but you can make very good movies out of stories like that. But I was disappointed when I saw it. The direction was not that good and the acting of Lou Diamond Philips was not so good and sometimes a bit irritating. Luckily there are Charles Dance and Mia Sara, that do quite well. The film is quite exciting, but when it nears the end it deteriorates. If the budget would have been bigger, they could have done the cinematography much better and then this would be a much better film. The end could also have been done a little better. A missed opportunity.
2 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Survivalist Activity Getting Through This One., 12 July 2005
Author:
tfrizzell from United States
A man's (Lou Diamond Phillips) car breaks down in the middle of nowhere and he finds a cabin deep in the woods. Unwittingly Phillips walks into a volatile situation with a psychotic nut-job (Charles Dance) and his bewildered and frightened young wife (Mia Sara). Soon the typical situations take place as Phillips seems to be in a struggle to survive and of course help Sara escape her mad husband. And naturally Phillips and Sara begin to develop deep romantic feelings for one another. Painful killer of a movie that feels like it was just thrown together with minimal resources and seemingly no planning. Phillips, who is one of those somewhat talented performers who always seems to find himself in terrible cinematic vehicles, looks tired and bored throughout. Unfortunately, he is not as tired and bored as the audience is sure to be. Turkey (0 stars out of 5).
1 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Umm...no, 11 March 2002
Author:
sponj
But i would watch it again. That doesn't make any bit of sense does it. This film honestly does begin interesting. It ends in way crazy confusion in an unbelievable sequence of events. Things happen in this film that aren't properly explained. Is willie in LOVE with her husband. Does this scraggly mountain mad really not know that Lou Diamond is hip dipping with his wife? What begins as a thrilling story with a love triangle to accent, becomes a stupid peice of crap movie.
1 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
oh dear, 30 December 2005
![]()
Author:
youngpowell from Australia
Oh dear, what a horrid movie.
The production was so cheap and nasty... Remember the shot from "the
Natural", where the lightning hits the tree (leaving a glowing stump)
that Roy Hobbs makes a bat from?? Well the producers of this movie used
that same scene to prefix a scene where a tree branch slammed into the
house.
I wonder if they paid to use the footage from The Natural, or did they
just hope that no-one who would watch the film would pick it up ?
Then at the end where they were getting trying to get away in the
truck. Such over-acting in the cabin.
A really bad film, a really bad film.
1 out of 5 people found the following review useful:
Deliverance meets Dead Calm ... but ends up just plain dead, 30 December 2005
![]()
Author:
vrtu050 from Australia
As a premise, this backwoods version of the Dead Calm storyline had
promise.
However, director Eric Red's inability to render a convincing hurricane
leads to a deluge of continuity and lighting errors.
Ultimately, the viewer is more spellbound by the bizarre weather
effects than the intended storyline. Intermittent spates of ham-fisted
over-direction are similarly distracting.
Charles Dance, doing an 'inbred backwoods hardass' schtick, does his
best to save the movie. But ultimately, Undertow squeals like a pig ...
and has more ham to boot.
1 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
dull and contrived, 27 February 2004
![]()
Author:
chrissage from SP, Brazil
just below the surface lies what? a simply awful movie is what.
as other viewers have justifiably commented, the storm sequences are just
plain ridiculous. chopping already sodden firewood in the pouring rain?
now
that's smart. menace? foreboding? sexual tension? for those read dull &
contrived, dull & contrived and dull & overly contrived.
i want to say thank god for mia sara's shower scene but in retrospect i
think the producers of the film, having seen the completed mess realised
that they had to put something in to make it half way worthwhile at all.
so
it just becomes yet another contrivance.
do yourself a favour and give this a miss.
1 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Love that phony hurricane!, 22 March 2002
![]()
Author:
biker45 from Florida
I sat through this turkey because I hadn't seen it before, and because the premise sounded like it had potential. It was mildly entertaining until the hurricane sequence. At the height of the storm, the wind is strong enough to blow windows out of the house, yet the trees in the background are perfectly upright and not a leaf is moving! In fact, when the characters move outside the house, bright sunlight is visible illuminating the treetops. At that point, whatever credence the filmmakers had developed evaporated faster than the highly localized rain in their film. Too bad all hurricanes aren't like this one, it would surely help our homeowners insurance rates here in the Sunshine State.
| Page 1 of 2: | [1] [2] |
| Plot summary | Ratings | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |