To Love, Honor and Deceive (TV Movie 1996) Poster

(1996 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Mrs. Carpenter is a Force of Nature
lavatch6 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
In most films like "To Love, Honor and Deceive" (a.k.a., "The Protected Wife"), the opening scene includes a disclaimer about how the movie is based on a true story. But this one is so far-fetched that the filmmakers don't even bother trying to add this touch of realism.

The focus of the film is on a character who is clearly a force of nature: Mrs. Sydney Carpenter. Upon meeting her for the first time, the sleazy criminal named Bennett says, "this is a woman not to be underestimated." Indeed, Mrs. Carpenter will stop at nothing from learning the truth about her liar of husband and the whereabouts of her little boy Adam.

The husband, Matthew, who has some charm and genuine affection for his son, has led a double life of good family man versus smuggler and bigamist. Mrs. Carpenter is left holding the bag when Matthew and Adam appear to have drowned in a storm. But the quick-thinking Sydney realizes that something is amiss when she learns that the husband failed to take the radio along with him. Something is fishy, and it's not the sharks that are supposed to have consumed Matthew Carpenter and little Adam.

Mrs. Carpenter always has her radar antenna in working order. She detects lies in her best friend and realizes that the friend had an affair with Adam. She also smells a rat in the careerist FBI agent who is not coming clean with her. Of course, the police are incompetent, especially the pretty boy, Detective Jim Sanders, who becomes Sydney's lover in the course of the investigation.

All of these juicy plot details are not realized to the full because of the bargain basement dialogue and wooden performances. The most outlandish scene is in the courtroom where Mrs. Carpenter is miraculously able to get an instant trial alleging malfeasance by the FBI agent. But during the trial, her hotshot attorney does not even cross-examine the perp!

While this was, for the most part, an entertaining drama, it lacked tension and effective pacing to truly evoke interest and suspense.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
deceit can be so entertaining !
larrerv27 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This movie really starts slow,but right when you are ready to give up on it,it starts moving at really good pace.The acting is much better than most made for television movies and the plot is full of twist and turns.Most of the cast does a great job,especially the female lead.Thomas Gibson surprisingly enough makes a great creepy husband and of course thinks only of his own diabolical self.James Wilder manages to mug his way through in his usual,look at me brooding,style of acting.It always amazes me that these people fall in and out of love in an hour and half,I guess they are strapped for time.Not a perfect movie but very entertaining,very enjoyable.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did not finish
banderson_10015 October 2021
Unbelievable story, really bad acting ... so incredibly unbelievable. I really didn't care what happened. Two good actors, Rosalind chao and Thomas Gibson. The FBI agent was just terrible, I have seen him in other roles where he did a better job, I did not take him seriously as a FBI agent. Don't waste your time.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Frustrating stew of credibility problems
synonym4shedog26 February 2010
Not sure what I expected, but in many ways this was a disappointment of a thriller. The protagonist's (Vanessa Marcil) attitude, her intent from the very beginning to get her son back (but not the husband), had me confused. A little back story of marital problems would have been most welcome -- especially since the actor portraying the husband (Thomas Gibson) acted rings around the official police detective love interest (James Wilder).

The whole FBI subplot thing -- including the courtroom scenes -- had no credibility at all, and Agent Lassiter (Leland Orser) was such a chore to watch that at one point I considered just turning the blame thing off. And the wife's best friend (Rosalind Chao) was never even given the dignity of a name.

Maybe some other viewers will be satisfied with the ending. I do not feel that much of a job was done knitting up plot lines. I was left thinking, "Wait, is that all there is? What about A and B and C?"
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Some One Has No Clue...
willowknightblade5 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The writer has no clue about courtrooms, or the FBI. It was so majorly disappointing. It is hard to follow along there is so little continuity.

Mrs Carpenter (Vanessa Marcil) is confusing. From the start we are to believe she is stupidly in love with her husband. After the accident she shows very little care for him. If she had no clue about his past why does she show so much apathy toward him? I understand wanting to save your son, but not a moments thought to rescuing him.

Matthew (Thomas Gibson) is the only thing good about this movie. Rosalind Chow is good as well. The detective is droll, the FBI agent is painful to watch, the plot holes are dangerous, and the end is predictable. With all of the stuff that is left undone it is just frustrating.

I left two stars for Gibson and Chow's sake.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
well... not great!
asage1930 March 2020
There are some good actors in this. I just wish the actress chosen for the heroine were a better actress. The plot isn't bad, but the writing ain't great. The interpersonal scenes, such as between the heroine and the cop, the fbi guy and his boss... I zipped right through those, because they drag it down. The pacing is awkward, the acting is mostly unconvincing. I'm thinking that since it's a tv movie, and it's the nineties, maybe it was aimed at soap-opera fans. It's too bad, 'cause it's not a bad story, and there is some good acting (Rosalind Chao comes to mind), but they're doing the best they can with what they have to work with.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Big Surprise
whpratt118 October 2006
This story starts out very calm and quiet in a average American town with a married woman, Vanessa Marcel,(Sydney Carpenter),"Storm Watch",'02, who is offered a career in the film business, which she had prior experiences. However, she loves her husband, Thomas Gibson,(Matthew Carpenter),"Come Away Home",'05 and her little son and decides to stay home and be a good mother and wife. Matthew Carpenter does very little communicating with his wife and they do manage to sleep in the same bed and things do happen, once-in-awhile. It is at this point that I begin to wonder just what is going to make this film interesting and is it going to be a good mystery. As this film progressed further, I was very much in for a Big Surprise and never stopped looking at the screen. Vanessa Marcel all of a sudden appears are a very charming young woman who has an outstanding female figure and is full of life and determined to find out some very dark problems in her marriage. You will enjoy this film and it will keep you guessing right to the very end.
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Basic story line
captainronbailey30 October 2021
Don't get me wrong. If you are a fan of Lifetime (bore time) movies you will enjoy this one. Please feed the actresses before they waste away! The beautiful people rule in this film.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Great Movie!!!
Jeremiah_1611 August 2002
This movie was a great movie , great plot , and even though the actors weren't that famous they did a good job acting. It is truely too bad that this movie didn't recieve the recognition that it truely deserved because this is a good movie . I recomend this movie to everyone , no matter what your type of movie you prefer because this movie will make your day .

Jeremy
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Shifting emotions
alicesmith6724 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I started out thinking this was going to be suspense filled and full of heart wrenching moments. However, the main character (Vanessa Marcil) seemed to go from being a loving wife who adored her husband to a woman that could care less he was gone... Even before she knew of hs deceit. She quickly jumped into a relationship with the detective. Like what?!?! She DID NOT do well to portray a mother who's son was missing/dead. There was no raw emotion to be seen anywhere. The only good acting came from Thomas Gibson as Matthew Carpenter. His acting showed feeling towards his son. You could imagine the relationship. Sadly, the writer did not see the benefit to having more scenes with Thomas Gibson. Had they done, then there may have been more realism to the story line.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The protected Wife
wwjdjul23 January 2020
Was a really good movie and I would watch it again because it was just that good I never got board and I always kept me guessing
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed