MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 4,685 this week

Poldark (1996)

TV Movie  -   -  Drama | History  -  3 October 1996 (UK)
5.8
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.8/10 from 119 users  
Reviews: 4 user

Add a Plot

Director:

Writer:

(novel)
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 3058 titles
created 25 Aug 2011
 
a list of 485 titles
created 07 Apr 2012
 
a list of 184 titles
created 13 Jun 2012
 
a list of 100 titles
created 26 Jul 2012
 
a list of 125 titles
created 11 Dec 2012
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Poldark (TV Movie 1996)

Poldark (TV Movie 1996) on IMDb 5.8/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Poldark.

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
John Bowe ...
Mel Martin ...
Michael Attwell ...
...
...
...
Stephen Cravenson
...
Jane Gimlet
Sarah Carpenter ...
Lady Harriet
...
Ben Carter
...
Cuby Trevanion
James Saxon ...
...
Lord Edward Fitzmaurice
...
Fiona Victory ...
Patrick Pearson ...
Canning
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama | History

Edit

Details

Country:

Release Date:

3 October 1996 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

Poldark  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.66 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The yellow gown worn by Fiona Victory (Caroline Enys) at the London ball is the same costume worn to dinner by Tanya Samuel in The Regency House Party (2004), and by a guest at the Duchess of Richmond's ball in Vanity Fair (1998). See more »

Connections

Referenced in The Cult of...: Poldark (2008) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Mixed Reviews
15 December 2003 | by (Winchester, England) – See all my reviews

The old Poldark afficiandos regard this as a blasphemy. But I've noticed some reviews on Amazon that are a little less anorak and a little more objective, some of which are fairly favourable, one or two very much so. On its own terms it does have flaws. The book on which it is based is more an old man's ruminations than a story and any adaptation was going to run into problems. That said, the cast is great (the much-missed originals might well have floundered with their mannered performances, okay in the seventies but ... well ...), the locations and design are quite stunning and the story sort of lopes along a bit erratically but there are some good scenes. Laxton directs with finesse, in my view, and the script is more elegantly poetic than I think its audience was expecting. It does end rather suddenly but this was probably meant as a pilot to a series. On reflection, the stories are resolved, in a way, but leave something to the viewer to work out. Probably far too ambitious considering its natural constituency and in the end, possibly a compromise between something new and pandering to the old. It couldn't win. But it's actually a good piece of work. Congratulations all round.


6 of 11 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Any plans for a follow-up? elfboy4ever
Discuss Poldark (1996) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?