| Index | 3 reviews in total |
6 out of 9 people found the following review useful:
Almost Ruined By Its Post Modern Art House Values, 25 January 2005
![]()
Author:
Theo Robertson from Isle Of Bute, Scotland
As I said in my review of LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL I am not a fan of holocaust
movies and find them to be consistently over rewarded at film festivals
. I also find them to be a poor subject for a movie for several reasons
not least because how can you successfully translate so much human
suffering into a movie ? The answer is you can't . But MY MOTHER'S
COURAGE ( As it is known in Britain ) is a lot going for it not least
because it doesn't go in for a sweeping spectacular scope in order to
tell a story . This another problem with the holocaust genre - the
narrative often starts before the Second World War with smiling Jewish
families , the Nazis invade Eastern Europe ( 1939 in the case of Poland
. 1941 in the rest of the region ) the families are deported and the
story continues until liberation in 1945 giving little time to
concentrate on detail . This movie is different since the main part of
the running time revolves around a train journey , and it's little
details like toilet facilities on the train that make MY MOTHER'S
COURAGE such a human tale of suffering , narrative wise this film
doesn't really concern itself with millions upon millions of murders by
the Hitler regime over a period of years , it's more concerned with a
day in the life of Nazi victims who are going to end up in one of their
death camps hence we've got a human story that humanity can relate to
more . I also wish to stay something that may possibly make me
unpopular and that is the way some of the Nazis are portrayed as being
decent human beings . No don't pick me up wrong , I'm not sticking up
for Nazism but scene where Elsa sits in the train carriage with the
German officer towards the end of the film is unique as is Elsa's
monologue towards the officer
Have you worked it out yet ? I found MY MOTHER'S COURAGE beautiful ,
haunting and touching , far more so than say SCHINDLER'S LIST and yet I
have only awarded it four out of ten ! That's because the director
Michael Verhoeven has made it into an inaccesible self referential
pretentious art house movie of the worst kind . The story starts off
with the real life George Tabori ( Son of Elsa ) addressing the
audience then walking into a film studio where this production is being
made and talking with Verhoeven and the cast . I have no idea what the
point of all this is but it fails to work . We also have to endure
ridiculous scenes where Tabori walks into the narrative and talks
addresses the audience and says " Good morning " to the Nazi guards ! I
wouldn't say this totally failed attempt to out do Lars Von Triers in a
bizarre post modernist contest totally ruins the movie but it comes
very , very close indeed and the story would have worked much better
without this ridiculous gimmick
Confusing, bizarre beginning puts you off, 11 August 2008
![]()
Author:
debo-mills from Toronto, Canada
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
As the other reviewer says, the bizarre and confusing beginning to this
film almost put me off sticking with it: I couldn't figure out what was
going on when the narrator talked both to the modern girl passing by in
Budapest and the older woman who used to be his neighbor, and action in
the story was stopped while he pointed out details in Nazi costume,
etc. This merging of the past and present, and actors playing
themselves playing an historical character (!) added nothing to the
film except confusion.
Once this nonsense is over, however, things proceed in a regular
fashion as the narrator's mother is arrested while walking the street,
herded onto a train bound for Auschwitz, and then successfully
confronts the Nazi commander and is allowed to return home.
Now I love Pauline Collins, and she is a fine actress, but I felt she
was miscast here, maybe she is just too much of an English icon for me
to believe her as a Jewish Hungarian. And sorry, but what "courage" did
she exhibit? She meekly went along with the other deportees even though
she had a "Red Cross Exemption", didn't offer the thirsty girl one of
the plums in her purse (that bugged me!), and only spoke to the Nazi
officer because her neighbor dragged her bodily across the floor and
shoved her out the door in front of him. If the neighbor hadn't done
that she would have got on the train with the others without a word.
And why didn't she mention the girl who had been captured by mistake?
She returned home seemingly without a thought for those left behind. I
realize that we are viewing the film with hindsight as to what fate
awaited the deportees, which Elsa didn't have and that as far as she
was aware the others were just being sent off to another country, and
perhaps in the book there is some mention of her feelings about the
others she left behind, but in the film she comes across as meek,
somewhat selfish, and driven more by naiveté than courage when
confronting the officer.
This film left me with the thought "Is that it?"
3 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
A different Holocaust film, 8 December 1998
![]()
Author:
Michael Fleischhacker from United States
Based on the semi-biographical writing of George Tabori, inspired by his mother, "My Mother's Courage" offers one of the more surrealistic views of the Holocaust I have ever seen. It is an excellent follow-up to "The Nasty Girl."
| Plot summary | Ratings | Awards |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Plot keywords |
| Main details | Your user reviews | Your vote history |