Reviews & Ratings for
Dreammaster: The Erotic Invader More at IMDbPro »

5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Lisa Boyle, 30 June 2001
Author: rocketbook from California

It's no Academy Award winner, but then no one watches the Academy Awards hoping to see Lisa Boyle tied to a bed in a girl-girl scene. Terrible dialogue and great scenery make this movie a decent rental for any Lisa Boyle fan.

1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:
Not bad, 4 July 1999

Author: Steve Donnachie (steve.donnachie@gte.net) from Mass

Aside from the sex it has a cool story. I loved watching Lisa Boyle. But anyways this film did need some better acting. I mean if a women that was trying to get into your nightmares and dreams what would you do. I wouldn't turn to people for help Anyways the best part I liked is when Grant thinks that he is having sex with Septemeber he is acutlly having sex with Devoia.

If you want hot soft-core sex, then this is the flick for you, 21 January 2007

Author: baseballnut570-1 from United States

This otherwise awful movie has four redeeming features, the four lengthy and realistically presented love scenes involving extremely lovely actresses. As soft-core porn goes, this is probably as Hot as it can get. The rating of 7 applies only to the movie's position within the category of late night Blue movies.

Nothing else about the plot or its presentation is the least bit entertaining, which is too bad, since the original concept of entering and influencing the dreams of others is pretty cool--(See Dreamscape with Dennis Quaid) I would say that the problems stem from the budget, after shooting all the simulated intercourse, there must have been insufficient money to do more than one take of all the bad dialog.

Patricia Skeriotis, is brilliant has she a fan club?, 9 May 2002
Author: maurice_richards

Patricia Skeriotis is the only reason I watched this film she was brilliant as Devora. I am now a fan and wondered if she has got a fan club? The film is about a college lecturer who experiments with his students while they are asleep and the dreams that are induce and the lovely Miss Skeriotis enters their dreams

1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
The Name Says It All, 6 April 1999

Author: Theodore W. Atkinson (tatkinso@rssm.com) from Washington, D.C.

An amusingly bad mix of post-Freudian psychology, sleep science, bedeviled women, and naked co-eds. This is a classic adult thriller, meaning that it is not thrilling and is really meant for frustrated teenagers. The acting is periodically horrible, but usually rises to the level of being just awful. The plot (about four students and a professor who conquer their sexual fears while lucid dreaming but--surprise!--meet a mysterious devil-woman in their dreams and must team up to defeat her) is intriguing in the let's-slow-down-and-look-at-the-overturned-tractor-trailer sort of way. Standard pay-TV after-dark fare.

0 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
How Dumb, 22 August 1999
Author: JennLynn from Asheville

Movies with a good plot are worth watching, even if there is sex (I mean, it is part of life!). But the plot in this was the worst. There are good movies, and there are bad. Talk about the movie to sit near the throne of bad movies (not on it, some are worse)...

Add another review

Related Links