7.2/10
702
9 user 2 critic

Crime of the Century (1996)

PG-13 | | Crime, Drama | TV Movie 14 September 1996
In 1932, the nation was shocked when the 14-month-old son of Charles Lindberg was kidnapped, held for ransom, and murdered. Two years later, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was arrested, convicted,... See full summary »

Director:

Writers:

(book), (teleplay)
Reviews
Nominated for 4 Golden Globes. Another 8 nominations. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
Lt. James Finn
...
...
Ellis Parker
...
...
...
Lt. Gus Kramer
...
Commissioner ORyan
...
Albert Osborn Sr.
...
Sgt. Wallace
...
Lloyd Fisher
Scott N. Stevens ...
Edit

Storyline

In 1932, the nation was shocked when the 14-month-old son of Charles Lindberg was kidnapped, held for ransom, and murdered. Two years later, Bruno Richard Hauptmann was arrested, convicted, and executed. This film dramatizes the investigation against Hauptmann, the trial, and the execution, painting a picture of a corrupt police force under pressure to finger a killer framing an innocent man by manufacturing evidence, paying-off and blackmailing witnesses, and covering up exculpatory evidence. Written by Steve Derby <sderby@sdeco.com>

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

The most famous kidnapping in history claimed more than one victim.

Genres:

Crime | Drama

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for some intense thematic elements, including an execution scene | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

14 September 1996 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

A Lindbergh-bébi elrablása  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

|

Color:

| (Eastmancolor)

Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The character, Col. H. Norman Schwarzkopf played here by J.T. Walsh, was the father of Norman Schwarzkopf of Desert Storm fame. See more »

Connections

Version of The Lindbergh Kidnapping Case (1976) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Shameless
7 June 2002 | by See all my reviews

This is a pretty shameless piece of film-making. There is absolutely no hard evidence to support the film's flat claim that Bruno Hauptmann was entirely innocent, and most accounts of the Lindbergh kidnapping case, even those which cast doubt on his conviction, suggest that he was an arrogant, boorish man, not the kindhearted saint presented here. It's as unscrupulously manipulative as Ludovic Kennedy's original book, which has the temerity, in a work of non-fiction, to tell us what people were thinking about - and more than 60 years ago at that. There is, similarly, no back-up offered for the vilification of several of those responsible for Hauptmann's conviction. There are plenty of reasons to view the case with alarm, and to believe that Hauptmann was the victim of a miscarriage of justice (which doesn't necessarily mean he was innocent). To present so biased and distorted an account of the case does no good to the cause of getting at the facts. Stick with 1976's "The Lindbergh Kidnapping Case", which sustains a neutral viewpoint - and is far more disturbing.


8 of 17 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?