13 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :- Black comedy near its best, 17 July 2004
Author:
BornJaded (BornJaded@aol.com) from United States
Why has 'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' not developed a cult following?
I have some theories, but this is certainly a film that should have
found a larger audience at some point.
This is pitch black British comedy near its best, reminiscent of both
Hitchcock and 'A Clockwork Orange' -- its three-part structure is
similar to that of 'A Clockwork Orange,' given that the protagonist is
free, then confined, then free again to illustrate the vanity of
"rehabilitation" where it concerns psychopaths, and we even hear
excerpts from Purcell's Funeral Music for Queen Mary, which Wendy
Carlos incorporated into her electronic score for 'Clockwork.' Whether
'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' is paying homage or borrowing, the
movie itself is a highly individual work that should please anyone with
a fondness for Orwell or Ealing.
Hugh O'Conor, with his wide-eyed gift for simulating innocence, is an
ideal selection for the role of Graham Young, the real-life poisoner of
the British village of Bovingdon, who slowly poisoned his stepmother to
death with antimony sulfide, finishing the job with thallium. Cursed
with a banal home life and a sociopathic mind, his self-described "gift
for chemistry" is put to obviously nefarious uses, occasionally using
friends as guinea pigs before the main attraction.
The director, Benjamin Ross, makes a tremendously impressive debut
here. His selection of music together with his fluid editing and
camera-work often produce stirring and exciting results, the 1960s
small British town setting keenly observed, with a very black wit.
Graham's wicked stepmother, played by the singular Ruth Sheen (seen in
many Mike Leigh films), joyfully accepts her first dose of poison after
finding a box of Velvet Victories chocolates on her bedroom pillow,
with a note reading "To my darling mother, xxxx." There's a vivid sense
of the dustiness of the Young household, the darkness of Graham's
bedroom punctured by the eerie glow of his flasks, the frustration of
an overcrowded working class household where the telly's always running
with the silliness of popular variety programs. The film also adroitly
contrasts the self-important grandeur of Young's genocidal ambitions
with the unglamorous pettiness of the actual crimes and the prosaic
Bovingdon environment to which his perpetration of them was fortunately
limited (the real Graham Young had wanted to be known as "The World's
Poisoner," but was instead given the considerably less flattering
moniker "The Teacup Poisoner"). Absurdity and grimness are very
skillfully balanced. A marvelous, overlooked film.
12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :- Fascinatingly mean-spirited, 3 November 2000
Author:
the narrator from Sydney, Australia
This is one sick, twisted movie. It's also a brilliant one. It's the true
story of a young boy who tests his homemade poisons on his family, with
terrible, yet successful results. Great performances, stylish camerawork,
great dialogue. In a way it is a lot like Fargo, it's a true story turned
into a quirky, riveting, twisted and original movie. 8/10.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- Dark and amusing but not to all tastes, 3 May 2003
Author:
bob the moo from Birmingham, UK
As a boy, Graham was always keen on chemistry. When he is introduced to a
deadly chemical he begins to conduct experiments on his cruel family
namely by slowly poisoning his mother. Shortly after her death Graham is
caught for her murder and sentenced to a mental institution. With help and
treatment from a physiatrist, Graham is rehabilitated and released into the
community. But can his love of poison be controlled?
I first saw this in the cinema many years ago and held off writing a review
because I wanted to be sure that I could give it a fair review memory not
that great you know. So I watched it on channel 4 last week and was quite
taken aback I didn't remember it being quite that dark and disturbed. The
plot is quite like Kind Hearts & Coronets in the set up and delivery (more
in the delivery) but is a lot darker and more cruel than that classic. The
comedy is of the very dark type and mostly comes from Graham's narration.
His narration plays his acceptance of very shocking events as
run-of-the-mill things that happen in the background, this juxtaposition
works well and makes it funny.
The actual poisonings are not always easy to laugh through, while some of
his mother's ordeal is played for laughs, most of it is quite cruel and
upsetting. I think it worked well for playing the audience on the fact that
we didn't quite know what this was it was based on a true story yet was
played for laughs as well as serious at times. However this same ploy is to
it's weakness as it is difficult to settle into for this same reason. The
director seems very assured and handles this better, mixing inappropriate
music with the action as well as directing it very flat and
clinically.
O'Conor is the perfect choice for the role. Onscreen he is cold and cruel
but it is his narration is where he excels delivering perfectly deadpan
lines. The support cast are all OK but mostly play exaggerated characters
on the whole British stereotypes and such. The film wisely leaves them as
undeveloped this because if we cared too much for them or related to them
then it would have been impossible to feel anything but revulsion for
Graham. As cardboard cutouts they seem less than Graham in terms of the
film (wonder how the real victims' families felt about this
view).
Overall this is a strange film but one that has enough going for it to be
worht watching. However it should be noted that it is quite cruel and
upsetting we are not allowed to feel anything for Graham's victims. The
humour is rarely laugh out loud funny and this will probably only be for
those who like their comedy very dark.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :- A funny, witty, and creepy glimpse inside genius gone horribly wrong., 23 May 1999
Author:
Nyssa from Seattle, Washington
Director Benjamin Ross has done a terrific job creating a humorously
warped
view of life through the eyes of Graham Young, alienated boy genius and
serial poisoner. Hugh O'Conor perfectly portrays Graham's carefully
studied
innocent appearance, which Graham constantly feigns lest anyone find out
what he is really thinking in his twisted, calculating mind. O'Conor
manages the tricky job of looking innocent enough to fool the other
characters, but maniacal enough that the audience always knows what is
going
on.
Through Graham's eccentric (to say the least) point-of-view, we witness
the
painfully mundane Young family, the pitifully easy to fool psychiatric and
medical community, and the pathetically simple-minded middle-class. Ross
captures the comic disdain with which Graham sees his surroundings without
disposing of the distance necessary to be horrified at Graham's
"experiments" and the fate of his unwitting subjects.
Because of Ross' careful tightrope walking between distance from and
intimacy with Graham, the audience can't fully fall under Graham's spell
and
sympathize completely with him. There are some gruesome scenes of people
reacting to poison, but these are necessary to heighten the audience's
horror at Graham's incapability to assess his own actions and to recognize
his own evil. Ross gives us an entertaining, yet twisted, glimpse into
genius gone wrong, without sensationalizing Graham as a
hero.
It is also very hard to go out for drinks or coffee after seeing this
movie.
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- One of the Best Sleepers, 27 December 2002
Author:
jaiken007 (jaiken007@hotmail.com) from Oakland, CA
I truly love this film. The look on young Graham's face when he got his
first chemistry set was probably like the one on my own when I got mine.
Because I loved my family, I chose other areas of research and never
experimented on them. That said, I found the humor in this black comedy
right on target and I actually felt sorry for the young poisoner. If he
had
worked for Q branch he most likely would have received a knighthood
rather
than a prison sentence. I have no idea how close to the truth this movie
is
but it is on my top 20 films of all time.
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- The best thing since "A Clockwork Orange", 29 June 2001
Author:
Slice of LIfe from Hong Kong
I don't know what to make of it, honestly. When I first saw it (on late
night, and I stayed up till three AM watching it), I thought it was a little
like "A Clockwork Orange".
Graham Young (Hugh O'Conor) I found an odd mixture of three parts: curiosity
(what leads him to poisoning), clinical detachment (as he watches the
results), and a longing to belong (when he tries to be normal -and fails
miserably).
First he silently threatens everyone with a gruesome retaliation for the
slightest things, and then charts their decline with frightful accuracy as
they get sicker and sicker. After that, he retreats into his den again
until something better comes along. And then he gets caught.
Then there's that uproarious scene when he's out with a girl, and he tries
to get her in a conversation on disembowelment. You can almost see her turn
green as he gets into stride. To him, it's an innocent thing; something he
likes. For her (and for us, the audience), it's...sick.
I thought that the rehabilitation sequence was a farce. It's as ludicrous
as the rest of this quirky gem of a movie, with great performances by all
the actors, particularly Hugh O'Conor. He says more with his eyes than most
could with their lips.
I mean, the movie is funny (not ha ha funny, though), dripping with
corrosive irony. Young is all at once twisted and innocent, torn between
conforming and that endless fascination with poison. The comparisons
between this and "Clockwork" are almost inevitable, but unlike Kubrick's
thriller, this one has a more subtle, menacing tone, for the mind rather
than for the eye. It's not a laugh-out-loud film, though it's undeniably
hilarious. Whatever you feel, it's kept inside.
If you're one with a sensitive stomach, suicidal tendencies, strange
addictions, goody-goodies/puritans, then stay away. Otherwise, WATCH THIS
FILM!
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :- Do you take Antimony in your tea?, 18 September 1999
Author:
Omni-6
One problem with this movie was that I wasn't sure whether I was allowed to
laugh or not. It's a sick, black comedy, and quite disturbing given that
it's based on truth. And yet it's strangely humourous. Hugh O'Conor is
absolutely PERFECT in the role of Graham Young. As a longtime Hugh O'Conor
fan, I will admit I may have been biased towards this film -- after all, I
will enjoy his work in any movie -- but this movie was also well-acted by
the entire cast. If you can stomach it, watch the film.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- A modern cult classic! overwhelmingly hilarious, totally sick and twisted!, 31 October 2001
Author:
John (reasonbran234@aol.com) from ny
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS***
one of the funniest movies i've ever seen, but funny in the same way that
william burroughs thought that 'a clockwork orange' by anthony burgess was
'funny'. that is, so jaded and amoral that one can't help but drop all
sentimentality and moral pretension and laugh one's behind off! our young
anti hero is a chemistry major who decides to take vengeance on society
(and
his stepmother in particular) by unleashing his evil genius without
worrying
about those illusory trivialities, y'know, right and wrong. he is about
as
lovable as alex from 'clockwork' and i don't know if anyone cared when he
killed himself at the end, but i sure didn't. this kid is a real nihilist,
a
nietzschean monster who takes delight in the suffering of others and who
uses his abnormal and deviant intellect to satisfy his own power lust.
there's something humorous about the scene where he arrives home and is
nabbed by the cops; he looks with rage at the police officer who pounced
on
him and says something to the effect of, "that was the X-dose you f**king
idiot, now you've ruined everything! everything!" he clearly has no sense
of how just plain psycho he is, and in some depraved way his utter
disregard
for morality and other human beings is oddly hilarious. this is decidedly
NOT a movie for sanctimonious or extramoral people, and if you're easily
offended or disgusted by violence, don't touch it. but if you're like me
and
have a black-and postmodernist-humor thing goin on, don't rent it but BUY
it!
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- Twisted and original!, 19 August 2001
Author:
INFOFREAKO from Perth, Australia
'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' is one of the freshest, most daring and
original movies to come out of Britain in years. Hugh O'Conor is perfect as
the oddball "young poisoner", and the supporting cast are all splendid too.
I'm not sure just how accurate the events portrayed here are, but it doesn't
matter anyway. As a movie this is a compelling black comedy that will be
appreciated by anyone who is looker for something that isn't your usual
bland and simplistic fare.
I shudder to think how this plot and characters would have been handled in a
mainstream Hollywood movie! I can just see Leo or Toby in the lead role, an
"explanation" for his psychotic behaviour, and an uplifting, heart warming
happy ending. Thankfully Benjamin Ross has a more unique vision, and he has
given us a movie that will stay with you for years to come. 'The Young
Poisoner's Handbook' is fantastic!
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- Sick 'n Brilliant, 11 January 2000
Author:
bgilch from Montreal, Quebec
This delightfully evil confection should warm the cockles of any mad
scientist's heart. Our 14 year old hero dispenses antimony with precision
glee and soon graduates to thalium before getting caught. But that's just
the beginning really. A preternaturally good perfomance in the lead role,
superior period decor of the hideous early sixties, a score to bless
Purcell's heart, a cool and steady directorial hand and a wicked sympathy
for the young man in question work to maximal effect. This may be the first
quality film I've seen that genuinely crosses the line of sympathy for the
evildoer; toss in lots of vomit and the best gotcha jump scene ever carried
off, and there's lots to shy away from--for the faint of heart. Oliver
Sacks sometimes writes about the joys and freedoms for the mind of a young
chemistry set owner in the old days before restriction but I don't think he
had this in mind. And my girlfriend wonders why I shy away from potluck
dinners.
Own the rights?
Buy it at Amazon Rent it at blockbuster.comDiscuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summaryplot synopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Young Poisoner's Handbook (1995) More at IMDbPro »
13 out of 13 people found the following comment useful :-
Black comedy near its best, 17 July 2004
Author: BornJaded (BornJaded@aol.com) from United States
Why has 'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' not developed a cult following? I have some theories, but this is certainly a film that should have found a larger audience at some point.
This is pitch black British comedy near its best, reminiscent of both Hitchcock and 'A Clockwork Orange' -- its three-part structure is similar to that of 'A Clockwork Orange,' given that the protagonist is free, then confined, then free again to illustrate the vanity of "rehabilitation" where it concerns psychopaths, and we even hear excerpts from Purcell's Funeral Music for Queen Mary, which Wendy Carlos incorporated into her electronic score for 'Clockwork.' Whether 'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' is paying homage or borrowing, the movie itself is a highly individual work that should please anyone with a fondness for Orwell or Ealing.
Hugh O'Conor, with his wide-eyed gift for simulating innocence, is an ideal selection for the role of Graham Young, the real-life poisoner of the British village of Bovingdon, who slowly poisoned his stepmother to death with antimony sulfide, finishing the job with thallium. Cursed with a banal home life and a sociopathic mind, his self-described "gift for chemistry" is put to obviously nefarious uses, occasionally using friends as guinea pigs before the main attraction.
The director, Benjamin Ross, makes a tremendously impressive debut here. His selection of music together with his fluid editing and camera-work often produce stirring and exciting results, the 1960s small British town setting keenly observed, with a very black wit. Graham's wicked stepmother, played by the singular Ruth Sheen (seen in many Mike Leigh films), joyfully accepts her first dose of poison after finding a box of Velvet Victories chocolates on her bedroom pillow, with a note reading "To my darling mother, xxxx." There's a vivid sense of the dustiness of the Young household, the darkness of Graham's bedroom punctured by the eerie glow of his flasks, the frustration of an overcrowded working class household where the telly's always running with the silliness of popular variety programs. The film also adroitly contrasts the self-important grandeur of Young's genocidal ambitions with the unglamorous pettiness of the actual crimes and the prosaic Bovingdon environment to which his perpetration of them was fortunately limited (the real Graham Young had wanted to be known as "The World's Poisoner," but was instead given the considerably less flattering moniker "The Teacup Poisoner"). Absurdity and grimness are very skillfully balanced. A marvelous, overlooked film.
12 out of 14 people found the following comment useful :-

Fascinatingly mean-spirited, 3 November 2000
Author: the narrator from Sydney, Australia
This is one sick, twisted movie. It's also a brilliant one. It's the true story of a young boy who tests his homemade poisons on his family, with terrible, yet successful results. Great performances, stylish camerawork, great dialogue. In a way it is a lot like Fargo, it's a true story turned into a quirky, riveting, twisted and original movie. 8/10.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-
Dark and amusing but not to all tastes, 3 May 2003
Author: bob the moo from Birmingham, UK
As a boy, Graham was always keen on chemistry. When he is introduced to a deadly chemical he begins to conduct experiments on his cruel family namely by slowly poisoning his mother. Shortly after her death Graham is caught for her murder and sentenced to a mental institution. With help and treatment from a physiatrist, Graham is rehabilitated and released into the community. But can his love of poison be controlled?
I first saw this in the cinema many years ago and held off writing a review because I wanted to be sure that I could give it a fair review memory not that great you know. So I watched it on channel 4 last week and was quite taken aback I didn't remember it being quite that dark and disturbed. The plot is quite like Kind Hearts & Coronets in the set up and delivery (more in the delivery) but is a lot darker and more cruel than that classic. The comedy is of the very dark type and mostly comes from Graham's narration. His narration plays his acceptance of very shocking events as run-of-the-mill things that happen in the background, this juxtaposition works well and makes it funny.
The actual poisonings are not always easy to laugh through, while some of his mother's ordeal is played for laughs, most of it is quite cruel and upsetting. I think it worked well for playing the audience on the fact that we didn't quite know what this was it was based on a true story yet was played for laughs as well as serious at times. However this same ploy is to it's weakness as it is difficult to settle into for this same reason. The director seems very assured and handles this better, mixing inappropriate music with the action as well as directing it very flat and clinically.
O'Conor is the perfect choice for the role. Onscreen he is cold and cruel but it is his narration is where he excels delivering perfectly deadpan lines. The support cast are all OK but mostly play exaggerated characters on the whole British stereotypes and such. The film wisely leaves them as undeveloped this because if we cared too much for them or related to them then it would have been impossible to feel anything but revulsion for Graham. As cardboard cutouts they seem less than Graham in terms of the film (wonder how the real victims' families felt about this view).
Overall this is a strange film but one that has enough going for it to be worht watching. However it should be noted that it is quite cruel and upsetting we are not allowed to feel anything for Graham's victims. The humour is rarely laugh out loud funny and this will probably only be for those who like their comedy very dark.
8 out of 8 people found the following comment useful :-

A funny, witty, and creepy glimpse inside genius gone horribly wrong., 23 May 1999
Author: Nyssa from Seattle, Washington
Director Benjamin Ross has done a terrific job creating a humorously warped view of life through the eyes of Graham Young, alienated boy genius and serial poisoner. Hugh O'Conor perfectly portrays Graham's carefully studied innocent appearance, which Graham constantly feigns lest anyone find out what he is really thinking in his twisted, calculating mind. O'Conor manages the tricky job of looking innocent enough to fool the other characters, but maniacal enough that the audience always knows what is going on.
Through Graham's eccentric (to say the least) point-of-view, we witness the painfully mundane Young family, the pitifully easy to fool psychiatric and medical community, and the pathetically simple-minded middle-class. Ross captures the comic disdain with which Graham sees his surroundings without disposing of the distance necessary to be horrified at Graham's "experiments" and the fate of his unwitting subjects.
Because of Ross' careful tightrope walking between distance from and intimacy with Graham, the audience can't fully fall under Graham's spell and sympathize completely with him. There are some gruesome scenes of people reacting to poison, but these are necessary to heighten the audience's horror at Graham's incapability to assess his own actions and to recognize his own evil. Ross gives us an entertaining, yet twisted, glimpse into genius gone wrong, without sensationalizing Graham as a hero.
It is also very hard to go out for drinks or coffee after seeing this movie.
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

One of the Best Sleepers, 27 December 2002
Author: jaiken007 (jaiken007@hotmail.com) from Oakland, CA
I truly love this film. The look on young Graham's face when he got his first chemistry set was probably like the one on my own when I got mine. Because I loved my family, I chose other areas of research and never experimented on them. That said, I found the humor in this black comedy right on target and I actually felt sorry for the young poisoner. If he had worked for Q branch he most likely would have received a knighthood rather than a prison sentence. I have no idea how close to the truth this movie is but it is on my top 20 films of all time.
3 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-
The best thing since "A Clockwork Orange", 29 June 2001
Author: Slice of LIfe from Hong Kong
I don't know what to make of it, honestly. When I first saw it (on late night, and I stayed up till three AM watching it), I thought it was a little like "A Clockwork Orange".
Graham Young (Hugh O'Conor) I found an odd mixture of three parts: curiosity (what leads him to poisoning), clinical detachment (as he watches the results), and a longing to belong (when he tries to be normal -and fails miserably).
First he silently threatens everyone with a gruesome retaliation for the slightest things, and then charts their decline with frightful accuracy as they get sicker and sicker. After that, he retreats into his den again until something better comes along. And then he gets caught.
Then there's that uproarious scene when he's out with a girl, and he tries to get her in a conversation on disembowelment. You can almost see her turn green as he gets into stride. To him, it's an innocent thing; something he likes. For her (and for us, the audience), it's...sick.
I thought that the rehabilitation sequence was a farce. It's as ludicrous as the rest of this quirky gem of a movie, with great performances by all the actors, particularly Hugh O'Conor. He says more with his eyes than most could with their lips.
I mean, the movie is funny (not ha ha funny, though), dripping with corrosive irony. Young is all at once twisted and innocent, torn between conforming and that endless fascination with poison. The comparisons between this and "Clockwork" are almost inevitable, but unlike Kubrick's thriller, this one has a more subtle, menacing tone, for the mind rather than for the eye. It's not a laugh-out-loud film, though it's undeniably hilarious. Whatever you feel, it's kept inside.
If you're one with a sensitive stomach, suicidal tendencies, strange addictions, goody-goodies/puritans, then stay away. Otherwise, WATCH THIS FILM!
2 out of 2 people found the following comment useful :-
Do you take Antimony in your tea?, 18 September 1999
Author: Omni-6
One problem with this movie was that I wasn't sure whether I was allowed to laugh or not. It's a sick, black comedy, and quite disturbing given that it's based on truth. And yet it's strangely humourous. Hugh O'Conor is absolutely PERFECT in the role of Graham Young. As a longtime Hugh O'Conor fan, I will admit I may have been biased towards this film -- after all, I will enjoy his work in any movie -- but this movie was also well-acted by the entire cast. If you can stomach it, watch the film.
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
A modern cult classic! overwhelmingly hilarious, totally sick and twisted!, 31 October 2001
Author: John (reasonbran234@aol.com) from ny
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** one of the funniest movies i've ever seen, but funny in the same way that william burroughs thought that 'a clockwork orange' by anthony burgess was 'funny'. that is, so jaded and amoral that one can't help but drop all sentimentality and moral pretension and laugh one's behind off! our young anti hero is a chemistry major who decides to take vengeance on society (and his stepmother in particular) by unleashing his evil genius without worrying about those illusory trivialities, y'know, right and wrong. he is about as lovable as alex from 'clockwork' and i don't know if anyone cared when he killed himself at the end, but i sure didn't. this kid is a real nihilist, a nietzschean monster who takes delight in the suffering of others and who uses his abnormal and deviant intellect to satisfy his own power lust. there's something humorous about the scene where he arrives home and is nabbed by the cops; he looks with rage at the police officer who pounced on him and says something to the effect of, "that was the X-dose you f**king idiot, now you've ruined everything! everything!" he clearly has no sense of how just plain psycho he is, and in some depraved way his utter disregard for morality and other human beings is oddly hilarious. this is decidedly NOT a movie for sanctimonious or extramoral people, and if you're easily offended or disgusted by violence, don't touch it. but if you're like me and have a black-and postmodernist-humor thing goin on, don't rent it but BUY it!
1 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-
Twisted and original!, 19 August 2001
Author: INFOFREAKO from Perth, Australia
'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' is one of the freshest, most daring and original movies to come out of Britain in years. Hugh O'Conor is perfect as the oddball "young poisoner", and the supporting cast are all splendid too. I'm not sure just how accurate the events portrayed here are, but it doesn't matter anyway. As a movie this is a compelling black comedy that will be appreciated by anyone who is looker for something that isn't your usual bland and simplistic fare.
I shudder to think how this plot and characters would have been handled in a mainstream Hollywood movie! I can just see Leo or Toby in the lead role, an "explanation" for his psychotic behaviour, and an uplifting, heart warming happy ending. Thankfully Benjamin Ross has a more unique vision, and he has given us a movie that will stay with you for years to come. 'The Young Poisoner's Handbook' is fantastic!
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

Sick 'n Brilliant, 11 January 2000
Author: bgilch from Montreal, Quebec
This delightfully evil confection should warm the cockles of any mad scientist's heart. Our 14 year old hero dispenses antimony with precision glee and soon graduates to thalium before getting caught. But that's just the beginning really. A preternaturally good perfomance in the lead role, superior period decor of the hideous early sixties, a score to bless Purcell's heart, a cool and steady directorial hand and a wicked sympathy for the young man in question work to maximal effect. This may be the first quality film I've seen that genuinely crosses the line of sympathy for the evildoer; toss in lots of vomit and the best gotcha jump scene ever carried off, and there's lots to shy away from--for the faint of heart. Oliver Sacks sometimes writes about the joys and freedoms for the mind of a young chemistry set owner in the old days before restriction but I don't think he had this in mind. And my girlfriend wonders why I shy away from potluck dinners.
Add another comment
Related Links