|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|Index||12 reviews in total|
I really enjoy this movie every time I watch it. I think everything in
Tyson is just right. The actors are perfect, the music is perfect, the
script is perfect, and the boxing scenes are perfect. I really liked
how this movie starts out with Tyson as a young hood and shows him
become a champion. I liked the scenes with Tyson and Cus D'Amato. I
don't think they could've got anyone better to play Cus than George C.
Scott. He looks exactly like him in this and his acting was great.
Everyone was great here, but I think people should give a lot more
credit to Michael Jai White. I don't know what everyone was looking
for. When I watch the movie I forget it's an actor playing Mike Tyson.
He doesn't look exactly like him, but he really comes across as him.
Michael Jai White deserved a Golden Globe nomination for his
This movie also tries to show you the other side of the stories you heard about Tyson. You probably heard about how Tyson got fresh with Teddy's niece, but this movie shows you that maybe Jamie was going after Mike. You probably heard stories from Robin Givens, but this movie shows how deceptive she really was and how she took advantage of Mike. You probably heard stories about Don King. This movie shows what a jerk he was. It doesn't show it as much as his biopic does, but you get a pretty good idea. You probably heard that Tyson was convicted of rape, but this movie leaves it up to you. It doesn't prosecute him.
I also liked how the movie shows how Mike Tyson isn't the heartless fiend you think he is. It shows that he could love. He loved his mother, he loved Cus D'Amato, he loved Jim Jacobs, he loved Robin Givens, and he loved pigeons. When he loses these people, his life starts to go downhill. The movie also shows Mike Tyson isn't made out of stone. He really was nervous at times and he wasn't always strong, especially when Cus died.
There's really nothing you could say is wrong with this movie. It does everything it's supposed to and pushes all the right buttons. I even thought the fight scenes were great. They were accurate and staged beautifully. My favorite part is when Tyson fights Michael Spinks. You want to know what Tyson was all about watch that fight.
This movie was great for an HBO movie, but I still can't understand why a movie hasn't been released to theaters about Mike Tyson. Maybe they'll make one years and years from now. The movie Ali was just a blown opportunity and a waste of time. If anyone does make a Mike Tyson movie it better not be like that.
I don't just like this movie because I'm a huge Mike Tyson fan. If you took a person that despised Mike Tyson and told them to watch this they would probably end up understanding him by the time the movie's over. It shows who Mike Tyson truly was. I stress the word "was" because the man you see today is not Mike Tyson. The Mike Tyson I saw in this movie would've never lost to Evander Holyfield, or any other fighter that beat him today. The man I saw would've never bit Holyfield's ear, or did any of the things he does today. The Mike Tyson I know is the one I saw beat every challenger in sight. The Mike Tyson I saw knocked out Michael Spinks in 90 seconds. That is the only one I will ever see.
Aspect ratio: 1.33:1
Sound format: Stereo
Reverent - though scrupulously fair - account of the life and times of champion boxer Mike Tyson. Given his conviction on a rape charge, the film is careful not to portray him as hero or villain, but paints a warts-and-all portrait of his rise to fame, the pressures of success, and the people who shaped his destiny for good or bad. Constrained by time limits, the script gallops through a succession of relevant details, alighting briefly on significant events, culminating with Tyson's (temporary) downfall in 1995. Novices will be enlightened by the chronology, while boxing fans will be entertained by director Uli Edel's straight-arrow approach to the material. He portrays Tyson's life as a circus in which he was ultimately led astray by the circumstances of his own success. In fact, the script reserves most of its venom for Tyson's ex-wife Robin Givens, characterising her as an ungrateful gold-digger who took advantage of his naivety. Production values are uniformly solid and the cast is superb: Michael Jai White does a fair imitation of the title character; George C. Scott plays Tyson's mentor Cus D'Amato through acres of gritted teeth; and Paul Winfield was surely born to play Don King!
This 1995 made for TV. HBO original movie chronicles Tyson's discovery by Cus D' Amato in 1979 in a Catskill, NY Boxing Club to the 1991 alleged rape of a black beauty pageant contestant. And I must say this film is brilliant it has all the highs and lows of Tyson's ferocious career as he destroys the heavyweight ranks and becomes the youngest heavyweight champion ever, also the dispute and problems he had with former trainer and current boxing analyst and trainer Teddy Atlas the film also does a good job of showing Tyson's rage and anger brought on by the deaths of his mother and the legend Cus D' Amato. I am especially glad that this film shows just how much of a gold digger ex-wife actress Robin Givens and her mother really were alot of people blamed Mike for the problems with him and Givens, but this film finally showed how manipulative Robin really was. And the crushing defeat to Buster Douglas was shown with such realism and Don King is wonderfully depicted as guiding Mike Tyson's career along perfect, finally the film does a great job of leaving the viewer to really have doubts if Mike really commited the rape or not watch and you will see. This movie airs often on the HBO networks you must record this for keep sake if your a boxing fan and followed the career of Tyson simply because of the realism it's like you were really there with Mike for the rise and fall.
The acting in this movie is great. This movie had a great storyline. This movie is based on the book fire and fear. If you read the book then you should watch the movie. This movie is very interesting and if you hate Mike Tyson then maybe you should see this movie it might change your mind.
The movie "Tyson" chronicles Mike Tyson's life as a 12 year old boy,
with 38 arrests to his credit,in Brooklyn to the undisputed heavyweight
champion of the world. It was fame and fortune more then the mean
streets of Bronsville Brooklyn that lead to Tyson's downfall that
eroded his talents in the ring and civility out of it. Tyson after
being taken under the wings of "Trainer of Champions" Cus D'Amato who
fine tuned his talents as a boxer as well has gave him, with Cus's
wife, a family passed away leaving Tyson alone and open to be exploited
by wannabe shysters like boxing promoter Don King as well as gold
diggers like his first wife Robin Givens and her Moma Ruth Roper. By
the time they got through with Mike he not only ended up losing his
title , "The Baddest Man on the Planet Earth", as world heavyweight
champion but most of his estimated hundreds of millions he won in the
The knock-out punch that really did Tyson in was his conviction of raping 18 year old Miss African American contestant Desiree Washington whom many people who followed the trail feel Tyson was innocent of. We get to see a shy and at the same time out of control Mike Tyson turn his life around for the better with the help of his surrogate father Cus D'Amato who taught him to keep his aggressions in not out of the ring. It was Cus' death that left Tyson open to all the troubles that was to haunt him all his professional and personal life. Becoming the youngest man to win the heavyweight crown at the age of 20 by knocking out Trevor Berbick in the 2nd round on November 22, 1986 in Las Vages Tyson was unstoppable in the ring successfully defending his crown nine times. That's until he met journeyman boxer Buster Douglas in Tokyo Japan in early 1990. A 40 to 1 long-shot Duglas busted Tyson up for 9 rounds and in the 10th knocked him on queer street taking the title away from him. The fact that Tyson, who was drinking and partying instead of training for the fight, and his off the books manager Don King never took Douglas seriously was the main reason for his shocking defeat.
Just when Tyson was on his way to regain his lost heavyweight crown him becoming a judge in the Miss African American contest in Indiana ended up in a worst disaster then his loss to Douglas. Accused of rape by Miss Washington and standing trail it seemed that Tyson's reputation more then the evidence, that everyone felt was flimsy, that convicted him. Now in the spring of 1995 a convicted rapist and registered sex offender Tyson is given a second or is it third chance to regain his champion belt is where the movie ends.
The film Tyson to its credit shows Mike Tyson as a both troubled youth and man who's life suffered mostly from those who exploited his talents and money for their, not his, own personal gain. Still we can't excuse Tayson for his life of crime, mostly as a youth, and violence since he had everything going for him and ended up blowing it. And with that he blew his chance of possibly being the greatest heavyweight, topping the likes of Ali Marciano Dempsey and Joe Louis,champion in boxing history.
This is a made-for-TV flick about Iron Mike. As people have already
commented there are several memorable and incredible performances given
here. Scott is, to my mind, one of, if not the greatest American actor
who lived in the last century. Along with Jason Robards, Jack Lemmon,
Jimmy Cagney, and today Kevin Spacey. (Yes, I said it, Kevin ranks
right up there with the all-time champs. Don't believe me? See the
movie he did with Annette Benning and Chris Cooper, then watch the
Kaizer Soze flick. Unfortunately it is late and titles are escaping
So Scott steals the movie cursing and arguing and screaming his lungs out. By the way, after his death, it was rumored that D'Amato had forced Iron Mike to perform oral sex on him when Mike was a young boy under Cus's tutelage. True or not, it would certainly explain a lot....Paul Winfield as Don King is a great match. His performance is much more believable here than Ving Rhames's would be several years later on in "King". Tony LoBianco is good to as Jim Jacobs who for years managed Tyson. Jacobs incidentally was a jack-of-all-trades, winning the US Handball Championship for Men, having the greatest private collection of fight films ever collected, and being an expert on comic books. Talk about your Renaisannce guys. The only weak link is Michael Jai White. He doesn't really capture the caged-animal intensity of Iron Mike during his glory years. Tyson incidentally, should really consider making a film about his own life with actors of his choosing. Overall a good effort by some extremely talented actors.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
And I may win due to the amount of my anger towards them.
I'm so ignorant when it comes to boxing. I know nearly nothing about Mike Tyson. Though I watched the movie to know better. But I ended up hating all; the movie, boxing, Tyson and me !
What a load of crap this TV movie is. When you watch a bio-pic you wait for a point of view, unless it's a usual documentary. This time it couldn't reach this level of being that usual documentary. At least documentaries give you full useful data!
What did I learn from this movie? I'll happily tell you : Tyson is troubled. But why ? I didn't know (and I'm sure the makers of the movie don't !). Tyson did abuse his wife? No, she's a gold-digger who lies about that ?? I didn't figure it out either (so the makers!). Tyson has been beaten in Japan. So why was that? I didn't know. WAW. This movie got nothing to give !
And don't make me talk about the imbecile end about the "rape" matter. Firstly, it deals with it as something all the viewers know, so what about the ignorant ones like me? Secondly, it didn't show us did he do it or not? (Again, don't hypothesize that all the viewers know everything, otherwise why to make a biography movie in the first place ?!). Thirdly, what was the movie's own viewpoint towards the lead's motives ? NIL. Fourthly, it gives us nothing but one, very stupid, line in the end "the hero does things, but the coward doesn't do these things !!!!!" How brilliant ! Fifthly, it ends the movie, so unbearably cold, with the police capturing the champion while he looks to the flying birds maybe because they were all so lucky, not forced to work in this clueless movie, or god forbid watch it !
(Michael Jai White) resembled the real man in a lot of shots, but the important question would be : what was the final goal of his performance? Who is Mike Tyson? Why he went through a collapse ? What was his guilt ? Or was he guiltless ? It would have been good to answer these questions first to guide the actor, and the poor us too ! Yet, still the most importunate question at all is : How the people who make pointless, bad, and just exploitative movies like this GET AWAY WITH IT ?!!!!!
It left me laughing my heart out after this ending. I was asking myself "So why it was made ?!!". If money was the main problem in the lead's life; especially when many greedy people blockaded him, wanting nothing but earning big bucks from him, then definitely whoever made this movie are ones of them !
My verdict : A waste of time. And not even artistic, insightful, or entertaining waste of time. I only liked the presence of (Kristen Wilson), and the extremely hot girls in their colorful swimsuits before the end. Simply nothing was as clear !
I think we all agree that the character Mike Tyson leaves a lot to be said which is why I think the movie "Tyson" was pretty good given the resources it had to work with. The problem with making controversial biographies is that you can't provide the complete overall perspective, no matter how much of a budget you place on them. And also the fact that many viewers come in watching these movies with previously fixed opinions doesn't help either. For a 'made for TV' biography, I thought this movie was borderline excellent. I realize you can't encompass Iron Mike's entire life in an hour and some change but I thought this movie provided a great objectionable summary. It didn't uphold his character nor did it insult; it just stuck to the facts. I thought George C. Scott and Michael Jai White gave great performances. The only criticism I have is that a lot of the other character actors came off a little flat but it wasn't enough to take away from the overall result. To tell the truth, I'd watch a sequel provided the same crew got back together and stuck with the same (or rather similar) formula.
I'll be totally honest and say when Tyson beat Trevor Berbick to become
the youngest world heavyweight champion I was mesmerised by this boxer
. Lightning hand speed , power and someone who livened up the rather
staid and fractured heavyweight division that was being left behind in
a golden age of boxing that featured Leonard , Hagler , Hearns .Perhaps
the most sympathetic thing about him was his tale of why he took up
boxing , of the older kids beating him up and learning how to fight to
merely survive the human jungle of New York's mean streets . This
however turned out to be a fairy tale and the reality was Tyson learned
boxing in a reform school where he was sent to having carried a series
of street robberies and where he met Cus D'Amato who effectively
adopted the thug . It was D'Amato who steered Tyson from crime . As
well as being a mentor he was also something a spin doctor and the myth
of " poor unfortunate victim of bullying " was just that - a myth but
it makes for a nice story . After all a violent sociopath is no role
model , especially and ironically in the world of boxing where an
audience in general and an American audience in particular like their
heroes to be good guys . When D'Amato died in 1985 not long before
Tyson became world champion the only calming force in Tyson's life was
gone and the boxer was heading for the rocks . Before his loss to
Buster Douglas there were stories of street brawls outside the ring and
his fights inside the ring were often farcical . The division lacked
depth and his victories were either against fighters who were past
their sell by date like Larry Holmes or against opponents who'd go out
of their way to merely last the distance like Bonecrusher Smith or
against opponents who'd be in awe and freeze such as Frank Bruno or
Carl Williams . All this was before he was convicted of rape of course
To be fair this HBO bio-pic doesn't sugar coat the boxer as much as I remember . It does point out that Tyson the child was disturbingly street wise and was heavily involved in crime " Forty convictions ? Not even Al Capone had forty convictions ! " . It also makes a point that even in his teen years Tyson had a run in over a girl and that he contracted venereal disease . Not much of a role model is he ? but at least it doesn't paint him as a victim - well until later . Enter Paul Winfield who gives an all too realistic performance as Don King , a man so greedy and exploitative that he's a walking advert for Stalinism .Winfield has a lot of fun in the role and while you might say the performance is a little too obvious it'd be impossible to play King in a subtle manner as he's one of the most flamboyant , larger than life
characters in the world today . He goes out of his way to grasp the milk cow of Tyson in his talons . This is where things start falling apart to a degree . King exploits Tyson when he's at his most vulnerable but remember Tyson is a street smart thug who one would expect to know all about King . Heck I was a skinny Scottish teenager in the 1980s living on an obscure Island and I knew all about Don King so why not Tyson ? Total greed on Tyson's part wouldn't have everything to do with it ? No of course not . . It also insinuates that Tyson fell in love with the wrong woman - Robin Givens - and this contributed to his downfall . Well if you beat up your wife you can't blame her for walking out on you . Interesting this domestic abuse seems to be played down . Oh don't tell me she was just interested in Tyson's money . None of us are privy to the marriage between Givens and Tyson but if she was after Tyson's money wouldn't she have signed a pre nuptial agreement ? The amount of negative press against Givens from this period was disgraceful and it's not like Tyson had a glittering reputation where violence outside the ring was concerned .
Disgracefully when the rape case was done and dusted there were those commentators who were quite happy to fling more innuendo about the rape victim crying rape due to Tyson's wealth etc . The bio-pic does seem to suggest that we're supposed to make up our own mind if Tyson was guilty or not but the fact that a jury who sat in court all day everyday and listened to all the evidence from all sides found Tyson guilty of rape so there's no ambiguity involved - Tyson is a rapist and to suggest otherwise is a disgrace to both the victim and the rule of law
I do feel a bit sad at the former champion's situation, and how he was led
astray by fame and Wealth. It is a point,that if we desire to achieve
greatness,we have to earn it by work.The bars are made by the
man,Himself;This confused and misunderstood athlete is only to blame,
because He refuses to change His World,His Life.In the movie, we see his
tough exterior is rough,He does not trust or rely on the guidance of
others.He does not move forward when tough times arise(such as death of
There is an old fable of a "Phoenix rising out of the ashes it dwells in".As a role model for children, celebrities must dwell on past mistakes and learn what Society requires of them.I believe how they achieve a reputable name, is based on the impressions of others.
|Page 1 of 2:|| |
|External reviews||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|