8.0/10
771
15 user 5 critic

Hiroshima (1995)

PG | | Drama, War | TV Movie 6 August 1995
The grisly events leading to the first attack with a nuclear weapon.
Reviews
Nominated for 2 Primetime Emmys. Another 6 wins & 6 nominations. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Hiroshima (TV Movie 2005)
Documentary | Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  

Documentary with dramatic reenactments with actors to describe what dropping the bomb on Hiroshima was like.

Director: Paul Wilmshurst
Stars: John Hurt, Shuntaro Hida, George Elsey
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  

Using extensive interviews with survivors and archival footage, an examination reveals the aftermath of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Director: Steven Okazaki
Stars: Harold Agnew, Shuntaro Hida, Kiyoko Imori
Documentary
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  
Director: Lucy van Beek
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.1/10 X  
Directors: Kinji Fukasaku, Koreyoshi Kurahara
Stars: Bunta Sugawara, Keiko Matsuzaka, Kôichi Satô
Day One (TV Movie 1989)
Drama | History
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.7/10 X  

Based on true events surrounding the creation of the atomic bomb, this drama follows the complicated relationship between physicist Leo Szilard, scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer and Gen. ... See full summary »

Director: Joseph Sargent
Stars: Brian Dennehy, David Strathairn, Michael Tucker
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Lynne Adams ...
Reporter
...
...
Joseph Stiborik
...
James Bradford ...
...
J. Winston Carroll ...
Chief Justice Stone (as J.W. Carroll)
Serge Christianssens ...
Joseph Stalin (as Serge Christiaenssens)
Dan Corby ...
Sailor
...
...
John Kuharek (as Teddy Lee Dillon)
Strahil Goodman ...
Stalin's Interpreter (as Strahil Dobrev)
...
Reporter
Domenico Fiore ...
Harold Urey (as Dom Fiore)
Frank Fontaine ...
Reporter
Edit

Storyline

Harry Truman, the successor to the Oval Office after the late President Rosevelt, is plagued with the decisions of war that could save or cost a thousand lives. He is then confronted with the nuclear weapons project, which he approves. As tension ensues (although it is difficult to get into this because most know the end) Truman must make the devastating desicion to use the bomb of all bombs. After some delivering japanese performances, Truman must force suffering on the japanese people again in order to end the war. Written by kloqwerk

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

For the first time the truth about the decision that changed the world.

Genres:

Drama | War

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG for war violence including footage of bomb devastation, and for some language | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

|

Language:

|

Release Date:

6 August 1995 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Hiroszima  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

(Showtime Library Print) | (dvd release)

Sound Mix:

Aspect Ratio:

1.33 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Spottiswoode commented to the pilot about what a shame it was that of the thousands of the magnificent machines built, that only the B-29 one was still flying. The pilot (a World War Two veteran) was not so nostalgic, and replied "This thing was designed and built for just one purpose; to kill thousands of people at a time. One is more than enough." See more »

Goofs

A comment was made in a conference with Col. Tibbets that changing course over the target from going upwind to downwind; "lowering the airspeed over the target" was not recommended. Airspeed is not a function of prevailing winds even if 1 to 3 times or more than that of the aircraft's speed. Groundspeed is the accurate term. Wind direction and speed has no effect on airspeed which is solely a function of aircraft attitude and power settings only. See more »

Soundtracks

Cantus in Memoriam for Benjamin Britten
Composed by Arvo Pärt
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
God is in the details
14 July 2002 | by (Deming, New Mexico, USA) – See all my reviews

A very good docudrama. But you must be in the mood. It's a low-budget enterprise, talky, and with no bravura performances. Why is it good, then? I guess it's because it makes certain demands on the intelligence and moral concerns of the viewer that few other renditions of this story have bothered to even attempt. For many years, the United States mythos handled the issue in the most simplistic way. The Japanese were all kamikazes, an invasion of the Japanese homeland would cost untold thousands of lives, so we had to nuke them. Recent revisionist history has given us another version of what happened. The Japanese were on their last legs and they knew it. They were sending out peace feelers through Sweden, Switzerland, and Russia. The United States ignored these because we wanted revenge, so we had to nuke them, and fast.

This film illustrates exceedingly well both the Japanese and American sides of the issue, with restraint and intelligence. There are neither heroes nor villains here. And no easy shots are made at particular figures. We can often tell, in conventional flicks, who is good and who is bad by the simple expedient of seeing whether a given character is handsome or homely. We tend not to notice this casting sleight of hand in our own movies because the difference in appearance supports our own prejudices. (We want the villain to be ugly.) But if you want this trick to be in your face, take another look at "The Cranes are Flying," a Russian war movie in which the American officer looks and sounds like a fat bumbling idiot, while the Russian commander is ruggedly good-looking and wears a tolerant shrink-like smile. Such cheap symbolism certainly isn't committed here. The commander of the Japanese army, who wants to fight to the last man, is both attractive and highly principled. Truman may not be a brilliant thinker but he is down-home shrewd and up front about everything. (If there is a problem with the casting it is that the actor playing Curtis LeMay is too handsome and polite for the part. LeMay was a courageous, ruthless, cigar-smoking blowhard, whom no one but a mother would call handsome.)

So why was the bomb dropped? Evidently through a series of stochastic misunderstandings -- in intentions, exchanges, even in the translation of particular words. And ultimately in the rush of the United States to end the war -- for any number of reasons, including strictly political ones -- and in the desire on the part of the Japanese to find some sort of honorable peace in which their emporer retained his sanctity, leading to actions too deliberate to satisfy the Allies.

The film is at its weakest in posing a false dilemma. (Or maybe the historical characters were responsible.) (1) We invade the islands, or (2) we nuke them without warning. All the possibilities in between are dismissed for one reason or another. One of them, given short shrift, is the possibility of a naval blockade which would shut off all supplies and cancel all naval traffic from the islands. Japan having no natural resources worth mentioning, it would have been only a matter of time before it worked. Loss of life would have been minimal, and we would not have had to use the bombs -- plural, Nagasaki was destroyed only three days after Hiroshima. One of the reasons repeatedly brought up in favor of using the bomb is that the American taxpayer has put out two billion dollars for this gadget, and if it weren't used they would want to know why their money was spent developing it. (I don't know of any words adequate to describe this sort of logic.) A blockade, however, would have taken more time, which would have involved waiting, which is not our strong suit. Another weakness is that James F. Byrne was a personal friend of Truman's. Truman, uncertain and new to the presidency, looked at him as a font of wisdom. And Byrne was a devoted hawk. This isn't made entirely clear, but it was in fact the case.

Well, who knows what we and the Japanese should have done? Easy enough to make retrospective judgments. However, they should perhaps be made anyway. Maybe knowing what went wrong last time will help us prevent things from going so terribly wrong next time.


26 of 33 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?