| Page 1 of 30: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 297 reviews in total |
41 out of 48 people found the following review useful:
Not too bad actually, 8 November 2004
![]()
Author:
Kristine (kristinedrama14@msn.com) from Chicago, Illinois
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
Actually, after seeing the rating on Halloween 6, I have to admit that
I was a bit scared to see this movie, not because it's a horror story,
but because it just had a low rating. But still I wanted to complete
the Halloween series and when I rented this movie, I was really
surprised that I liked it as much as I did. I think the rating is a bit
harsh, this story brought us back into the story with Jamie, even
though a warning in advance, she does get killed off with this sequel,
I liked how they continued the story with one of the original
characters, Tommy Doyle. It was cool to see him grown up and how the
events of 1978 effected him. Honestly I don't know why this movie has a
lower rating than Halloween 5, but I guess to each his own, but I
really do think this story carries itself a lot better.
Michael Myers, his niece Jamie Lloyd, and the mysterious Man in Black
have all been in hiding for six years. It is revealed that the Man in
Black is the leader of a Druid-like cult, and the Man in Black
kidnapped Jamie and had her impregnated. The baby is born on Halloween
Eve and is carried away by the Man in Black. Later that night, a nurse
helps Jamie and her baby escape. Michael Myers, in pursuit of Jamie and
her newborn, kills the nurse. Jamie, meanwhile, steals the truck and
flees to a dark and empty bus station where she calls in to a radio
show that happens to be doing a broadcast about the Haddonfield
murders. Jamie gets on the air, begging for help and warning of
Michael's imminent return. Beaten and exhausted, she makes her way
inside of an old barn where Michael is waiting for her. He kills Jamie,
only to find that Jamie does not have the baby. Meanwhile, Tommy Doyle
has his eye on a family who's moved into the old Myers house across the
street from the boarding house where he lives. The boarding house is
run by a mysterious old woman named Minnie. Tommy has been obsessed
with finding the truth behind the murderous motives of Michael Myers.
After hearing Jamie begging for help on a local radio show, Tommy finds
her baby at the bus station and takes him into hiding. The people
living in the Myers house are relatives of the Strode family, and among
the current residents are Kara Strode and her son Danny. The plot takes
a turn when the Man in Black finally reveals himself as Dr. Wynn from
the original Halloween. Wynn has been experimenting with pure evil,
does he think this is a good idea? Happy Halloween.
Granted, Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers is very different than
the other Halloween stories, but I think this was a good pick up. Plus
you have to admit that Jamie's death is very effective and scary. The
whole cult thing was a bit much, but still I think it was a good scare
factor to add into the story. The acting is better I think and the
writing was a little more accurate. Plus unlike Halloween 5, Michael
actually scared me again, thank God, I was getting a little frightened
that he was loosing his touch and his butcher knife. So I do recommend
this movie if you're looking to complete the series or if you're just
looking for a good scare.
6/10
30 out of 41 people found the following review useful:
This should have been the final film in the Halloween series., 16 June 2004
![]()
Author:
Miyagis_Sweaty_wifebeater (sirjosephu@aol.com) from Sacramento, CA
Halloween 666 (1995) The producer's cut review!
Halloween 666 starts of with a recap of the horrific ending to Part
five. If you thought the last chapter was dark, this one will really
blow your mind. A mysterious "Man in Black" has raided the Haddonfield
Police Department freeing Micheal Myers. In the process poor Jamie
Lloyd was abducted by strange cultists. What they want with her? Who
knows, but let's just say her long suffering will end soon. Doctor
Loomis is back spending the rest of his twilight years trying to stop
Michael Myers from killing any more innocents (good luck). A friend of
Loomis, Doctor Wynn comes back after a four sequel hiatus to help the
good doctor. Another old face from part one guest stars as well.
This dark and dreary sequel was dismantled during the post production
editing. For some reason the distributors felt that the final product
wasn't worth the average horror film watcher's time. So they decide to
dumb it down. Then after having the film sit on the shelf for several
months it laid an egg at the box office. No matter what they did to the
film, they made it worse. They should have left well enough alone. Hey,
the film company knows better than the filmmakers now....don't they?
Producer's Cut :Highly recommended
Released version: Not recommended
22 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
It Was A Really Good Film, It Could Have Been Better, 11 July 2003
![]()
Author:
WTH_MovieFan
This was a really interesting Halloween film. I wasnt to thrilled with the whole Thorn theory but it still makes for a good film. I liked getting to see Tommy Doyle back but sadly Donald Pleasance died right after shooting. The film had a really REALLY bad director who didnt give a flip about the series, from what I heard treated Donald bad, and wouldnt let Danielle Harris come back as Jamie. Its like he was just trying to bring down the film, but I still liked it. There were alot of cuts and music changes and if you're lucky you can get the Producers Cut which features over 40 min. of never before scenes. With those scenes it turns into a whole new movie. Check it out if you have the chance.
40 out of 70 people found the following review useful:
The second best sequel in the series., 17 April 2001
![]()
Author:
Marc Fantozzi (shelleyfantozzi@dingoblue.net.au) from Perth, Australia
Wow, "The Curse of Michael Myers" what a great film. Suspenseful,
entertaining, creative and a clever plot which I love. Many hate the 'Thorn'
concept, I love it. I think that it gives the Halloween series some plot.
Marianne Hagan is a wonderful actress and turns in a excellent performance,
especially for her first film and Paul Rudd and Donald Pleasence are great
also. My only complaint is that why wasn't Danielle Harris in this film as
Jamie? She wanted to return, but the producers said no. I thought J.C Brandy
was great, but I love Danielle Harris. Still, I love Halloween: The Curse of
Michael Myers. I think The Shape's mask looks the best in this film and
George P. Wilbur is the best Michael Myers ever. Incredibly creepy and
suspenseful, Halloween 6 rules!
I adore this very violent, but immensely enjoyable film. The Halloween
horror series - by far the best in the Genre.
10 out of 10.
14 out of 21 people found the following review useful:
Must see the Producer's Cut, 24 April 2003
![]()
Author:
deadb0y from US
This movie is pretty good as it is, but the unreleased Producer's Cut is my favorite movie in the series after the original. Jamie's story is handled differently, the death scenes are done 10 times better, there's more footage of ritual type stuff giving more story about Micheal, Jamie and her baby. There is also an alternate ending which is also better. Why they didn't release this version instead I have no damned clue. If you can find this version, see it.
9 out of 12 people found the following review useful:
Underrated Sequel., 13 August 2004
![]()
Author:
youshotandywarhol from Oregon
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
For some reason, I always enjoy movies that people hate, when I really
don't think they're that bad - and this is one of those films. In the
case of this movie, I think it is way too over-criticized, I really
isn't that bad of a film at all. In fact, I think this is one of the
better sequels. "Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers" begins on the
night before Halloween, where Michael brutally murders Jamie Lloyd (who
was taken captive by the "Man In Black" in part 5) after she gives
birth to his baby. We are then introduced to the Strode family, who is
now coincidentally living in the old Myers house (which seems to change
in each film). Kara and her son Danny are the main characters, along
with Tommy Doyle, the now adult boy who survived the original killings.
They must fight together to save Jamie's baby from an evil cult that
takes care of Michael, while Michael himself is driven to kill by an
old Celtic ritual where he must sacrifice an entire family in
Haddonfield.
This is surely one of the best sequels in the series, in my opinion
anyway, and I can't understand all of the hate it has gotten. It had
some nice suspense, an interesting plot (but sometimes confusing, I'll
admit), some scary moments here and there, and plenty of gore and knife
slashings to appease all of you gorehounds. Not all of the acting
wasn't particularly great, but it was convincing enough for me.
Marianne Hagan is the leading lady and she is very likable. Paul Rudd
plays a grown-up Tommy Doyle, and is also very talented and plays his
part nicely. The rest of the supporting cast (besides the brilliant
Donald Pleasance) isn't much to praise, but it wasn't too bad either,
all things considered. I'm still not sure if giving an explanation for
why Michael kills was completely necessary, but it turned out to be
okay in the end and I wasn't upset with the way they tied everything
together. The open-ended conclusion was also kind of eerie, but could
have been something more.
I have also seen the infamous "Producer's Cut" of this film, the
original cut of it, and I think that in some respects, it is better. It
further explains the Thorn curse that drives Michael and has some extra
scenes that really helped support the film, plus the ending was a lot
better in my opinion. It felt more natural than the conclusion that
we're given in the studio cut of the film. I wish that Dimension would
release this alternate version of the film, because I personally think
it is better. The chances of that are very slim though.
Overall, "Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers" is a very good sequel
and will please all of the fans of the series. This movie isn't the
best of all horror movies, but it's definitely worth renting if you
want to see Michael do his thing. Just don't expect brilliance, and
you'll enjoy it. 7/10.
5 out of 6 people found the following review useful:
Way better than the bad reviews state, 28 June 2004
Author:
slayrrr666 (slayrrr666@yahoo.com) from Los Angeles, Ca
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
'Halloween VI: The Curse of Michael Myers' is easily one of the best
entries in the series that has a lot of good things going for it.
**SPOILERS**
A young woman, Jamie Lloyd (J.C. Brandy) gives birth to a baby and is
stalked though a sanitarium by Michael Myers. Jamie escapes the
sanitarium into a driving rainstorm, stealing a truck. Michael follows
her as Jamie's sister, Kara (Marianne Hagan) tries to calm her son
Danny (Devin Gardner) about the rain. One of the original children
Laurie Strode babysitted in the first 'Halloween,' Tommy Doyle (Paul
Rudd) warns that Michael is still alive as Michael tracks Jamie down to
a bus station outside Haddonfield. She escapes, but Michael kills her
later on. Tommy finds the baby Jamie hid from Michael in the bus
station, as Kara and her friend Beth (Mariah O'Brien) plan to throw a
Halloween party in Haddonfield. While Tommy seeks advice from Dr.
Loomis (Donald Pleasance) about Michael and the baby, Michael stalks
Kara's family. With the help of Tommy, Kara pieces together what is
actually going on. She learns that a Celtic ritual is encouraging
Michael to kill. While the town is at a Halloween party in Haddonfield,
Beth runs off with her boyfriend and gets killed. Kara watches, then
goes over to get Danny back as he ventures over. Kara knocks Michael
out and escapes with Danny and Loomis. They are all taken hostage by
Loomis' friend, Dr. Wynn (Mitch Ryan) who wants the baby to be the
ultimate sacrifice made to Michael to finally get him under control.
Kara is then taken to an old medical facility where Loomis and Tommy
break in and fight off Michael's repeated attempts to kill them.
The Good News: This is a really suspenseful movie. The beginning of
this is really creepy. There is a giant sense of unnervingness about
what's going to happen next. The scenes are very well put together that
do lead logically from one event to the next that keep you riveted to
the seat, or by now a chair, wondering when someone or something's
going to pop out next. I can't rate the first twenty minutes of this
film with enough praise, as it is surely entertaining, unique, and very
watchable. The rest of the film does have more of an honest attempt to
be more suspenseful that previous entries. When Kara returns home after
Michael has killed a family member or the first defense against Michael
are really quite inventive and frightening. There are tons of scenes
where the character slows down their actions to go slowly, giving the
impression that it will spook the audience. Michael does have a ton of
truly great kills, almost as great of kills than the first one. I can't
reveal what he does to people in this one, but they are really
inventive. Almost every single death is different, and they are some
deaths where Myers never even uses his knife. The plot is really fast
paced, where something happens every few minutes. I also have to say
that I love Michael's new mask in this one. It is still distinctly
Michael, but it has this Leatherface-ish quality to it. The mask looks
very much like a mask of human skin simply covered white that looks
very creepy that adds to his new persona. He has a return to his roots
with his behavior. He has a complete stalk and slash attitude, coming
relentlessly at his victim with no remorse offered to his victims,
which are easily the goriest kills in the whole series.
The Bad News: I don't know why I'm picking on this, but I hate the
total unrealisticness of how Myers moved in this movie. In one second,
he moves very slowly, taking his time to stalk someone and then he
stops to admire his work before continuing on to the next victim. I
prefer that image of Michael, being the slow stalker and unmerciful
killer that he has always been. However, he sometimes moved a little
differently. There are a couple of scenes where he moves very fast, as
if they moved the camera speeds to catch him at a different rate of
movement. It sounds and looks weird, but those who have seen it know.
Despite the fast plot, it is very confusing. It took a few turns to
fully understand the whole effect of what goes on in the movie.
The Final Verdict: If you can get around the confusing reason why this
film was made, you will find a great film here. It is high-action, high
gore and high body count throwback horror film from the 80's with a
90's approach to it. It is an underrated masterpiece in the Halloween
saga.
Rated R: Graphic Violence, Graphic Language, Brief Nudity, and a very
brief sex scene.
11 out of 18 people found the following review useful:
A Mess!, 14 August 2001
![]()
Author:
pizowell
Halloween 6 is simply a mess, what it has in style it totally lacks in substance. It just feels as if its incomplete and it is. Upon seeing The Producer's Cut, which I reccomend you find, it is a different film. While the theatrical version has more slash and less story The Producer's Cut is far superior. The suits behind H6 wanted to make an MTV style slasher to attract the teens, but they insult the viewers intelligence with an inane story and a wasted finale. Track down The Producer's Cut and avoid this version.
9 out of 15 people found the following review useful:
Cursed, 12 January 2004
![]()
Author:
blueulcercult from new hampshire
Taste is a subjective thing. Two people can watch the same movie with one
of them loving it and the other one hating it. As it concerns
'Halloween:the Curse of Michael Myers' I fall into the latter category.
I'm of the opinion that John Carpenter, in 1978, made one of that decade's
finest fright films, which despite its flaws, still holds up well into the
21st century. It reused many of the old horror film devices but utilized
them in original and effective ways. It had no pretensions that it was
anything other than a movie about an escaped mental patient stalking
babysitters on Halloween night. And yet there were 'ideas' in the film but
they were subtly introduced and not hammered into your skull. It juxtaposed
the myths of the macabre festival with the reality of what was taking place
in the story and it did this with a wonderful ambiguity.
The 'filmmakers' of this 'film' probably wouldn't even understand that
previous paragraph. That's why we're saddled us with this miserable and
inept piece of disposable celluloid. Direction, script, acting are of the
lowest strata imaginable. This is the type of film that is so mind
numbingly dull and nausea inducing as to make you want to crawl back into
the womb and die. It is also truly, truly sad to see veteran British actor
Donald Pleasence wasting his acting abilities with this saliva puddle of a
movie. He seems drained of all his energy and resigned to the fact that
this may be his last film. Maybe that's what killed him.
2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:
Worst., 3 October 2008
![]()
Author:
sam_aj_01 from United Kingdom
I planned on watching all of the Halloween movies after enjoying the
first so much but what the hell did this one lead to? It would seem
like a good idea having Tommy all grown-up after the event in the first
film but instead it was a desperate attempt to write-up another sequel.
Michael returns to finish off the remaining Strodes living in his very
house where he killed his sister. Little do they know, Michaels hot on
their trail with Loomis in the lead! Overall there was a good lot of
gore, a fair few jumps and a better looking Myers mask but it still
doesn't make up for the cheesy storyline.
A good Halloween fan should watch this, otherwise avoid at all costs!
| Page 1 of 30: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Amazon.com summary | Ratings |
| Newsgroup reviews | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |