IMDb > Hackers (1995) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb
Hackers
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Reviews & Ratings for
Hackers More at IMDbPro »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Page 6 of 22: [Prev][1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [Next]
Index 214 reviews in total 

"I'm gonna triple the RAM"

Author: marastar_2002 from United States
22 November 2010

When it comes to Hackers, you have to take it for what it is. Which is a completely ridiculous, over-the-top, happy-go-lucky techno-fantasy—and AMAZING.

Hackers presents every tech nerd's dream. Every geeky kid wants to be as good looking as Johnny Lee Miller, have Angelina Jolie fall for him, beat some skeezy bad guy at his own game, and live in a psychedelically manic underground world where you rollerblade everywhere with your best friends, secure in the knowledge that you're "elite".

For anyone who knows anything about computers, the "hacking" and technology parts of this movie are the best (funniest, most ludicrous) parts. But what the hell, it makes sense in context with the film's absolute lack of sense.

So don't watch the movie expecting any sort of reality other than the surreality contained within the film. Just watch it for the pretty people pretending they know something about hacking, and enjoy.

Was the above review useful to you?

Amazing in 1995! Funny in 2003!

9/10
Author: Paul (crashnbur) from Macon, GA
22 June 2003

Okay, so the plot of this movie seems a bit outlandish in 2003, but in 1995 this is where hacking was going! Of course, hacking has been misunderstood from day one, and aside from social-outcast stereotypes and the horrible hacking emulations, at least "Hackers" got the ball rolling for the defense of good-natured hackers, as opposed to 'crackers' (the ones who actually try to do damage).

The movie was meant to be taken only somewhat seriously eight years ago, and those who had no idea about computers (and some who still don't) were overwhelmed by what computers could supposedly do. Of course, we all know now how irrelevant the plot of this movie is to legitimate hacking, but it's still a great laugh for those of us that use computers too much.

Was the above review useful to you?

More glitz than bits

Author: Mephisto-24 from Perth, Australia
14 April 2003

Hackers is too lightweight to be a good thriller, but it works well if you see it as the hackers do - a series of games. The bet between Crash vs. Burn (ultra-hot Angelina Jolie) isn't very different from the competition between Plague and the younger hackers, except for the stakes. If you ignore the flashy and mostly meaningless computer graphics, you may notice some good in-jokes and a remarkable chemistry between many of the characters – Crash and Plague, Lord Nikon and Cereal Killer, and especially Crash and Burn. Apart from Lorraine Bracco, who seems completely lost, everyone seems to be having an enormous amount of fun: grab a can of Jolt, forget everything you know about programming, and join in the game.

Was the above review useful to you?

entertaining...

6/10
Author: Teewurstmann (twm@aintitcoolmail.com) from the cold north
12 February 2003

6 out of 10 Hackers is an entertaining movie. It was one of the first "computer thrillers". Well, not all hackers are "cyber punks" and not all script kiddies are actually hackers, maybe crackers.

If you know a little something about networks, computers, protocolls and Unix, then it upsets you that in such movies all the hacking is displayed with 3D graphics, big red "ACCESS DENIED" signs flashing up on the screen... That's all bogus. Why not just show it as it is: A plain telnet unix shell.

Oh well, for all the casual movie goers it has to be made understandable...

After all, an entertaining little film

Was the above review useful to you?

Not too good, but watchable

Author: Kujack from NY
5 January 2003

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

No movie will ever get hacking right. Obviously, nobody wants to see some kid sitting at a UNIX terminal for hours on end. However Operation Takedown (another movie about hacking) definitely does it allot better. The stupid flashy onscreen text, excessively outlandish (often stupid) characters, and the overt use of computer jargon (probably used to gain some shard of credibility), especially the word Elite, bothered me, but not as much as the fact that Angelina Jolie manages to not be (extremely) hot in this movie. That is simply a crime against humanity.

Jokes aside, the movie was decent. I was able to sit through it and enjoy it, though I hardly consider it a movie worth buying. If you're a geek (like me) you can rent it (or download it, if you are truly 1337) (jk) for a if you want to see a movie [SPOILER] about how a hacker gets laid (after all, that is the most important part of the of the movie).

Was the above review useful to you?

Not realistic with a reason

5/10
Author: bmpc
2 January 2003

Well this isn't a realistic movie, but you don't want to see a realistic hacking film. Why not? Because it isn't cool to watch someone type code on a text editor, or type on a command line. And that's probably why "Hackers" was done with in this visual, non-realistic, eye candy way. You don't see a directory structure in a command line. They show it with a 3D look. Another sequence that shows this is the one at the party where they all stare at the laptop, and it's screen saver. It's eye candy to avoid the public from running away from it.

If they did a realistic hacking movie, it would probably be very boring. This wasn't done to please those with enough computer knowledge to know that it isn't realistic, but to please a more general audience, with little computer knowledge.

With all this in mind, in order to enjoy "Hackers", one should not expect to see a great movie or a realistic approach to the world of computer security experts. Don't take it seriously. If you do, you'll probably rate it very low. If you don't maybe you will have some fun.

They did choose a good soundtrack.

I'll give it a 5.5 (5 in imdb's rating) out of 10.

Was the above review useful to you?

Not accurate, but fun!

8/10
Author: aleroy from Kentucky
21 November 2002

When I first saw this movie, I was really upset by all the things these so-called "Hackers" do. Most of the movie is fake (Hacking from the top of the Empire State Building, using a Minicassette recorder to get free long-distance phone calls, and the "3d" effect of the Gibson supercomputer.) You can't hack from the top of the Empire State Building for three reasons. 1. No phone lines. 2. No wireless network. 3. You can't go to the top of the Empire State Building. You can't use a minicassette recorder to get long-distance phone calls. You could in the 80's by using a blue box, but since all phone systems are digital now it's impossible. And, third and most unbelievable of all; the "3d" effect of the Gibson supercomputer. First of all, if this was a company server it would most likely be running UNIX, Linux, Solaris or some other variant. The "3d" effect was bizarre, but I guess it wouldn't be very exciting to watch them hack from a Command Line. =) After I got over these and other inconsistencies, I just watched the film for fun and an escape. It's pretty cool. I give it 8/10.

Was the above review useful to you?

Love, sex, secret, god...

8/10
Author: CoenRem from Eindhoven
6 November 2002

These are the four most commonly used passwords. I love this line!

The film is about a bunch of computer whizzkids who try to save the world from the evel hacker who wants to play havoc with a couple of oil tankers.... Uhmmm - Well, let's just say that the story is NOT the reason why this is a memorable movie!

No, it's the atmosphere of this flick that really captures you! It's the hardcore soundtrack from The Prodigy, it's the energy with which the characters play there roles: they were clearly having a great time!

And it hasn't even dated too much! *(made in 1995)

Great fun: a pure thrill-ride!

A well deserved vote: 8

Was the above review useful to you?

This is crap. But it's fun.

6/10
Author: kosugi from Finland
28 October 2002

This movie is fun with its cheesy and stylized view on computers and hacking, but fails in terms of character-development, storytelling, plot and everything else.

Apparently you can hack everything. Not just government databases like in other movies, but everything, whatever needs to be hacked, can be hacked, it doesn't even need an internet-connection (in one scene, lead role Zero-Cool hacks the sprinkler-system in his school) and all the l33t hackerkids use 3D internetbrowsers. Things like this is what makes this movie so fun.

I can recommend Hackers to those who have some basic knowledge of computers, because they are the only ones who can enjoy it.

Was the above review useful to you?

Cool Cyberpunk film

Author: ParanoidAndroidMarvin from U.K./U.S.
11 October 2002

If you're a hard-line computer geek, you're probably not going to like hackers. You'll say it's unrealisitic, cheesy and doesn't give the hacker culture the respect it deserves. Or something like that. Now, if you're not one of those that needs absolute realism, love cyberpunk/computer movies and can enjoy a light-hearted approach to things, then Hackers is a must see. It's also one of Angelina Jolie's first movies, so if you're a fan of hers be sure to check it out. The soundtrack is also a great aspect of the film. Watch it, love it.

Was the above review useful to you?


Page 6 of 22: [Prev][1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [Next]

Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Plot synopsis Ratings
Newsgroup reviews External reviews Parents Guide
Official site Plot keywords Main details
Your user reviews Your vote history